User talk:Túrelio

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

ATTENTION: Please use my talk page rather than emailing me.

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

Please keep discussions together:

If I was starting a thread on your talk page, please answer there. I will watch your talk page.
If you started a discussion here on my talk page, I will answer here.

All requests for and notifications of re-use of my images on Commons have been moved to Requests & Notifications.

If you can't find a comment or an older discussion here, take a look whether it is in one of my archives:
Archive1 (latest), Archive2 (2007), Archive3 (2008), Archive4 (2009), Archive5 (2010), Archive6 (2011), Archive7 (2012), Archive8 (2013), Archive9 (2014), Archive10 (2015), Archive11 (2016), Archive12 (2017), Archive13 (2018), Archive14 (2019), Archive15 (2020), Archive16 (2021), Archive17 (2022).

Need to make a license tag

Hi! I've recently found a photo that is public domain in Kyrgyzstan due to copyright expiration, but I cannot upload it to Commons yet because there is no template for works public domain in Kyrgystan because of copyright expiration (the only tag available for Krygyz works is an exempt tag). Could you create a template for this? Kyrgyzstan has similar copyright laws to many other post-Soviet republics like Uzbekistan (50 year post-publication for anonymous works, 50 years after death of author if author known) that already have tags on Commons. Can you make a tag for this or delegate this to someone who knows how? Thank you!--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image files marked for 'Speed deletion'

Hello!! Sorry, It seems like I disturbed the commons, though I followed the protocols without noticing the errors. I tried to fix some image problems as I've listed below;

The youtube link provided as a copyvios for File:Aslay.jpg does not show any image of Aslay or resemblance, I've looked the whole video, you can prove that too. The Image appears nowhere on the internet.
I replaced an image file for File:Tanasha Donna.jpg. Will it still be deleted?
Image File:Joseph Marwa (actor).jpg is a free image uploaded to Flickr, I uploaded it to the second website (cited as copyvios) myself. I've taken the image down from the second site, hope it can survive. Afyaniuhai (talk) 22:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my time-zone it's too late for a detailed reply today. However, honestly, all your uploads look like they are not your own/original work. --Túrelio (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried fixing them by uploading new versions to some of them and tried both of the nominated Images with tineye.com with 0 results from the web, that makes me have the original copies of the work, I honestly use web archives to look for one time taken image that was deleted,take them and give them free licenses through flickr(since they've got low qualities). Having a high quality image of a living individual to attach it to any meta page is really hard, but re-owning the low quality images is quite something. Have a good night, Hope you'll reconsider the request. Afyaniuhai (talk) 22:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File deletion

Hello! I would like to ask you about a deletion of this image: c:File:Гольденберг А.Х.jpg

It was uploaded for an article ru:Гольденберг,_Аркадий_Хаимович about a scholar from Russia by mr. Goldenberg himself, since the current photo is rather old and of poor quality. The photo is from his personal archive. I speak on his behalf as his relative. The image was later deleted by you. Why was it deleted? The cited reason is «copyright violation»; the image, once again, is from his personal archive.

To avoid further misunderstandings, the article itself wasn't written by mr. Goldenberg or any of his associates, his only contribution to the article was an image replacement. Veidenov (talk) 17:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Veidenov,

the reason it was deleted is that it was found in a pdf-file at https://science.asu.edu.ru/index.php/files/download/2181. Such findings generally hint to the suspicion that an "own work"-claim might not be true. Now, if Mr. Goldenberg is sure this image was either shot by himself (option 1) or has obtained the copyright from the photographer (option 2), we may solve this issue by sending a permission. If option 2 is true, then ideally the photographer him/herself should send the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). If option 11 is true, then Mr. Goldenberg can send the permission by himself. You should go to Commons:Email templates and copy the boxed text under "Email message template for release of rights to a file" (or the equivalent in Russian language (Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/ru)) and paste it into your local text-editor. Then add the filename of the image (from Commons) and the name of the choosen free license. Then, mail it to Mr. Goldenberg and ask him to either send it to the photographer or by himself sign and date it and mail it back directly (not forward) to the above mentioned address. The email will not be made public; only our OTRS-volunteers can read it. --Túrelio (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to specify it a little bit:

1) If we have a photo from mr. Goldenberg's personal archive which is not a selfie, but was taken with no commercial intent, by a friend or a student, and then sent to him, and was never published anywhere, does he have a right to upload it?

2) If we have a photo from mr. Goldenberg's personal archive which is not a selfie, but was taken with no commercial intent, by a friend or a student, and then sent to him, but was later used in a publicatiob, does he have a right to upload it?

It's all a pretty narrow scholarly circle where everyone knows each other and none of the publications are commercial, Russian copiright laws in the field of science are weak and largely neglected, and nobody really bothered with any sort of copyright legalities during the publishing og the book you linked - it was a student's photo made during some conference, it was later used as an illustration for the book which is a collection of articles dedicated to mr. Goldenberg's 70th birthday. It's really implausable that either the publisher (the university where mr. Goldenberg works) or a technical original author of the photo in question (his student) would in any way object to using this image in a wiki article, but also actually bothering with trying to get a technical permission from a student who graduated several years ago would be a pain.

If a photo was taken with no commercial intent, was never used in any commercial way, was sent to a person on the photo in a private manner, and depicts no one elce, does he have a right to upload it without making an original photographer do any paperwork? The old man just wants to look nice in his own Wikipedia article -- Veidenov (talk) 12:34, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File delation without asking about (Ticket Ticket:202211)

During the past month and also this month I have been exchanging emails about the copyright of different images uploaded by me, until I proved ownership of them. No one asked me about this particular photo. Before deleting it, and given that it was included in an article and was quite representative, I think it would have been better to ask me about. The photo is my own work. It was made by my mother and she died more than 10 years ago. Could you tell me what is the problem?MorenaClara (talk) 12:07, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No idea about which file you are talking. (I've performed 250+ deletions today) --Túrelio (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, likely it is File:Telar antiguo para confeccionar espolines.jpg. It had been tagged for deletion by OTRS-agent Ganímedes for "Impossible to verify authorship." --Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is the one (I included the tickect number). Then, what can I do? It is my mums work and now it is mine. I was in the original picture and cut off myself. She died, as mentioned. Ganimedes did not contact me about that picture as she did with others. Any suggestion? Thank you. MorenaClara (talk) 16:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to talk to Ganimedes or OTRS. I am not an OTRS-volunteer, so I don't have any access to OTRS-communication.(therefore the ticket# didn't help me to find the filename) Probably you need to convince them that you are the heir of your mother's work/copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I thought you were an OTRS-volunteer, I was confused. I will try to contact her. MorenaClara (talk) 20:10, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sports logos

Hi!

Firstly, thank you for deleting the Kaohsiung Steelers logo. I was unaware of the high quality rule at the time, but it makes sense from a copyright perspective. Second, I want to ask how it would be possible to add a logo to the wikipedia article. I can see them in the NBA team's pages, euroleague team pages, and it just adds to the page quality, it makes it easily recognizeable. So, any suggestions, svg format or another platform instead of wikimedia commons (they dont allow logos) maybe? Thanks for your hard work and time! MrSplashman77 (talk) 16:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrSplashman77,

if you want to add it to :en-Wikipedia, you could upload the logo locally at :en and then claim it as fair-use (en:Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline). If you want to use it on a Wikipedia, which has no exemption-policy, then you might ask a user from Taiwan if he/she could look whether the logo is permanently displayed/installed somewhere outdoors and then take a photo of it and upload it to Commons, claiming freedom-of-panorama. If that is not possible, then you need to ask the Kaohsiung Steelers directly of they are willing to release the logo under Commons-compatible free license. --Túrelio (talk) 19:42, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please undone delete of File:River-Plate.svg this is the logo of a public football team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ARO III (talk • contribs) 18:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ARO III, being a "public football team" has no relevance for copyright. The logo was sourced to https://cariverplate.uy, which carries the note "© Copyright 2019 Club Atletico River Plate", whereas the uploader claimed it to be under CC-license, but did not provide eny evidence for that. --Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gerda Thune Andersen

Hi, according to this file these are made by Gerda Thune Andersen: File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque C. G. Schultz.ajb.jpg, File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque Else Roesdahl.ajb.jpg, File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque Holger Schmidt.ajb.jpg, File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque Olaf Olsen.ajb.jpg and File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque Sv. Søndergaard.ajb.jpg. Due to the no FOP in Denmark for art and her not being dead yet, or at least not long enough for them to be free, the files should be nominated. Since they're from the same artist, is the nomination supposed to be a single request, or does one make one for each? TherasTaneel (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can combine them into 1 DR. When I want to do this, I start the DR-script for 1 file, and then simply copy the resulting template from the processed file to all the other files and add their filenames to the DR-page. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I think... I know what you mean, but what about the notification to the uploader, they would only get one, do I add the other files as a list underneath in the same section or use the template for each? TherasTaneel (talk) 19:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, if the files are from different uploaders, then you need to click on the template on the affected files and copy the uploader-notification-link and paste it on the uploader's talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Uploads by Fæ needing speedy deletion

Hi, if you have time, could you clear out the above category? I tend to put all the poor Fleuron-related images in there, they're simply not worth any more effort. I'm not sure if anyone else uses it. Thanks in advance. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:34, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll look into it early next week. --Túrelio (talk) 14:10, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:CrownGeolinaMagna KaiserinWPAC.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 12:55, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SVG conversion

Hi. I'm wondering if this SVG File:Seal of the City of Salatiga.svg is a valid conversion from File:Lambang Kota Salatiga.png. There're a great deal of changes. I don't see any modifications on the cite website https://salatiga.go.id/tentang-salatiga/lambang-daerah/ Pinging uploader RaFaDa20631 for any inputs -- DaxServer (talk) 10:52, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Updated: I updated the arms on 18 February 2023 as a part of evaluations/corrections among coats of arms of regencies in Java. The original citation/reference is a law/regulation document titled 1997 Regional Regulation No. 5 (Peraturan Daerah Kotamadya Dati II Salatiga No. 5 Tahun 1997, documented at JDIH Kota Salatiga) as I mentioned before... RaFaDa20631 (talk) 14:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walkie T на баттле против Изтолпы.png

What's wrong with the file? same CC license. Нейроманьяк (talk) 17:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File deletion

Hi~ why the "なぞクー「Goo」" pictures deleted? even Mysterious Qoo did not appear in the introduction of friends on the official website, but Mysterious Qoo is a official character that did appeared in the past. Here are three ads that which Mysterious Qoo's appeared：

①CM 「镜にうつったのは......」(なぞクーWEB篇) (2004年6月) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfVRy0R0Ddk ②CM 「镜にうつったのは......」(なぞクーグッズキャンペーン編) (2004年) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEuQzLgDGFE ③CM「Qooの乳酸カシス子汁」篇（2005年3月24日）https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvdJj71OGIs Tamiacoco (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christian Holst Vigilius, 2022.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind taking a look at File:Christian Holst Vigilius, 2022.jpg when you have the chance? This file has the same name as a file you deleted on December 11, 2022, as a copyvio, but I don't think it's the same file. However, I'm also not too sure that the uploader's claim of "own work" is valid either since the EXIF data for the new reference is the kind that often comes from photos downloaded from Facebook. Most of this uploader's uploads are fairly high photos of Danish politicians being claimed as "own work". There's almost never any EXIF data or source information provided to help verify any such claim. That fact that first version uploaded of this file (i.e. the one you deleted) seems to have also been uploaded as "own work" even though it was clearly attributed to someone else and most likely came from some website makes me a bit concerned that the uploader might just be not being sufficiently diligent when it comes things like COM:Own work and COM:NETCOPYVIO. They might mistakenly think that downloading a file from somewhere online somehow means they now own the copyright on the file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anders Stjernholm, 2017.jpg is the most recent file uploaded by this user. Its EXIF data also suggest it comes from Facebook and the EXIF data actually attributes to the file to "Roberto Borgen Fb.com/RobertoCapture". Unless that can be verified by VRT to be the uploader, it seem the uploader is simply taking photos from online and uploading them to Commons regardless of their copyright status. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hey, Túrelio, may you help me out with these two images? They’re marked as valued, but apparently they were simply cropped from the real valued image: this and this. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The author suggested to quickly delete the image

I'm the author and I would like to delete it quickly image Dự thảo Bảng lương Sĩ quan Quân đội và Công an Việt Nam năm 2021. Because: I'm about to release a new version of the image but it's extracted from a .png file so I need to request that the old image be removed before I can post the new image. Please help me delete old pictures. Thank you. Taitamtinh (talk) 09:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cabot Logo.png

Hi Túrelio. This is in reference to User talk:Túrelio/Archive17#File:Cabot Logo.png since File:Cabot Logo.png was deleted by Krd on March 28, 2023 per COM:CSD#F5 but then reuploaded the following day by a user named Rockswanson. It still has the same issues as before, and my guess is that the uploader is either Cabotcoop or someone else associated with Cabot Creamery. I don't think this file can be keep without VRT verification or something else showing it has been released under as licensed; at the same time, it's going to start being disrupted if a new account is created to reupload the file each time it's deleted. Any suggestions on what to do here? -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Modern swami

cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Swami Vivekananda 1893 Speech Why We Disagree.ogg and File:Text-Video-World-Parliament-of-Religion-1.ogv. This presumably also applies to File:Vivekananda1.ogg (see its talk page), File:Text-Video-Weltparlament-der-Religionen-SV.ogv, and File:Text-Audio-SV-World-Parliament-of-Religion-disagree.ogv. CC Infrogmation who closed the DR. The videos give Youtube as their source, and the description on Youtube give Wikisource as their source (where the videos were in use until today when I removed them, as they are not compliant with the annotations policy in addition to be being likely copyvios). So almost certainly they are modern user creations by the same person that added them to enWS. The audio file seems to have been confirmed as a modern fake since there are no known recordings of the speech in question. Xover (talk) 17:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Terek oblast (Russian empire) 1862.png

File:Terek oblast 1862.png. This card of the same series. On the external site since 2012 and in the Commons since 2019. You are sought to look in the version of the deleted file where there is a link. 195.19.124.2 01:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bruckner' Works on the German Wikipedia

Dear Túrelio,

In the past I have updated the pages on the Bruckner works which were already present on the English Wikipedia and created individual pages for all the other Bruckner works with exception of the piano and organ works and the Kitzler-Studienbuch for which I have created a descriptive list. Thereafter I have translated/adapted all these pages on the French Wikipedia. I am updating these Wikipedia pages every time there is new significant information about the Bruckner works.

I just have started on 14 April 2023 to do the same for the German Wikipedia. I have already created the pages Messe für den Gründonnerstag and Missa Solemnis (Bruckner), and expanded the already existing pages Kronstorfer Messe and Windhaager Messe, but it is not an easy job because of my not optimal practice of the German language. Do not hesitate to have a look on these pages and to improve their content.

Have a fine day! Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 12:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Réginald. I'll look into it. --Túrelio (talk) 06:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletions of fictitious flags

Hi Túrelio

Is there a way to resquest a speedy deletion of all these flags : Flags of Provinces of Algeria recreated yesterday whereas they had been removed in 2022 ([1])

All these flags are fictitious and fanciful.

The contributor Russian Onest has also uploaded other such fictitious flags ([2]) --Poudou99 (talk) 00:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Derivative work-related deletion requests/pending

Could you please take a look at the requests in the category? Some of them have been without any response for more than a month Trade (talk) 18:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Ekpa

Can you do this one too? [3] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Discussion about it at User_talk:Let'sUploadNow#The_image_which_I_uploaded_is_free_of_copyright. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update:[4] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some more update (on WP):[5] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:09, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to tell me to stop bugging you, but:File:Simon Ekpa, 2023. (Official portrait).jpg. IMO these flickr claims are very likely bullshit, the pic has been online since 2017:[6] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:16, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly they went via flickr this time, possibly because someone gave them the idea: User_talk:Let'sUploadNow#The_image_which_I_uploaded_is_free_of_copyright. Oh well. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:31, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I don't now the Commons-procedure when the uploader removes a copyvio-tag:[7] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 22:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification on German laws

Hey! I have a ton of photos from CSD Parade 2022. However, I'm not sure if there're any relevant laws that'd prohibit to release such photos under CC BY. Apart from adding a Template:Personality rights, I don't see any hindrances. I know a lot of people, including myself, shield themselves [using hands] if they spot someone taking pictures in public spaces. Do you know if there're some laws that I need to refer to? Thanks for your response! -- DaxServer (talk) 19:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:AkhterHusainGovernorOfWestPakistan.png

Hi Túrelio. Can you check to see whether File:AkhterHusainGovernorOfWestPakistan.png is the same as File:Akhter Husain Governor Of WestPakistan.png? My guess is that it is and the uploader simply reuploaded the file after you deleted it the first time. This might also be a case of COM:LL given the file's EXIF data. It's possible that the uploader is manipulating EXIF data given they also uploaded File:FoundationStone-Minar-e-Pakistan.png claiming that it was digitalized in 1980, which seems a bit odd. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Löschung von Bildern

Hallo Túrelio, es gibt ein grundsätzliches Problem mit dem Benutzer A1Cafel, den ich deswegen auch auf der Administratorenseite gemeldet habe (Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:A1Cafel). Der Typ lädt hundertfach Duplikate von Flickr hoch, weil er sich nicht die Mühe macht - und ich habe ihn schon mehrfach darum gebeten, sich diese Mühe zu machen! - zu überprüfen, ob die Dateien nicht schon auf Commons sind. Jetzt haben wir einen gigantischen Salat in der Category:European Youth Event 2023, weil es 171 verschiedene Dateien zweimal gibt. Man müsste also 171 verschiedene Löschanträge stellen! Uff! Das ist mir zu viel! Daher schreibe ich dich hier an mit der Bitte, die Duplikate pauschal zu löschen, ohne gesonderten Antrag für jedes Bild. Man müsste A1Cafel bei Strafe verbieten, Flickr-Dateien hochzuladen, er ist zu blöd oder zu böswillig dafür (ich vermute Letzteres). Danke und liebe Grüße Edelseider (talk) 11:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sembra che non tieni nulla da fare

è possibile che devi contestare anche tutto quello che si fa in un wikipedia che non sia il tuo e sono cose che nemmeno conosci? fare una traduzione per te sarebbe soltanto uno spreco di tempo Giov.c (talk) 20:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted image

Hi, I believe you may have mistakenly deleted (image, talk) an image. Please compare the deleted image to Edward's figure, here. I know they look similar, because they obviously are displaying the same thing, but they are completely different in terms of origin. If it's possible to undelete, that would be great. Thanks! Let me know if I'm missing anything. Chamaemelum (talk) 06:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I may have left out attribution, (the image is "inspired" by the paper, of course); please let me know what type of attribution is required, if any, and I can fix the issue.

I will make sure to add the correct tag after it is undeleted, due to Commons:Threshold of originality § Charts. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-chart Chamaemelum (talk) 15:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, well, for me they look completely identical. Anyway, I will put it into a regular DR, which allows a discussion and input of others. --Túrelio (talk) 16:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:EdwardsFigure.png. --Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chamaemelum is uploading other copyrighted material and using incorrect licensing [8], [9] (the latter image was not published in the United States) so the claim that it is in the public domain in the United States is not true, so that should be removed. I don't have time to go through this users other uploads but many are suspect and some have been deleted. On Wikipedia this user caused mayhem and ended up getting blocked for disruption. It was later found that they added a lot of copyrighted material. I see a pattern here. It is ridiculous they are claiming above that the Edwards graph is there own but I won't be commenting about this again. It's time consuming having to clean up after a problematic user. Psychologist Guy (talk) 00:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Psychologist Guy, I have uploaded very old historical images and got details possibly incorrect, but those are completely different and seperate from the current image, which I made from scratch. Chamaemelum (talk) 00:59, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of India.svg

Rename:

Flag India.svg → Flag of India.svg

Rkt2312 (talk) 21:35, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by User:Theresunset

Hello Túrelio!

I noticed that you quickly acted on the copyvio deletions I tagged just now. Thank you very much for your vigilance.

I was just wondering if you had time to do the same for this deletion request I submitted a few days ago with images from the same user: Commons:Deletion_requests/2023/08/16#Uploads_by_User:Theresunset. All of these images were tagged as public domain or with no license at all, and all of them are taken from various internet sources. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if this person understands the concept of copyright very well. Thank you very much. Mr. Gerbear (talk) 16:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, it would really have been better to put the different file-groups into separate DRs, instead of putting them all into one, as some could actually be speedied due to being clear copyvios. --Túrelio (talk) 20:40, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dan - November 13 2007.jpg

Now I see it. Source is http://www.dan-wagner.com/ where the footer says © 2022 copyright Dan Wagner. All rights reserved, but the CC is in the picture. Good catch. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Verwijdering van Bestand:20-Voorplaat Bastion Hotels 1990

U heeft een afbeelding verwijderd omdat deze niet de juiste rechten had. Deze afbeelding is ontworpen en geschetst door Leonard van Veldhoven zelf, zou u deze weer terug willen plaatsen? Vriendelijk dank. J.Bolle (talk) 10:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are refering to File:20-Voorplaat Bastion Hotels.jpg? Well, you wrote "own work" (of you), which isn't true then. Anyway, if Leonard van Veldhoven is the artist, he needs to send a confirmation of the free license, under which you uploaded this image, to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). If he is willing to do this, I can temp-undelete the image. --Túrelio (talk) 12:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

From DR to Duplicate?

Dear Túrelio, Am I allowed to replace all deletion requests currently at this talk page (that are still open) with duplicate requests? This would make it easier for involved admins, and save time for everyone. Vysotsky (talk) 12:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

as obviously nobody commented in the DRs and as the nominator did not link the specific target-files, I see no problem with your plan. --Túrelio (talk) 15:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Vysotsky (talk) 16:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Roberto Vannacci

FYI here some information is missing, or the deletion is wrong. I see a link to this website where there is the image used on Wikipedia with the clear information "Foto tratta da wikipedia" (that is "Photo taen from Wikipedia). It was clearly added recently (I had few doubts about that, but webarchive is quite clear). It took me 2 minutes to point out and I was lucky because I remember the image since I have added the P18 on Wiidata, and I know it's that one. Alexmar983 (talk) 03:41, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the information. I've undeleted the image and put it into a regular DR to allow for discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roberto Vannacci.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 06:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kristina Andreyevna Potupchik (cropped).jpg

Why reverted? As an uploader I can nominate it for deletion. It is written in the rules. FlorianH76 (talk) 20:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1) You tagged it for speedy deletion; that's not the same as (regular) deletion. 2) "The rules" allow the uploader to request deletion of an (unused) image within 7 days after upload. This one was uploaded in April and you tagged it in August. So, to request its deletion now, you need to open a regular deletion-request and provide a serious rationale (other than just "uploader request"). --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But why uploader can't delete the own upload? FlorianH76 (talk) 10:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Think of it as gift you gave (in this case to humanity). It's a bit like retracting a gift. Legally speaking: 1) external sites might be using this image, as it was offered under a free license. If the image is deleted, there is some risk they might be sued for copyright-violation and for some it wouldn't be easy to prove otherwise. 2) CC-licenses, if validly given, are considered non-revokable. --Túrelio (talk) 14:23, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vande Bharat Express (Aug '23).jpg

Hey @Túrelio,

I request you to kindly revert that picture back since it was originally taken by my cousin Pavan Kumar who visited that factory to witness the new livery of the express train. I need to know how it's considered as copyright. I clearly mentioned that source owner was my cousin. Harshul12345 (talk) 16:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Harshul12345: Hi, and thanks for your contributions! I see that you have been uploading photos taken by your family members, not yourself. From a legal standpoint, this is technically a copyright violation because you don't own the copyright: your family member does. To make sure everything is legally valid, can you please have your cousin and your brother send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org? The content of the email should be something like this: "My name is [name] and the Wikimedia Commons user Harshul12345 is my [relationship]. I hereby authorize them to upload all photos I take to Wikimedia Commons under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 license. This declaration is valid for all uploaded items in the future." The email should include the URLs of the files you already uploaded, and the VRT team member will place the ticket number on the image page. You will then be able to use the same ticket number on any future uploads of their photos. Thanks again! —holly {chat} 17:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Harshul12345: the mentioned image is a collage of 2 images. The upper one is offered as single-image on Shutterstock and Adobe Stock Images. Both agencies offer it for editorial use only. Therefore, I find your claim "1st Pic - own pic" not credible. And the lower image of this collage, which you credited to your cousin, seems to be a screenshot from this unfree Youtube-video (01:34).--Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete File:20-Voorplaat Bastion Hotels.jpg

Hi Turelio, could you please undelete above file, permission has been received from the designer, per Ticket:2023082010001841. I could do it myself, but that is perhaps against some guideline. Kind regards, Ellywa (talk) 21:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ellywa,

Done. Thanks for asking; though it's not necessary, as I trust the OTRS/VRT-guys (and my admin fellows). --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (2×). Ellywa (talk) 15:08, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted File:Mojtaba Azizian 01.jpg as a copyvio

The same file (name) is back, same uploader. I cannot see linkedIn profiles, so have started a DR. If it is a copyvio it could be deleted faster! 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification at the DR 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:34, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish Album Cover File:Mavi Işıklar – Tatlı Bela.jpg

Are you saying that a old record company that was shut down years ago owns the copyrights of this image, why did you include it in fast deletions? Lim10Sevdalısı (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lim10Sevdalısı, you are aware that copyright lasts, in nearly all countries of the world, for 70 years after the death of the author/creator? So, if this cover was created in 1968 (as per your description), that is just 55 years ago. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:JiriProchazka2022.png

Hi, you have recently deleted the following file: File:JiriProchazka2022.png whereas the YouTube video from which the picture is taken is under the Creative Commons license (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqKZtxxEaYs). So you chose to delete a file that can be used on Wikipedia...

Could you please restore the file because there was no reason to delete it and in the future, at least, just click on the links to check the Creative Commons licenses of YouTube videos?

Thanks in advance, AideDésintéressée (talk) 01:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The file had been wrongly tagged. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 06:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christoph Amberger 010.jpg

Hallo Túrelio,

die Datei hatte ich zuvor in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Christoph Amberger 010.jpg explizit behalten, wie auch auf der Dateidiskussionsseite vermerkt. Dass dieselbe Benutzerin die Datei jetzt einfach als vermeintliche Dublette zur Entsorgung freigibt, ist nicht gerade "die feine englische Art". Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 10:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rosenzweig,

upps, das hatte ich nicht gesehen. Ich kann sie einfach wieder herstellen. --Túrelio (talk) 12:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

scratch deleted page

Scratch is a free platform and its creators allow sharing contents. 4.3 All user-generated content you submit to Scratch is licensed to and through Scratch under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license. This allows others to view and remix your content. This license also allows the Scratch Team to display, distribute, and reproduce your content on the Scratch website, through social media channels, and elsewhere. If you do not want to license your content under this license, then do not share it on Scratch. This over here is the text that you can find here [10]. I'm a teacher and I need my pictures to teach to my pupils, pleas.. I usually take vìcare of the licence of the content I upload to commons. Thank you in advance. Matteo Mattruffoni (talk) 19:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matteo,

I assume you are referring to the deleted file File:ScratchJrGuidaInterfaccia.png, right? Or also other files?

As I was offline most of the day and don't have enough time at this moment to thoroughly study the above linked ToU, I will conditionally restore the screenshot. But we really need to be sure that a screenshot of the Scratch GUI is really also under a CC license. --Túrelio (talk) 20:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Can I use screenshots of Scratch in a book or presentation?

Yes, you can use screenshots / images of the Scratch application and website in a book or presentation, and consider them to be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license. We ask that you include a note somewhere in your materials saying: "Scratch is a project of the Scratch Foundation, in collaboration with the Lifelong Kindergarten Group at the MIT Media Lab. It is available for free at https://scratch.mit.edu"." per [11]. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove my own picture - that I OWN ???

Please do not remove pictures that I have posted as my own media. Newart61 (talk) 18:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Newart61 I see that you claimed that the "owner of original shot is Phil Soussan who has licensed it here." at File:Philsoussan_0525.jpg. Please have the photographer or copyright owner sent permission to COM:VRT. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links on talk pages

Hi Túrelio! Just out of curiosity. Can you please tell me where I can find such a recommendation that records of external uses of media in the form of external links on discussion pages are welcome. Am I missing something? As for me, talk pages should be intended for completely something else, for example, for discussion of various issues concerning the file, but certainly not to be an archive of external links. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 02:57, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kirilloparma,

we have a template {{Published}} to record external uses. See File talk:MotherTeresa 090.jpg for example. Of course, there is no obligation to record such uses or to use said template. However, I am aware that a number of prolific contributors do actively use it for their own uploads. For myself, I try to record any re-use of Commons-images that I stumble over. However, due to limited spare-time, I usually record only the link to the re-use, but do not complete all data which the template asks for; as this can be done later. --Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:육지혜.jpg

Please see the small CC-BY icon at the right bottom of the posted page 119.204.148.84 10:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks for notifying. I had looked for it, before I tagged the file, but did not find it. --Túrelio (talk) 12:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joselito

In the source LastFm, there is written: En Last.fm, cualquier usuario puede editar las descripciones de los artistas. ¡Contribuye cuando quieras! Todos los textos de contribuciones de usuarios en esta página están bajo la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual; es posible que se apliquen condiciones adicionales. Thanks.--Salnitrum (talk) 20:22, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It states "Todos los textos"; that is not valid for the images. --Túrelio (talk) 20:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ukrhydroenergo vs Category:Ukrhidroenerho

Can you take a look into the old version of the deleted category, to repair the redirect, please? I don't see the deleted versions... Wieralee (talk) 18:10, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have temporarily undeleted the 2nd cat, as I don't know with term is the correct one. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tater Tot bonkers.webp

Hello, it appears that you removed the above photo from Wikimedia Commons as a copyright violation, causing it to be removed from the Wikipedia article Tater Tot (cat). However, the photo in question was actually an original photo taken and owned by the human caretaker of the cat, Ash Houghton (Wikipedia username Inertiaash ), who posted it shortly before it was removed. Her posting it is shown in the history of the Tater Tot (cat) Wikipedia page, and she also mentioned on the cat's public social media group that she had added his picture to his page at the time she posted it.

It is possible that the photo used by Ash might have been licensed by her to some media outlets, as the cat had a lot of media coverage worldwide, and many of the outlets used, hopefully with Ash's permission, original photos of Tater Tot taken by Ash and posted to her/ the cat's social media before he went viral. It is also possible that perhaps Ash did not observe some "best practice" in uploading her original photo, as I am not sure how often she edits Wikipedia.

In any event, would it be possible for you to undelete the photo? If not possible, what steps can we take to put an original photo of Tater Tot taken by Ash and used with Ash's permission up on his page (or elsewhere if his article ends up getting merged as result of AFD process). Best regards, TheBlinkster (talk) 18:18, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @TheBlinkster, it's indeed possible what you outlined in your 2nd paragraph. It would likely be sufficient, if Inertiaash either sends an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS) just confirming that she is the true photographer of the 2 images in this montage or, if possible, sends the montage in JPEG format with camera-data (metadata). In the latter case it is not necessary that she releases the JPEG-version under a free license, if she doesn't want that. --Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will reach out to her and see if we can do all that. TheBlinkster (talk) 21:02, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Android 7.1.2 Nougat, Google Pixel Screenshot.png & File:Nokia 7 Plus with Android Pie.jpg

Hi, Could you check to see if the two deleted screenshots contain any wallpaper on Category:AOSP wallpapers? Thanks. Larryasou (talk) 09:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no, they don't. The 1st one is in shades of green and is probably a satellite-image showing an ocean-coast (under water); the 2nd one is in blue and shows likely a night-sky in the arctic with snow/ice on earth in the foreground. --Túrelio (talk) 10:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick reply. It's all right. Larryasou (talk) 10:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And what about these old screenshots?

File:Android KitKat screenshot.png <- yes, but only the second (uploaded 06:53, 3. Nov. 2013) of 5 revisions
File:Android 4.4 on the Nexus 5.jpg <- no
File:Android 4.4.2 (Nexus 5).png <- no
File:Android 4.4.2 Home screen.png <- yes

Do they contain the same wallpaper as File:Nexus 5 (2).jpg? Larryasou (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replied inline. --Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

I can't find the thank button next to deletion edits, so I'll just do it like this. Thanks for swifly responding to my deletion request, it's appreciated! ReneeWrites (talk) 12:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

"File:Kesagake death.jpg", "File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1914).jpg". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.207.152.8 (talk • contribs)

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Can 1972 (Heinrich Klaffs Collection 102).jpg

Could you help me check the source of the file? Thanks. Larryasou (talk) 12:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was http://www.flickr.com/photos/heiner1947/4409494480/sizes/l/in/set-72157623560321196/ . --Túrelio (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

actions are ripping sources out from images

You are aware that by rolling all images of a specific blazon together you are ripping out source material? All the coats of arms I uploaded to commons had such information, that is which blazon (mostly Loutsch, Armorial du Pays de Luxembourg, I hope I don't have to explain what a blazon is) I based the image on and it's blazoning in multiple languages. That is, what you are currently doing is saving some storage space on commons but reducing the quality of information. A coat of arms is not just an image but always also its blazon which in many cases is the more important data (I'm working on the Chifflet-Prinet roll of arms off Wikipedia right now, all I have to go on is a blazon, not some image I might be copying). Not to mention that the text accompanying a file is separately licensed (usually GNU) from the image, not that the later matters much with heraldry as blazoning in and of itself is not copyrightable. I can't even verify your exact actions as the files are immediately deleted (without the usual process of alerting the author) and as a non admin I have no access to the original information. I find this activity odd, I would not even have noticed at this time if my phone had not sent me strange notifications. I am not active here anymore, only do occasional text edits when I notice a problem in an article, so go ahead and continue this way. But maybe you should think your actions over, I really don't think this is productive. --Caranorn (talk) 20:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Caranorn,

sorry for this mess. I admit that I relied on the requesting user (User:Kontributor 2K) to act reasonably. Every day there are several hundreths of duplicate-requests to process, in addition to other speedy-requests. First, I can list the blazon/blason-images which I have dupe-deleted recently. --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been better if this had gone through the regular deletion process including notifying the users involved. It's still not certain I would have noticed as I don't look at my talk pages often, but at least I would have had the chance to explain the issue in the deletion request. While I was active here in Commons I always tried to list as detailed source information as I could, that is where I found the information including page numbers and the description in that source. I then would translate the blazon from French into English, in some cases I had an Italian speaking user knowledgeable in heraldry help and add that language as well (oddly enough, looking over my files, I don't seem to have added the German blazon). It's not much data, but I found it to be useful at the time. Looking at the files of mine you deleted, I realize that the blazons in at least two languages were at least copied. The detail on their owner/bearer on the other hand was shortened, the source information had page numbers cut off. But as you said, it seems that loss of information comes from User:Kontributor 2K, that is when he uploaded his new images to consolidate the others he did not include all that information. This is not a personal matter for me, even if I am inactive here I still see commons and the other projects are important. If it is in the interest to delete my files to maintain quality I have no problem with it. I just think as much information as possible should be included. --Caranorn (talk) 07:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Caranorn,

I have added information about Warsberg and Limpach on the pages,

Sorry for this omission,

--Kontributor 2K (talk) 09:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted from 24th to 13th of September. --Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2023 stamps of Germany

Hallo, könntest du bitte erläutern, wieso die Kategorie gelöscht wurde? Dort waren bis dahin mindestens zwei lizenztechnisch saubere Bilder einsortiert, insofern verstehe ich die Begründung nicht. MfG --A.Savin 10:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, als ich sie gelöscht hatte, war sie jedenfalls leer. Markiert war sie von Adamant1. Die edit-summary wird automatisch aus dem Text im Baustein übernommen. Ich kann sie gerne wiederherstellen. --Túrelio (talk) 10:36, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ja bitte, denn sie ist nicht mehr leer. Wer ist bitte Adamant1, um sich blind auf seine Aktionen zu verlassen? War in diesem Fall alles völliger Unfug. --A.Savin 10:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message on A.Savin's talk page about it. Really, I should should have been the one to message. Regardless though, we don't usually create categories for stamps where the year of the stamps is copyrighted and a user was recently blocked for doing exactly that after multiple warnings not to. Otherwise it's just that much harder to find copyrighted stamps. Which is why up-merged the images in the category and nominated it for deletion. So I'd appreciate it if you both left them in the main category. At some point I'll move them "by decade" categories, but I just haven't got there yet. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: Can you please restore my edits and re-delete the category if A.Savin isn't willing to since there was nothing "blind" about it and I made them based on prior consensus? I made the edits as part of a larger project to move images of stamps to "postage stamps" categories anyway and A.Savin undermining things by showing concern about something that isn't an issue really doesn't help. So I'd appreciate it if my edits where restored regardless. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wen Tong.jpg

Referring to your revert of my duplicate file nomination, I'd like to ask why a 635×997 pixels file is better than the 1,830×2,880 pixels replacement file. Moreover, if you look at the calligraphy at the top right corner, you'll see some of the calligraphy was cut out during the scan process. Your explanation is appreciated, thank you.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am aware of the lower resolution of the now kept file. However, if you look at the image/drawing of the Bamboo-branch, you will see that the brown background in homogeneous in the lower-res image, whereas it shows really a lot of artifacts/damage in the higher-res image. That was why I want to keep both files. --Túrelio (talk) 14:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thanks!廣九直通車 (talk) 00:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please review these

I would request you to kindly review some GODL-India images that I have uploaded or have worked on in past few days. Its presence in the given link needs to be confirmed. It will be of great help. Some of these are used widely by some of the most viewed pages on Wikipedia.

I know the list is quite long. But I don't know what else to do. Please help. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 04:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio I asked to do this to two more admins one turned down and one kindof ignored. Thatswhy I am here. It might be jumping the queue but there are so many unreviewed GODL-INDIA images. So I thought this might be a better choice. If not all are possible right now because of your workload, then do atleast some now and some later may be tomorrow or when you feel free. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 04:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shaan Sengupta,

for now I have reviewed 3 images of the list; the others later. However, I can now fully understand the reluctance of my colleagues with reviewing files under that license. The review-script doesn't work. Clicking on the small script below the description-box ".. file version controlled .." doesn't work.

To get a proper result, you have to manually add a line of code from Category:Unreviewed photos of GODL-India to the image-page, then manually add the date and copy a portion from the existing line of license-code on the image-page into the new line of code and then remove the old line of code. Of course, plus checking the provided source. That's an absolute mess. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio Man this really is a mess. Anyways I thank you for this. Hope you do the rest as soon as possible. One more thing I am noticing that an IP is making unneeded changes here. He just vandalised this discussion and others. Although I have reverted him would request you to take some action what you think is right. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 14:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the IP-edits. They are now blocked. --Túrelio (talk) 16:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much @Túrelio. I shall be back when I need your help. File:Atal Bihari Vajpayee (crop 2).jpg isn't reviewed. Rather the file it is derived from was reviewed by you. Is it ok? Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you once again @Túrelio. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 17:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hi Túrelio! Thank you very much for your quick help. (Bad Category:Gyula Rózsavölgyi). :-))) Bizottmány (talk) 07:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo la paie facile.fr.png

Hi, Túrelio. Why did you delete that file? The deletion reasons seemed invalid, so I'm wondering if there was another reason you hadn't stated.

Thanks and all the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3ALogo+la+paie+facile.fr.png Looking at it, I don't see that it was clearly forming an educational purpose, and numerous elements of problematic editing. Suggest that chasing this one is a waste of good time. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All I want to know is the real deletion reason. I don't have any other stake in this deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:01, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ikan,

as it was months ago, I don't have fresh memory about this file/image. When I deleted this file, the DR was not linked on the page, otherwise I would have closed the DR. I assume I made a "composite"-decision out of: 1) image being low-res, 2) being unused and 3) the uploader herself requesting deletion with rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 07:17, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's good enough for me. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User's art work uploads

Thoughts on this user's uploads Category:Files by Aleksandr Glukhov of their own work. At a bare minimum we need to get them to provide permissions, though I wonder whether it would just be better not being onsite. I could be thinking too harshly, hence seeking the opinion. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi billinghurst,

while I am not really versed is judging art, I think per the 2nd entry in Commons:Volunteer Response Team#When contacting VRT is unnecessary, asking for a confirmation/permission is appropriate here (outstanding or professional quality). Surely it could be a sort of "collective" permission. However, it might be wise to first check, which of his uploads are derivatives, such as File:Александр Владимирович Глухов. Времени на раскачку нет. Царь Руси. 2021. 2D графика.jpg and File:Александр Владимирович Глухов. "вЕЛИКАЯ Российская империя" (символическая композиция). 2021. 2D графика.jpg, which require additional information, as the underlying/background-image is unlikely his own work.
In addition, a colleague versed in art might evaluate whether his uploads are in COM:SCOPE (and not just using Commons as showcase). --Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nickmovies

I’m So sorry. I was testing an edit and pressed save instead of cancel by mistake. Sorry. MexTDT (talk) 20:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WRB

I received a response from Stefaan Dondeyne, permission was indeed given. Now it's OK. Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please forward the permission-mail/link to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Maxinvestigator (talk) 14:20, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Slanderous accusations by BobRizzo

What is your problem? I own the copyrights. Your edits are vandalism to a wiki page. You are harassing someone based on political extremism. BobRizzo (talk) 12:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to re-upload my art that you removed for political reasons, and for the record has been publicly published, but am being stopped because of your edits. You need to re-upload my images. BobRizzo (talk) 12:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you had been told previously on your talkpage User talk:BobRizzo, your uploads had been tagged for speedy deletion (by another user, not me) for suspicion of being copyvios, i.e. without permission by the author. I then performed the requested speedy deletion, as I found it credible. Why?

Per the description of your uploads, you claimed to be the author of all these images, when in fact they are the work of Sean Delonas, a living artist, who surely still holds the copyright for his works.

Your wrongful accusations of "removed for political reasons", "You are harassing someone", "based on political extremism" against me are ridiculous and slanderous. Until this moment I didn't even know of Sean Delonas.

If you think you own the copyright for these cartoons, you need to proof it. If you obtained from the author a release under the claimed CC license, you need to forward his confirmation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). If you are Sean Delonas by yourself, you have a conflict of interest in writing in the article about you on :en-Wikipedia, but anyway have to send a confirmation about your identity to above linked OTRS-address. Do not re-upload these images before a permission has been sent to OTRS and has been positively evaluated by OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 13:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it that you and David Gerard can make scurrilous attacks about an artist and prevent wiki readers the ability to see that artist's artwork? BobRizzo (talk) 13:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice conspiration theory. David Gerard did not edit any of these images. They were (legitimately) tagged by another user.

Your additional accusation against me "attacks about an artist" shows how little you understand. Here on Commons we mostly care about copyright (main reason for deletions), because we respect the copyright of the artists. --Túrelio (talk) 13:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You won.

1) Wiki readers will NOT see cartoons and other artwork that is attacked on this wiki page (thanks to you); 2) I am Sean Delonas, the copyright belongs solely to me. I have NO idea what "They were (legitimately) tagged by another user" even means; and 3) in regards to David Gerard's edits, he removed positive stories about me claiming "dead link," which is demonstrably a false statement.

YOU are disgrace, and lack the integrity. BobRizzo (talk) 15:05, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One last thing, you claim I'm NOT Sean Delonas. Do you want me to email me from my personal email which has my name on it, or if you like, contact me thru my website SeanDelonas.com and I'll respond. Your statement is provably FALSE. So much for integrity. BobRizzo (talk) 15:08, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One last thing: I can't prove it, but there is NO doubt in my mind, that you are associated with political activist David Gerard (who has been harassing both myself and my family for years). BobRizzo (talk) 15:12, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As any communication with you is completely futile, I close this threat here. Any further comment by you will be removed. Feel free to request un-deletion of your uploads at Commons:Undeletion requests or to voice your complaint at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. EOD. --Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:1217 Scalettapass.jpg

Hi, I uploaded twice the same file, but it is the other one which should be deleted. I am taking care of that now. Yann (talk) 18:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok. --Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Need to take some action

@Túrelio I am here to bring one thing to your notice. User:George Simon Ohm has once again added File:Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury official portrait.jpg that you deleted as a copyvio as File:Shri Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury.jpg after I nominated it. I nominated so many files uploaded by him under GODL-India. And all of them are deleted because they don't come under it. Irritated by it he came to my talk page. There he was explained as to why those uploads were copyvio. Both by me and @Ravensfire. We told him that as written in the Website policy you need to take permission from them via email for using it. User said that he has emailed. But today the user re-uploads the image that was deleted without getting email permission. He uploads File:License for uploading pictures.png (screenshot of the website), which once again is a copyvio. He cheerypicks what suits him and encircles the word Open Data Portal and ignores the Disclaimer written in top-left. Now both the privacy policy of this website and the website mentioned in the Disclaimer i.e. of Lower House of Indian Parliament say that Email permission is required for using its content. The user is repeatedly violating it.
Now all this means either of two things.

The user doesn't understand copyright and licensing.
The user is desperate to upload images knowingly ignoring the rules.

In either of the cases, The User is not made for Commons. Atleast for now. I leave the rest for you. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 16:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both the files are now deleted by @Yann. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 16:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering if an alternate approach here is to start a thread at COM:VPC about this and get some wider views on this. I get where George Simon Ohm (and the other editors that are uploading images for the members of parliment from the same India.gov site) are coming from, that it feels like these ought to be covered by the GODL. Yes, they saw something on the India.gov page about the open data project, and went with that idea. Maybe having a that discussion at VPC, pinging a few other people and putting the ideas from several AFD's and talk pages I've seen may help get a consensus view on if GODL applies and maybe get some helpful text added on COM:TAG India. Ravensfire (talk) 16:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire Is it possible to get GODL tag when the website clearly states that permission via email is required for using its content. And GODL-India is the tag for Government of India work. But Parliament doesnt come under Government of India. Neither does NIC. Then how is it possible. This was told to the user he replied that he has emailed. Then also he uploaded it under the same license which got deleted once. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 16:59, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your assumption is that the website is correctly labeled and that they are allowed to claim copyright on those images. I think that view is correct, but I also know that I'm far from an expert on the GODL and base my view on what others have posted in a few places. I haven't found a really good discussion around if GODL applies to these images or not, just a couple with a few people commenting. So maybe here we try to guide the editor, get this really answered and update the TAG India page to note that the GODL would not apply to those images. Ravensfire (talk) 17:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire That is a valid discussion. Just to tell you my view GODL-India is very much messed up. But here I have highlighted that despite explaining the user has violated the same thing again. The term Open Data Portal is a link and not license on that website which takes us to other NIC website. Before laying a claim he should have verified. And if he doesn't understand licensing and copyright then commons is not for him. That is my point.Shaan Sengupta^Talk 17:08, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi turelio,why o deleted files without copyright? Meruane file does not have copyright

The meruane file does not have copyright,and you have no proof that the other thing has copyright, because it doesn't. GokuJuan (talk) 20:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GokuJuan, you are talking about File:Ricardo Meruane.jpg, right? Well, that image was published already in 2015 on Twitter. So, what do you mean by "does not have copyright"? Content on Twitter is not under a free license (or without copyright). --Túrelio (talk) 07:03, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That image does not have any copyright, it was uploaded by the mayor of Viña del Mar, because that comedian appeared at the Vila del Mar festival shortly after that photo. GokuJuan (talk) 09:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the evidence for your claim "does not have any copyright"? --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The photo was taken in a public place, not on a television program, she did not take the photo, she only uploaded it publicly so that people knew who the comedian was who would perform at the Viña del Mar festival https:// es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Reginato she uploaded it and was mayor for many years and never said that the image had copyright GokuJuan (talk) 17:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Copyright doesn't work that way. These days/years any creative work is automatically copyrighted. Exceptions are works created by animals or AI-created works, and works created by the federal government of the U.S.. So, been taken in a public place is not relevant for copyright. Published in the web is also not relevant for copyright. Copyright usually lasts for 70 years after the death of the creator of the work; in some countries it's 50 years. It is not necessary to expressedly claim copyright or to put a (C) sign on it, copyright still exists.

So, on Commons we require for every upload, which is not understandably own work of the uploader, to provide verifiable evidence that its creator has released it under a Commons-compliant free license (CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, CC-Zero, PD, etc.). Some creators release their works under a free license on Flickr or similar platforms. In other cases a creator might grant a free license upon direct request, which then needs to be evaluated by our Permissions team. --Túrelio (talk) 18:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nochmals: WRB Cover

Hi Túrelio, es gibt schon wieder ein Problem: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WRB,_4th_edition,_Cover.jpg. Der Benztzer Moheen hat eine Warnung eingefügt. Ich habe ihm vor drei Tagen geantwortet: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Moheen. Bis jetzt habe ich keine Reaktion erhalten. Könntest du dich bitte der Sache annehmen. Vielen Dank. Eleutheropodic (talk) 15:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eleutheropodic,

das ist nicht wirklich eine Warnung, sondern eher eine Statusmeldung. Moheen gehört zur OTRS/VRT-Benutzergruppe, die sich um Permissions kümmern. Das braucht dir also keine Sorgen zu machen. --Túrelio (talk) 15:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Túrelio, okay, danke, aber was bedeutet dann der Satz "If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by a VRT agent, this file will be deleted." ? Eleutheropodic (talk) 11:54, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:ईटीवी.png

Hi, Túrelio. I'm sorry, but I have to post here again, because you deleted this file without responding to my two pings by giving a reason, and the deletion request was closed by a colleague of yours with "Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio," which is obviously not a deletion reason. I suppose you believe the file is over COM:TOO India, but why couldn't you state that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ikan,

no need to be sorry. I don't remember exactly, whether I had seen this file when it was still delete-tagged. It's more likely that I had seen it only after the nominator had escalated to speedy for copyvio (as contained logo is under fair-use on :en[12]) and had then acted on that speedy. Otherwise, I would have closed or at least commented in the DR.

So, if you want to "fight" for your argument "below TOO per Commons:Threshold of originality#India", I can undelete the file and re-open the DR. --Túrelio (talk) 14:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems worth consideration whether it is or is not over COM:TOO India. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So yes, please undelete the file and reopen the DR for full consideration, and thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madiha Imam.png

Hi Pal! Hope you are doing well! Can you please verify license for this image?Wallu2 (talk) 18:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amina_Okueva.jpg

Hi Túrelio, the image is a cropped version of File:Амина_Окуева_и_Джамала.jpg that you deleted with "Screenshot of non-free content (F3) and Facebook-code". If I'm interpreting it correctly it was a capture found on Facebook, am I right?. I'm asking because the text generated by {{Extracted from}} indicates that the cropped version is fine, but I don't think it is the case. Thanks. Günther Frager (talk) 19:03, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy revert

̴̴̃@Túrelio you reverted this edit [13]. Can I know where can I find the details about the licensing as I can't seem to find it. Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 13:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I should really get a compensation from the Vimeo-company. They hide the license-information so well, that with every 2nd Vimeo-upload this question occurs. ;-)

Go to [14] and lock in the area of the title for the word "More" or "Mehr", depending on your language-configuration, and click on it. Then a new box opens, where the license is displayed.--Túrelio (talk) 16:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Torres Strait Islanders

Thank you for SD-ing File:Torres Strait Islanders Flag.png. Shortly after it was deleted, I was editing in no-wiki and was surprised to see the same flag presented there in the form of this file. Will the same copyvio rules apply to that kind of 'badge design'? Then I started digging deeper and came across two more candidates for speedy deletion: File:トレス海峡諸島民の旗.png and File:Straattorres.png.

I thought it would be more efficient to go directly to you with this, since you are familiar with the copyright status of that particular flag. I hope that is OK. TU-nor (talk) 10:09, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've put the 1st one into a new DR; the 3rd one dupe-processed and the 2nd one speedy-tagged. --Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Buteo buteo in flight in the United Kingdom

Thanks for your interest in this category. I was using it because there was already a similar category for Milvus milvus in flight in Wales.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 11:36, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in fact I have only acted according to the speedy-tagging by Boylarva99. The edit-summary was his/hers. Or was your comment meant as a "hidden" restore-request? --Túrelio (talk) 12:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not hiding anything. I wondered whether the flying kites also need attention.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 13:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to restore the cat if you thinks it's needed. --Túrelio (talk) 13:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links on deleted files

I noticed that the provided link to 'Deletion_requests' on [15] is not clickable. An issue within the template? Wickey (talk) 13:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, when I enter URL https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:NVU_logo.png, I do get to Commons:Deletion requests/File:NVU logo.png. --Túrelio (talk) 13:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wickey: There is something odd here. There have been two files, File:NVU logo.png and File:NVU logo.svg. The png file was deleted in 2017 after a deletion request. The svg file has just been deleted by Túrelio. The page that you have linked to is connected to the svg file, but it points to the png file discussion with an unclickable link. Túrelio: Could it be that the link is manually added, but with single [ ] instead of double [[ ]]? That could explain it. --TU-nor (talk) 14:29, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not odd. For both files, the same reason is valid. An external link should be single [ ]. I could not find the source of the message-box.--Wickey (talk) 15:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but external links do not work in edit summaries, while wikilinks do, so to be clickable, it would have to be entered as [[Commons:Deletion_requests/File:NVU_logo.png]] and not as [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:NVU_logo.png]. --TU-nor (talk) 15:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see, I did not recognize it as an edit summary. BTW, the message-box at Commons:Deletion requests/File:NVU logo.png does not provide a link to the deletion discussion of that file, actually.--Wickey (talk) 10:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Logos associated with entertainment and leisure in Sweden

Hello. Category was moved to where? Eurohunter (talk) 22:36, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nochmals: WRB Cover

Hi Túrelio, danke für deine Antwort vom 6. Oktober, aber so richtig beruhigt bin ich nicht. Was bedeutet der Satz "If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by a VRT agent, this file will be deleted." Danke. Eleutheropodic (talk) 15:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Üblicherweise bedeutet das, was der Text sagt, also dass die Datei 30 Tage nach der 1. Antwort des VRT-Bearbeiters gelöscht wird, wenn keine gültige Genehmigung eingegangen ist. Hier liegt es aber doch anders, da ja in der verlinkten pdf-Datei eine generelle Genehmigung vorliegt. D.h., selbst im Fall, dass keine explizite Genehmigung positiv eintrifft, z.B. weil der mutmaßliche Lizenzgeber sich nicht meldet, würde ich die Datei auf jeden Fall in einen regulären LA (anstelle es SLA) stecken, um die o.g. gen. Genehmigung zu diskutieren. --Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Der Lizenzgeber Stefaan Dondeyne hat am 23.10. ein E-Mail an Moheen geschickt und nochmals die Freigabe bestätigt. Es kam keine Reaktion. Es sind nur noch 2 Tage, bis die 30 Tage vorbei sind. Kannst du etwas machen? Eleutheropodic (talk) 03:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eleutheropodic,

du brauchst dir wirklich nicht so viel Sorge zu machen. Die Datei trägt ja keinen no-permission-Baustein; dann wäre eine gewisse "Gefahr" gegeben. Eine Datei, die nur einen OTRS-pending-Baustein trägt, wird kein Admin einfach so löschen. Erst wenn ein OTRS/VRT-Bearbeiter sie mit einem speedy-Baustein versieht, steht eine Löschung an. Du kannst ja ggf. mal auf dem OTRS-Noticeboard nachfragen. Aber die OTRS/BRT-Bearbeiter sind fast immer überlastet. --Túrelio (talk) 17:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Túrelio, nun ist es doch passiert. Der WRB Cover wurde gelöscht. Stefaan Dondeyne hatte mir mittlerweile geschrieben, dass er Antwort von Moheen erhalten hatte, dieser ihm ein Formular geschickt hat, und er es ausgefüllt zurückgeschickt hat. Trotzdem wurde der Cover nun gelöscht. Aber wenn ich dich recht verstanden habe, hätte es dieses Formular sowieso gar nicht gebracht, weil ja das ganze Dokument open access ist. Könntest du das Problem bitte lösen und den Cover wiederherstellen. Danke. Eleutheropodic (talk) 17:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Meinst du jetzt eine andere Datei als die hier User talk:Krd#File:WRB, 4th edition, Cover.jpg behandelte? --Túrelio (talk) 17:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Túrelio, genau diese Datei meine ich. Danke fürs Erledigen. Ich mache jetzt also die Löschungen überall wieder rückgängig. ~ Eleutheropodic (talk) 16:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:AI generated media

Hi, Don't you think that keeping a redirect might be useful? The talk page redirects to Commons talk:AI-generated media. Yann (talk) 09:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

might be. However, it was speedy-tagged by the same user that had created it. Anyway, feel free to restore. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PD-Italy

Hello Túrelio,

Years ago, before to upload any photograph under PD-Italy, I deeply checked these PD-Italy rules with some Commons admins, such as Patrick Rogel (RIP) and recently as Racconish or Ruthven. They can confirm this point if you need. Except for a mistake (rivista with Genevieve Grad), the other file I usually upload under PD-Italy are controled and valid.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Racconish

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ruthven

Have a nice day. Tisourcier (talk) 13:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tisourcier,

feel free to invite them to the DR: If they comment over there, it has more value (for others) than on my talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 13:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To refer as another example :

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Louis_de_Fun%C3%A8s_%E2%80%94_L%27Homme_orchestre_(1970).jpg Tisourcier (talk) 13:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned deletion page

Hi, Túrelio, here is a orphaned deletion page to deal with. 0x0a (talk) 18:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:АэропортЛеонов1.jpg

Hi, Túrelio. Can I be interested this photo. I'm creater this photo and why did you delete it? You're deleted it allegedly for possible copyright violation: "no evidence of a free license at the claimed source". What? I'm eagerly waiting explanation from you! SlavaMK1 (talk) 11:14, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SlavaMK1,

hmm, File:АэропортЛеонов1.jpg was uploaded by User:Dnl plnsk and was deleted already on May 5th. Source had been given as https://spectrum-group.ru/mezhdunarodnyj-aeroport-kemerovo/ and author als "© Copyright 2023 Spectrum. All Rights Reserved." --Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the source and did not find the copyright holder of this photo on this resource. I honestly don’t know how the description of the photo was changed on Wikidata. Well, will you can restore it and return back? I would to sort out the file information if you restore this SlavaMK1 (talk) 18:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I cannot restore an image from a source that expressedly states "All Rights Reserved.", it would be a copyvio. Besides, you got already the source (it's the first of the 3 images). The rest of the description is meaningless, it says twice "© Copyright 2023 Spectrum. All Rights Reserved." --Túrelio (talk) 21:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quantico Marines Basketball 1955-56 Roster P02.jpg

Please delete this redirect. There is no reason to keep it. I accidently loaded the wrong file and requested it be deleted within minutes, so there are no uses of the file. Thanks! Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:20, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 13:37, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr-Duplikate

Hi @Túrelio, danke Dir für die Korrektur der beiden Flickr-Duplikate. Ich hatte lediglich anhand der Flickr-Bild-ID in Commons recherchiert, weil die häufig in den Namen übernommen wird. Mangels Treffern hatte ich dann angenommen, dass die beiden Bilder noch nicht auf Commons seien... Viele Grüße Fl.schmitt (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zora Mazora

Hallo Turelio, ich habe Robin Lambrecht erreicht, er hat bereits eine mail mit angehängten bildernd und urls an die angegebene mailadresse gesendet. Ich bitte noch um etwas geduld bevor die bilder gelöscht werden, ich habe ihn vorher nicht erreicht. danke, zora 2A02:810A:113F:83E4:E549:D5E0:DF25:990E 13:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, kein Problem. --Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:OleskivMI.png

You have removed the file. However, it belongs to a civil servant and is posted on the official website, so by law it is public information. 2 is the license specified "This file is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication ". Additional link https://www.tourism.gov.ua/management-bio, please restore the file. Inoveritas (talk) 11:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems I've overlooked the fineprint line below the image. The rest is irrelevant; "public information" does not translate into "no copyright". --Túrelio (talk) 12:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why

Hello Turélio, would you please tell me the reason why you deleted the category "Exterior of Zionskirche (Worpswede)" this morning? It was only empty because another user had emptied it before. I don't understand such a behaviour. When I created that deleted category some time ago, I had certain thoughts about that in my mind, it was no nonsense. Best regards --Maimaid (talk) 21:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Túrelio, more discussion can be found at User talk:Subbass1#Warum?. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 22:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Maimaid, ich habe die Kategorie gelöscht, weil sie leer und mit dem speedy-Baustein markiert war. Das speedy-Skript übernimmt automatisch die vom "Markierer" genannte Löschbegründung in die edit-summary. Eine gelöschte Kategorie kann auf Wunsch verlustlos wieder hergestellt werden; denn die Löschung ist ja (normalerweise) rein aus Wartungsgründen und nicht aus rechtlichen Gründen (wie z.B. copyvio) erfolgt. Es stehen täglich hunderte Kategorien zur Löschung an, fast immer, weil sie leer sind. Deshalb ist es kaum möglich jedesmal nachzuforschen, ob sie kurz vorher geleert wurde, zumal das nicht so einfach ist. Wenn du möchtest, stelle ich die o.g. Kategorie gerne wieder her. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio (diesmal richtig geschrieben),

dankeschön für die Erklärung. Dein Angebot, die Kategorie wieder herzustellen, nehme ich gerne an. Vielen Dank! Maimaid (talk) 10:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Herzlichen Dank! Maimaid (talk) 10:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brandt family.jpg

Can you delete it? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.233.237.136 (talk) 07:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Can you delete also File:Heinrich Berger.jpg? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.233.237.136 (talk • contribs)

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:18, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FN FAL in the Corps of Naval Fusiliers

What was so bad about this category? Deleting it and sending all of its pictures back to "FN FAL in Brazilian service" mixes up marines (all of whom can be identified as such through uniforms, file sources and even filenames) and policemen in the same unsorted category. It also means "FN FAL in the Brazilian Navy" is missing all of the aforementioned images of marines, who are part of the Navy. And yet simply moving those images to "FN FAL in the Brazilian Navy" would mix up marines and sailors, which is precisely why marines were given a subcategory. Serraria (talk) 11:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you are relating to Category:FN FAL in the Corps of Naval Fusiliers, you should discuss this with User:Tm, who requested this cat for deletion. I performed the deletion, as the cat was empty. --Túrelio (talk) 13:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I'll see what I can do. Serraria (talk) 16:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Serraria As you might as well know combat in the Caatinga is not a specialty of the Corpo de Fuzileiros Navais, as you mixed in that category several images of soldiers with clearly marked shoulder tabs with "Caatinga" on their uniforms, as yourself removed File:16 08 2021 Demonstração Operativa por ocasião da Operação Formosa - 2021 (51382832388).jpg, File:16 08 2021 Demonstração Operativa por ocasião da Operação Formosa - 2021 (51383615690).jpg, File:16 08 2021 Demonstração Operativa por ocasião da Operação Formosa - 2021 (51383331674).jpg, File:16 08 2021 Demonstração Operativa por ocasião da Operação Formosa - 2021 (51382588131).jpg and moved to "FN FAL in Brazilian Army" . Please, instead of automatically presuming that images where soldiers use an FN FAL and that are sourced from the Marinha do Brasil and depicted military exercises commandand by the Corpo de Fuzileiros Navais always depict soldiers from that unit and move all files, look first to see what branch of the brazilian armed forces is is fact depicted (or other foreign military). Cheers. @Túrelio Sorry for using your talkpage to answer to Serraria, instead of his talkpage. If needed be to continue this talk, other userpage can be used. Thanks. Tm (talk) 18:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem to continue the discussion here, if needed. --Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bad category of Lajos Szász

Dear Túrelio! Thank you very much for the quick action, the deletion! :-)) Hi! Bizottmány (talk) 10:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konstantine Anthony, 2022.jpg

I saw that you deleted this image back in September. I am obviously not a City of Burbank employee, but Template:PD-CAGov states that a work made by a government unit (including cities like Burbank) are public domain, so it shouldn't have been deleted in the first place unless there's a copyright from a non-employee photographer. I also don't like being called a "political party meat puppet for Anthony" just because of this. reppop^talk 06:23, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry you feel offended by the original nominator's deletion-rationale, which is adopted automatically into the edit-summary. Nominator User:Sleeplessmason had justified the deletion-request by "The uploader is not a City of Burbank employee and did not have permission from the City to upload this image. Verified with City of Burbank. ..." That seemed plausible enough for me.

If you absolutely insist, I can convert this from a speedy to a regular DR to allow for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PD-CAGov directly states that "It is a public record that was not created by an agency which state law has allowed to claim copyright, and is therefore in the public domain in the United States." Burbank as a city is not listed under "Agencies permitted to claim copyright". reppop^talk 14:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most California government websites have a copyright notice, including the State Senate and State Assembly, but from how I see it, they can't claim copyright due to California law. I fail to see how Burbank is different. reppop^talk 15:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add another line from Template:PD-CAGov: "County of Santa Clara v. CFAC held that the State of California, or any government entity which derives its power from the State, cannot enforce a copyright in any record subject to the Public Records Act in the absence of another state statute giving it the authority to do so. This applies even if there is a copyright notice, so long as the State of California or one of its agencies is indicated as the copyright holder." So the copyright notice doesn't contradict it, as it directly says that even if it had it, its still public domain. reppop^talk 07:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, since now I'm in a discussion where that very editor is still calling me "biased" for uploading this, it's was undeleted for the same reasoning as mine back in November. Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2023-11#File:Konstantine_Anthony,_2022.jpg reppop^talk 21:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

banners

Good morning. A few years ago I used this photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MotherTeresa_094-1(cropped).jpg to create graphics for a procession with saints. Various saints are included in this graphic. Unfortunately, I didn't sign it :( maybe I didn't pay attention to it, I'm very sorry. I changed these photos in the digital versions, there are printed versions on a banner, where about 60 banners informing about the campaign are displayed every year. How can I compensate for the lack of a signature? Adrianperec1990 (talk) 14:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

deletions

Can you delete "Leonhard von Moellendorff", "Franz Herber (Offizier)", "Franz Herber (officer)", and "Kurt Salterberg"? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.207.178.46 (talk) 14:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the redirect. Can you do also the other three for copyrigh violation? 95.234.110.185 09:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Can you do also the last one, "Leonhard von Moellendorff"? 95.234.110.185 11:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 95.234.110.185 11:59, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since there isn't any files, can you delete also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Leonhard_von_M%C3%B6llendorff? Thank you. 95.248.233.195 12:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Нурлан_Камитов_(архитектор).jpg

Good afternoon! You deleted the media file for the reason: Copyright violation: https://vlast.kz/novosti/28897-kazahstanskij-arhitektor-stal-pocetnym-clenom-korolevskogo-instituta-britanskih-arhitektorov.html On this website, it is written under the photo that it was provided by INK Architects - the founder of this company is the person in this photo - Nurlan Kamitov. Before that, the photo was published on Wikimedia Commons under a license. Could you restore this file Филатова Елена (talk) 14:29, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Филатова Елена,

User:Нелли Ергалиева uploaded this image as "own work" in 2022 and claimed it to be from 2020. However, the user, who nominated it for deletion, had found it prepublished already in 2018 under the above linked publication, which credits it to "INK Architects". The latter fact makes the "own work"-claim by our uploader unplausible. If the image is important for wikipedia, the best solution would be to contact INK Architects and ask them whether they are able and willing to release the image under a free license, such as the claimed cc-by-sa license, and confirm that to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 17:44, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Hi Túrelio hope you are doing good ? Can you review my uploads

Thanks Pp01902 (talk) 11:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions

Can you delete "File:Heinrich Berger (1905-1944).jpg", "File:General von Kortzfleisch.png", and "File:Franz J. Müller.gif" as requested for copyright violation? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.20.12.95 (talk) 11:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The latter 2 can't be speedied, as they are in the ongoing Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ushiwaka1189. --Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Can you delete also "File talk:Heinrich Berger (1905-1944).jpg"? 95.239.125.208 10:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you can delete also the latter 2. 193.207.134.32 18:13, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delete them? 79.17.233.177 09:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Precision1

Can you also delete this page? 阿南之人 (talk) 15:20, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wasim Sajjad.png

Hi! Hope you are doing well! Can you please verify license for this image? Wallu2 (talk) 16:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overwriting

Hi. I'm not sure if you'll be able to help but recently I'm not able to overwrite images when using CropTool. I get the following message: "Upload failed! [api] Received error: abusefilter-disallowed : ⧼abusefilter-warning-file-overwriting⧽". Any ideas how I could fix this or who to get in touch with for help? Many thanks in advance. ArturSik (talk) 14:01, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ArturSik,

sorry, but I never used the CropTool and there have no experience with it. When I want to crop an image, I usually use the freeware IrfanView and its lossless crop-function. --Túrelio (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No worries. Thanks anyway for replying. I will try my luck at Help desk. All the best to you :) ArturSik (talk) 14:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded again

File:Natashia Williams-Blach 2013 Fitness Expo Press Photo.jpg — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 21:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lost redirected file

Dear Túrelio,

I can not find a file that has been redirected. The original file name is File:0-02-05-6a8b280f92fb4b281f6afb5aa20cb7422da8aa29dfd8f25ebaf9c73aa84a8163 48498c82422e2649.jpg.

Is there a possibility that the overall file was deleted? And if yes, why?

Best regards, Dandarmkd (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dandarmkd,

you are correct. The redirect seems to have been nosense from the beginning, as there is no evidence that a file with the target-filename ever existed. I've therefore restored the original file and deleted the redirect. You should check whether the requested renaming makes sense. I could then perform it. --Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Túrelio,

I think it would be the best to move the file, just like the uploader requested. Plus the original name of the file is not very suitable. The new proposed name is more adequate than the actual name.

Dandarmkd (talk) 09:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ludwig_Feldgen.jpg

Der Uploader ist doch nicht der Urheber mit der Lizenz CC40, oder? Welcher Lizenzbaustein braucht das Bild? Atamari (talk) 14:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hab den Hochlader mal nach der Quelle gefragt. --Túrelio (talk) 15:20, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joko Widodo

@Túrelio Hi, you recently deleted a photo: Presiden-jokowi-disambut-oleh-presiden-ukraina-volodymyr-zelenskyy.jpg. However, I got that from a reliable source and they allow distribution. See https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/glava-derzhavi-proviv-peregovori-z-prezidentom-indoneziyi-ya-76133, and at the bottom of the website says "All materials featured on this site are is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International. The use of any materials posted on the website is permitted provided you link to www.president.gov.ua regardless of full or partial use of materials." What was the reason you deleted the photo? Can you please undo? Legitaxi (talk) 04:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Legitaxi: ,

material licensed under NC, ND or NC+ND are not considered free enough per our policy COM:L. That was the reason for the deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:FBI exhibit - Joe Biggs in the Capitol on January 6, 2021.png

@Túrelio You recently deleted this image as a repost of the content deleted after Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joe Biggs from DOJ Case Number 1-21-cr-175 Biggs - Affidavit.png, which was deleted because it was not actually in the source provided, meaning we couldn't verify it's origin or copyright status. Only having seen the discussion after the deletion, I took the time to track down the original source and confirm it's PD-USGov. I would appreciate if you would restore it. Feoffer (talk) 01:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pleas see Commons:Deletion requests/File:FBI exhibit - Joe Biggs in the Capitol on January 6, 2021.png. --Túrelio (talk) 07:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can we do something about this?

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gajendra Singh Shekhawat official portrait Lok Sabha.jpg this has been nominated for deletion discussion since 29 October 2023. And its been 15 days since last comment. You and others have deleted files uploaded from same website which are not its product but of Parliament's. At first I thought that discussion was not needed but then I was corrected. But now I am concerned on the slow pace of action. Please see if you can do something about it. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 13:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio I removed things that have been dealt with. Hope there is nothing wrong since noone replied to it yet. But the primary concern I came here with still stands. The deletion discussion which is not progressing and the two votes that are there have called for deletion. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:45, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alipay logo.svg

Hi, Túrelio. I plan to add this logo to the TOO China case, because it has already passed copyright registration in China. Could you please check the download link for me? Thanks in advance. 0x0a (talk) 07:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it had already been deleted by a colleague of mine. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I mean the source URL. 0x0a (talk) 08:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At the source, https://gw.alipayobjects.com/os/rmsportal/trUJZfSrlnRCcFgfZGjD.ai, a collage of many logos is shown. Is this intended for the page where you want to link it? Otherwise, a link to the single logo might be better, if available. --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I'll to extract it and upload to the archive.org. 0x0a (talk) 09:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Borrado de la "Bandera_del_Frente_Popular_de_Liberación_de_Palestina.svg".

El trabajo NO está basado en la obra que referís (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_of_PFLP.png), sino en en el logo directamente publicado por la propia organización en su web https://pflp.ps/thumb/290x290/style/assets/images/logopflp.png, y en las fotos publicadas en esta web en que sale su bandera. En este otro sitio hay una buena cantidad de imágenes de la bandera y del logo, https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/ps%7Dpflp.html Es bastante obvio que el logo no es propiedad de quien lo subió en su momento, y que se trata de un error al elegir la licencia de uso, o peor, de un intento malicioso de impedir que el logo se pueda utilizar en la wikipedia Solicito sea revertido el cambio y repuesto mi trabajo, que no está basado en el que se referencia. Iskraelectrica (talk) 09:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion-rationale, as presented in the deletion/edit-summary is not from me, but by the original nominator User:Thespoondragon, however, it seemed plausible to me. Anyway, if the logo is from https://pflp.ps, well, that site claims "جميع الحقوق محفوظة © 2023 - الجبهة الشعبية". No evidence of a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 09:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Entonces es evidente que se trata de impedir maliciosamente la disfusión en la wiki del logo y la bandera del Frente Popular de Liberación de Palestina. El logo que dice tener en propiedad es exactmente el que aparece en la web de la organización, es evidente que quien incumple es quien se arroga la propiedad del logo de una organización, el cual es anterior a la propia existencia de la wikipedia y del sitio web (https://www.comitelulalivre.org/en/popular-front-for-the-liberation-of-palestine-free-lula/) que se referencia para la propiedad intelectual del mismo, que es más que probable que fuera sacado de la web del FPLP. En todo caso debería borrarse este, y reponer los demás. Yo no tengo inconveniente alguno que la propiedad intelectual de mi trabajo se asigne al FPLP

Iskraelectrica (talk) 09:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you have repeatedly accused me of bad intentions, violating our policy COM:AGF, I am not willing to communicate with you further. Submit your request Commons:Undeletion requests. EoD. --Túrelio (talk) 11:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disculpa si has entendido que la acusación de malicia iba dirigida a ti, estaba dirigida a quien se arrogaba los derechos sobre el logo y bandera objeto de la discusión que hablamos. Iskraelectrica (talk) 14:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Mikhail_Kozlovsky._Selected_(2014-03-21)_08.jpg&redirect=no

Зачем вы удалили этот файл, заменив его на фальшивку с подложной лицензией? --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 15:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because it has been tagged by the dupe-bot and File:МБ.jpg was 7 years older. If you knew the latter has a fake-license, why didn't you tag it as copyvio? --Túrelio (talk) 15:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete of Kenes Rakishev and John Dodelande.jpg

hello, im so sorry, please remove this image for me. Jokerman4 (talk) 18:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done already by a colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 23:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of LeAnna Cumber headshot 2022

Hi, I uploaded LeAnna's picture to her wiki page at her request. It is a photo that she and others use often. What do I need to do to keep it on her bio page? I am not a big editor and mainly joined to update pages for the Cumbers. (I'm their assistant). Any help is appreciated. MercyDaye (talk) 16:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, we are talking about File:LeAnna Headshot 2022.jpg, right? You claimed it to be own work, which you can do legitimately only, if you are the photographer, which seems not to be the case. If you are Mrs. Cumber's assistant, you should ask her (or her legal dep., if available), who is the photographer of this shot and who owns the copyright (per default the photographer; though, he/she may give it to others). If the copyright is still with the photographer, Mrs. Cumber (or her laywer) needs to obtain full copyright from the photographer, in order to release this image under a free license. Else, you could ask the photographer whether he would agree to release this image under a free license, which allows anybody else to use the image for free, though the photographer always needs to be credited. If Mrs. Cumber already has the copyright bought or transferred from the photographer to her, she by herself can release the image under a free license, as is required for uploads to Commons/Wikipedia.

To document the release of an image under a free license, go to Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file and copy the text in the box/rectangle to a word-processor, enter the filename of the image and fill-in the variable fields (w. square brackets). Then, you should send/give the finalized release-text to the rightsholder, who wants to give the permission. He/She then nees to put his/her name and the date under it and send it directly (own email-account; no forwarding) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). The email will not be made public and only our OTRS-volunteers have access to it. They will check the permission and likely confirm it and then put a permission-tag ("ticket") on the image-page (or undeleted the image, if already deleted). --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User talk:Nanyongaa for a discussion about File:Dr. Balaam Barugahara Ateenyi.jpg now deleted

The editor considers the upload to have been valid. I disagree. I felt I ought to show you this discussion since you are the deleting admin. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 09:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect request

Hi. Is it possible to redirect File:Joanna Kulig signature.jpg to File:Joanna Kulig signature.png as only the background has been removed and there is no use for the original? Many thanks ArturSik (talk) 12:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Much appreciated. ArturSik (talk) 13:48, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2023

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--20:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restore user talk page

Hi, Túrelio. User:Jungan1104‎ is blaming for tagging the files he uploaded as copyvio. He also requested and deleted his talk page. Can it be restored so anyone can get the facts? 0x0a (talk) 13:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I found the user-talkpage well in place. Did you mean their userpage? They can indeed delete that one, if they want. --Túrelio (talk) 14:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean user-talkpage, which was deleted few days ago. 0x0a (talk) 14:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted user talk pages cannot be permanently restored. Jungan1104 (talk) 04:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect file

Hello, can you restore this file, because it is upside down? This should be redirected to this, not the other way around. Regards, Exagren (talk) 03:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions requested

"Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ushiwaka1189" ("General von Kortzfleisch.png", "Franz J. Müller.gif"), "Koyata Yamamoto – group photo (1956).jpg", "Shinano Bridge Movie Institute opening ceremony, 13 April 1924.jpg" (Error: he isn't Koyata Yamamoto).

Thank you

Thank you for sorting out all those duplicate scarecrow pictures from Geograph. When I upload them, the system does not always tell me that they are duplicates, so your patience in this task is much appreciated. Storye book (talk) 09:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion page

Hi Túrelio, thanks for deleting User talk:Nilo1926/common.js. Is it possible to delete the page too? If I inserted the deletion template in User talk:Nilo1926/common.js I don't think it works, is that correct? Have a nice day and thank you again. Nilo1926 (talk) 08:08, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, "possible to delete the page too" - do you refer to User:Nilo1926/common.js ? --Túrelio (talk) 11:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert description page

File:Tia Ballard (53285376858).jpg 's description was messed up by BigBoss8969, please revert to the previous version. Thank you. 0x0a (talk) 10:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. However, you don't need to be an admin to do that. --Túrelio (talk) 11:12, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. I thought the admin could restore it with one click. 0x0a (talk) 11:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, as description and file "run parallel". Actually, an admin-colleague had already reverted the file-version, but likely hadn't seen that the vandal had also messed up the description. --Túrelio (talk) 11:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bot: Eliminando "Innovación_Low-tech.jpg". Borrado en Commons por Túrelio. (Copyright violation: The website given as the source is marked "©Copyright 2022 Low-tech Nation, tous droits réservés")

Please upload the image again, thank you. CorneliaSupera (talk) 17:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't understand your argument. Even if the image had been taken from lowtechnation.com, there is still the problem of copyright. If you are a representative of "Low-tech Nation", as suggested by your wording "our", you should ask the legal department or representative of "Low-tech Nation" to confirm the choosen free license (cc-by-sa-4.0}) for said image to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), provided "Low-tech Nation" has obtained the full copyright from authors Arthur Keller and Emilien Bournigal. --Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heinz Grill.jpg

Hi Turelio, today, 5. Dez. 2023 14:51 you deleted the File:Heinz Grill.jpg (Copyright violation). I didn't upload it, but used it in an article. The image had been uploaded by another user with the note that it was his own work. What was the copyright infringement? Robert Lindermayr (talk) 15:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, der Grund war, dass das Bild aufgrund einer Reihe von hits in Google-Images als copyvio-suspected markiert worden war, z.B. hier: https://www.kinderyoga-heute.de/yoga%20fuer%20erwachsene.htm . In solchen Zweifelsfällen wird gemäß COM:PCP gelöscht. Wenn du glaubwürdige Information hast, dass die Angabe des Hochladers doch stimmen könnte; kann ich das Bild in eine reguläre Löschdiskussion stecken. --Túrelio (talk) 17:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok; ja, man sieht, dass dieses Bild des Öfteren benutzt wird.

Ich wollte noch eine Frage an dich richten, ohne einen neuen Abschnitt zu eröffnen: Bei verschiedenen hochgeladenen Scans von Fotos eines nicht mehr aufgelegten Yogabuches wurde heute bei mir ein Vermerk gesetzt "Der Autor des Buches ist offensichtlich nicht der Fotograf, und der Hochlader auch nicht, es fehlt also die Genehmigung des Fotografen" Ich habe definitiv die Erlaubnis des Ausführenden der Asana und Autors, aber bisher nicht die des Fotographen, das ist richtig.

Die Argumentation erscheint logisch. Kannst du sie auch bestätigen?
Wenn ja. Zu jedem Vermerk bei den einzelnen Scans ist ja die Möglichkeit verlinkt, über einen Freigabe-Assistenten die Angaben zu machen. Relativ am Anfang bei diesem Assistenten besteht die Möglichkeit, zu einer Datei weitere hinzufügen. Später kommt der Punkt, an dem der Fotograph mit Mailadresse anzugeben ist. Ist das ok, wenn ich das so mache? Kann ich mir also viel Arbeit sparen und auf einmal für alle Fotos den Fotographen und seine Zustimmung angeben?

Robert Lindermayr (talk) 20:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-duplicate deleted using duplicate tag.

Túrelio,

Temporarily undelete please this so I can see the file again. I have may have a question or two. Thanks, --Ooligan (talk) 20:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ooligan, here you are: File:Tripolitza.png. --Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ooligan (talk) 16:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Túrelio, this File:tripolitza.png is not an "exact duplicate" of the current redirected file. One map is in French language and the other in German. So, these two maps are similar, but NOT the same.

German map- File:Tripolis Arkadien BV043560203.jpg map is dated 1805 by the source here: [16].

French map- File:tripolitza.png map is dated between 1798 and 1801 by the source here: [17]

Please, restore this file by reversing the redirect.

I have reverted one smaller version (overwritten) to the original and bigger version, which I then cropped out the blank area.

I left a message here: User talk:Enyavar#You tagged a duplicate that is not an exact duplicate. These files should never have been nominated under the "exact duplicate" process. Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 08:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated 'Thank You' for helping me save this unique file Túrelio. Best Regards, -- Ooligan (talk) 04:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect zurücknehmen

Hallo Túrelio, in der Stadt Bamberg steht die Neue Residenz, die u.a. die Staatsgalerie Bamberg beherbergt, die wiederum Teil der Bayerischen Staatsgemäldesammlung ist. Leider wurde die Category:Staatsgalerie Bamberg verschoben nach Category:Residenzmuseum Bamberg. Es gibt aber kein Residenzmuseum Bamberg. Wie kann der ursprünglich korrekte Zustand wiederhergestellt werden? Siehe hierzu auch Wikidata Q29343359 (Staatsgalerie in der Neuen Residenz Bamberg). Nemracc (talk) 21:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Nemracc,

den Logs nach scheint die Category:Staatsgalerie Bamberg nie wirklich genutzt worden zu sein. Sie wurde von User:Jane023 am 26.6.2015 bereits als redirect erstellt. Es wäre jedenfalls gut, wenn du Umsetzung auf den "neuen" bzw. eigentlich korrekten Cat-Namen auf der Disku der alten bzw. eher inkorrekten Cat thematisierst bzw. ankündigst. Falls keine Diskussion aufkommt, scheint es mir angemessen, 1 Woche später die Umsetzung durchzuführen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, wie von Dir vorgeschlagen habe ich am 7. Januar die Rücknahme des redirect von Category:Staatsgalerie Bamberg auf Category:Residenzmuseum Bamberg auf beiden Diskussionseiten vorgeschlagen - bis jetzt keine Resonanz. Da ich bald eigene Bilder bzgl. der Staatsgalerie Bamberg hochladen werde, möchte ich vorher das redirect zurück nehmen. Wie wird der redirect also zurück genommen? Muss ich vorher alle Kategorien und files verschieben auf Category:Staatsgalerie Bamberg? Vorab Danke für jegliche Hilfe! Nemracc (talk) 19:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nemracc,

den redirect habe ich nun entfernt, allerdings ist die cat-Datei noch leer. Sie hatte ja auch nie als solche existiert. Könnte nun der komplette Inhalt von Category:Residenzmuseum Bamberg dort hineinkopiert werden (also ist das sachlich richtig?)? --Túrelio (talk) 19:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hab jetzt mal die Inhalte herübergeschoben. Du müsstest dasselbe noch mit den in der alten cat enthaltenen Dateien machen. Was noch nicht klappt, ist die Zuordnung auf WikiData, obwohl ich dort das cat-Ziel korrigiert habe. --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dann werde ich jetzt über cat-a-lot die restlichen files nach Staatsgalerie Bamberg verschieben. Danke für die Unterstützung. Nemracc (talk) 19:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nachtrag wegen "sachlich richtig": Die restlichen files die noch in der "alten" Kategorie Residenzmuseum z. Z. sind, gehören alle in die Staatsgalerie Bamberg.

Images License

Hi can you verify these image licenses please! File:Babar azam 2023.jpg File:M Rizwan.jpg.Wallu2 (talk) 17:14, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stawky Muchawka.png

Hi. The user does not understand the rules of Commons. This must be stopped. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reloading deleted file (User:Polarlys). The third time. --Микола Василечко (talk) 22:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for File delete 'File:Akhtarul Iman Official Portrail.jpg'

The reason of file delete is (Copyright violation: Source website says their work is copyrighted) but in reference where it says that the violation of copyright? I am providing you the reference here.

Constituency no		Cons Name	MLA name	Gender	Party	contact	email Id
56		Amour	Akhtarul Iman	Male_	AIMIM	9431267572	mla-amour-bih@nic.in

please go through it. and do the needful Thank you.

Eaglespirit (talk) 07:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Eaglespirit What do you anticipate being done? There is no licencing on the link you have provided. No onward licencing means it is not licenced or onward use.

Also "and do the needful" is not polite. If you hope for people to offer assistance I suggest a better approach. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 18:01, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have the knowledge to judge these

Please will you examine https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Eaglespirit&ilshowall=1 and consider the large number of maps. I do not have the knowledge to know whether these are allowed here. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose an alternative would be for me to nominate them all as requiring permission. That might settle it. I'd just rather not create work for someone else if I can avoid doing do with advice. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kenkichi Tomimoto

"Tomimoto family.jpg" and "Tomimoto couple.jpg" are very better and sufficient for his family, then can you delete "Kenkichi Tomimoto and his daughter, beginning of 1917.jpg", "Kenkichi Tomimoto, his family and his mother in front of his workshop, 1918.jpg", "Kenkichi Tomimoto and his family, end of 1917.jpg"? And also "Kenkichi Tomimoto (left) with unknown, circa 1917.jpg" and "Kenkichi Tomimoto in front of his house, circa 1918.jpg"? Thank you. --Shirogane10 (talk) 09:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shirogane10,

the proper way to eventually have them deleted is a regular deletion-request, but not to tag images as duplicates when they aren't. --Túrelio (talk) 09:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but can you just delete them? --Shirogane10 (talk) 09:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No; it requires a discussion, as they have been uploaded under a free license already some time ago. An immediate deletion is only possible by request of uploader within 7 days after upload (or if there are other reasons for speedy deletion per our policies). --Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arnold Schönberg Variationen für Orchester op. 31 excerpt.mp3

Hi, did you accidentally put this file in the undeletion category for the wrong year? Thanks for checking! Gnom (talk) 10:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also ich ich hatte die Datei am 16.1.2022 wiederhergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 14:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alois Vladislav Vraný, Motlitba (1881).jpeg

Hi, Why was this deleted? The file is in the public domain. Is there anything else not mentioned in the DR? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:11, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I had deleted it, based on the uploaders request "Speedydelete|uploader request deletion, copyright violation". However, it seems I hadn't noticed the previous editwarring. --Túrelio (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Twilight of Idols, The Case of Wagner, Nietzsche Contra Wagner.djvu

This file has been re-uploaded with the problematic content removed; can you please restore the deleted metadata? Thanks :) Beleg Tâl (talk) 22:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Corrupt Geograph files?

Hi, why did you delete these files?

They all look fine to me. Multichill (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't really remember, as this was 2 months ago. Per the logs, they all had been tagged {{SD|F7}} within 7 days of upload. Feel free to restore them, as this was anyway a weak rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing wrong with these files. Don't you check files before you delete them? Multichill (talk) 19:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I might have mistaken the F7 for a G7. Anyway, my fault. --Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photo de René Levy sociologue

Bonjour, Vous avez retiré le 9 décembre dernier une photo de Commons intitulée "René_Levy_sociologue.jpg". Il s'agit d'une photo qui a été faite par un photographe lors d'une manifestation scientifique. Ce photographe nous a aimablement donné la photo en étant d'accord pour que cette photo soit intégrée dans Commons et Wikipédia en licence libre. J'ai inséré cette photo en donnant le lien du photographe. Votre argument pour supprimer cette photo est de dire que le lien n'est pas clair, que cette photo n'est pas visible. La photo n'étant effectivement pas au bout du lien donné, que faut-il faire pour que ce lien soit plus clair à vos yeux. Meilleures salutations. Jean-Marie Le Goff (talk) 15:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jean-Marie Le Goff: Bonjour,

Je me permets de répondre ici en français. Le photographe doit envoyer une autorisation par email. Voyez COM:VRT/fr pour les détails. N'hésitez pas à me demander si vous avez besoin d'aide. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I take the liberty to answer here in French. The photographer should send a permission by email. Please see COM:VRT for the details. Do not hesitate to ask me if you need help. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Yann. --Túrelio (talk) 14:59, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License Review

Hi Can you please review license of these:

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image-replacement nit

You set File:Mystetskyi Arsenal.png as a redirect to File:Mystetskyi Arsenal logo.svg. Obviously the appearance was the same, but the filetype is conceptually different. Should it have been deleted outright instead? I noticed it when the CommonsDelinker request for it was flagged as out-of-process. DMacks (talk) 20:06, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Photo

Hello, You deleted the file anthonysilva3.jpg yesterday because you said it was not sourced from the individual's social media account. In an attempt to determine what you were talking about, I utilized Google Lens as well which only turned up the photo on on a website called Capital Radio who indicated they sourced it from the person's LinkedIn. Since this is also a social media account, I feel you're splitting hairs here as the person's LinkedIn is now defunct. Despite this, I re-uploaded it, indicating it's from LinkedIn. I can also link you the original, public Facebook post from 2012 if you'd like to see it. Additionally, I don't understand your comment that it came from the 2010's which would include the year 2012. DreadPirateRoberts1 (talk) 23:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, neither Facebook nor LincedIn are legitimate sources for uploads to Commons, as they are not under a free license. In addition, the above cited edit-summary/deletion-rationale were not by me, but by the image-tagger User:メイド理世. Anyway, there is no evidence for this image being under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Collezione Microbica.jpg

Plase reestore this image, Stefania is clearly the author. Just ask, there is no need to hurry. We were also preparing a post about it. Hours of time lost for soething that could have been solved just putting a warning template and a starting deletion procedure. Users who share high qualty photo should be encouraged. Plus, she is an established account not a newbie, it would have been more logic to simply ask. Good photographers ashare photos on line, it's 2023.

In any case you know her father is at the hospital now, probably dying? Under Christmas. She took few hours to share a good quality photo and that's how we treat her. I love these wonderful Christmas stories, they really cheer me up. Put it back with a warning, we have already made enough fuzz for nothing here. Alexmar983 (talk) 16:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

* Happy Holidays! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [reply]

*ೃ༄ Feliz Navidad, Túrelio *ೃ༄

Merry Christmas and a joyous new year filled with peace, love, and happiness!
Щасливого Різдва та Нового року, нехай він принесе мир, любов та радість у ваше життя!
Joyeux Noël et une Bonne année pleine de paix, d'amour et de bonheur!
¡Feliz Navidad y un próspero año nuevo lleno de paz, amor y felicidad!
Buon Natale e un felice anno nuovo pieno di pace, amore e felicità!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr voller Frieden, Liebe und Glück!
Feliz Natal e um Ano Novo próspero repleto de paz, amor e felicidade!
メリークリスマス、そして平和と愛、幸福に満ちた新年おめでとうございます！
메리 크리스마스와 평화, 사랑, 행복이 가득한 새해 복 많이 받으세요!
मेरी क्रिसमस और शांति, प्रेम, और खुशियों से भरा नया साल मुबारक हो!
圣诞快乐，新年快乐，愿你的生活充满和平、爱与幸福！
عيد ميلاد مجيد وسنة جديدة سعيدة مليئة بالسلام والحب والسعادة!
С Рождеством и Новым Годом, пусть они принесут мир, любовь и счастье в вашу жизнь!
God Jul och Gott Nytt År fyllt med fred, kärlek och lycka!
Vrolijk Kerstfeest en een Gelukkig Nieuwjaar vol vrede, liefde en geluk!

Wilfredor

--Wilfredor (talk) 12:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag Túrelio,
Ich wünsche Dir ein gesegnetes Weihnachtfest.
Für das neue Jahr 2024 alles erdenklich Gute
und hoffentlich eine friedvollere Menschheit.
Vielen Dank für die vielseitige Hilfe, die Du mir zukommen lässt.
Beste Grüße.
Orchi (talk) 18:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greetings!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Túrelio, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024.
Happy editing,
A1Cafel (talk) 09:07, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

A1Cafel (talk) 09:07, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! 🎉

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Túrelio, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024.
Happy editing,
// sikander { talk } 🦖 22:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

// sikander { talk } 🦖 22:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

04IMG 8681

Would you mind renaming the files to something meaningful Trade (talk) 13:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; OptimusPrimeBot had tagged these images wrongly. --Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean Trade (talk) 17:21, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Said bot had tagged many/all of these as duplicates, without taking into account of the filename. Therefore, I had inadvertently moved from "meaningless/descriptive filename" to "meaningless filename". Now all reverted. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kenkichi Tomimoto

"Kenkichi Tomimoto and unknown.jpg" and "Kenkichi Tomimoto and Shin'ichi Sasagawa.jpg" were very better without the dates: those are sufficient in the summary for the files. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirogane10 (talk • contribs) 09:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Can you delete also "Kenkichi Tomimoto (left) with unknown, circa 1917.jpg", "Kenkichi Tomimoto (right) with unknown, circa 1917.jpg", and "Kenkichi Tomimoto and Shinichi Sasagawa, circa 1917-1918.jpg"? Shirogane10 (talk) 15:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gugerell

Hallo Turelio, kannst du bitte bei User:Gugerell auch den Baustein wie bei User:Manfred Kuzel ergänzen, sonst sieht man auf seiner Seite nicht, dass er leider nimmer ist. danke lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 13:44, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

danke -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 15:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Absent for 1 week

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 17:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tous mes voeux pour cette nouvelle année, Túrelio !
―Tisourcier

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thanks for your continued efforts in cleaning up Copyright infringements. 0x0a (talk) 05:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How does copyright on photos of a city/buildings work?

Two photos that I took of the Chicago skyline from the Willis Tower observation deck were taken down by you because someone sent a report with links to articles from several years ago featuring different copyrighted and non-copyrighted images of the same buildings which look to be taken from the same observation deck with the same angle/focal length. The photos show the same buildings, but they were very clearly taken in different seasons and in different years (with new buildings in the photos I took not appearing in the other ones). In other words, it is very evident (to human eyes?) that they are not the same photos.

Is this alone enough to be considered a copyright violation? I see city pictures all over Wikipedia and after reading the basic FAQ's I assumed there would be no problem, especially given that thousands of people visit that observation deck every day and take basically the same photos. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:East_Randolph_Street,_Chicago_November_2023.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Northern_Chicago_Skyscrapers_November_2023.jpg Ee100duna (talk) 03:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, seems I overlooked the differences between the uploaded and the external images. Now restored. However, you credited "Robert Barthell" for both images, as you did for 2 other uploads. If that is your real name and if you don't bother it to be disclosed, it might be good (recommended) to put it also on your userpage. Otherwise, patrolers may assume that you uploaded Mr. Robert Barthell's images, but that you are a different person. --Túrelio (talk) 10:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had already determined they should be kept

Hi. It isn't helpful when an admin makes a decision to keep an empty category allowed within the criteria, then when the user reverts an admin, the next admin just comes along and deletes the category. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. However, as the deletion seemed to be uncontroversial to me (C2), I hadn't checked the edit-history. By the way, it's still speedy-tagged now. --Túrelio (talk) 14:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelled redirect

Hi Túrelio,
Is it possible to have [this redirect] deleted ?
It's just been created but I omissed "file:" at the beginning of the file name… --Kontributor 2K (talk) 18:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,--Kontributor 2K (talk) 07:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Armoirie imaginaire de Charlemagne.

Hi @Túrelio, i send you his message in order to know where you have seen the picture of Blason aigle fleurs de lys.png on this site ː https://wappenwiki.org/index.php/Main_Page because i didn't see it... I therefore consider that there is no violation of rights. Can you explain your point of view to me please. Yours sincerely. ̴̴ Cjldx (talk) 06:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the file hadn't been tagged by me, but by another user. However, the link to the hit is https://wappenwiki.org/index.php?title=File:Charlemagne.svg . --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your answer and the link. It's a free interpretation that inspired the original model, not quite a pure and simple copy. What do you think about ? Is it really a Copyright violation ? ON the site the licence is "CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 Deed". I don't really know the term of these licence. Would you want, to explain me, please ? ̴̴ Cjldx (talk) 08:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, formally per our policy COM:L we only accept freely-licensed works. NC is a restriction (no commercial use) of the CC-license, which is not allowed on Commons (if it's the only license). Now, whether this coat-of-arms is indeed to be considered an original work of art which is still in copyright might be a matter of debate. To proof otherwise would require quite some substantial research. If you want to do that, I could put the file into a regular deletion-discussion, which allows a debate. --Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

27 January 2023: deleted page File:Οι εκτοπίσεις των Εβραίων από την Ελλάδα.jpg, Copyright violation

@Túrelio

Hello, In January 2023 (below the information), you removed a map that I integrated into a historical article on wikipedia. I am the author of this map and I indicate the sources of my book. My publisher is also aware that I am going to include this map. I don't understand why it was removed. Can it be reintroduced? Thank you for your help.

Ηere the informations: 16:39, 27 January 2023 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page File:Οι εκτοπίσεις των Εβραίων από την Ελλάδα.jpg (Copyright violation: The file's description mentions as souce "from Anastasios Karambaba's book In the footsteps of the Jews of Greece (Psychogios Publications, 2022). Design: Anastasios Karambabas, Romuald Cardinal, Adelaïde Naxos-Allalou". It is unlikely that the uploader is connecter in some way with the creators.) (thank) (global usage; delinker log) Anastasios Karababas (talk) 16:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anastasios Karababas ,

said file had be uploaded to Commons in 2022 by User:IstoriaGnwsH and had been tagged as copyvio-suspicious nearly 1 year ago by another Greek user, who had provided the above cited deletion-rationale, which credits the map to Anastasios Karambabas. Your account-name is Anastasios Karababas, which is similar to the first one, but not identical. Anyway, in the web said book is credited to Anastasios Karababas. So, you could either upload the image by yourself or send a confirmation for the free license of the upload by IstoriaGnwsH to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). The latter is our dedault path for images uploaded by a user who is not the author. --Túrelio (talk) 17:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multipage files for transcription on wikisource

Hello Túrelio, before deleting or moving files used on an index page (like this action), please consider asking the uploader which file to keep. Index pages dont work with redirects. Regards --Mapmarks (talk) 18:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, shall File:Die Zurückkunft des Durchlauchtigsten Fürsten und Herrn Herr Friedrichs des Zweyten.pdf be restored? --Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I’m not sure if this would work. But instead if you have admin rights, please move the duplicate file to this name, as I suggested today. Thanks --Mapmarks (talk) 22:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg

Can you delete "Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg" as its bad duplicate? Thank you. --Nanafuji (talk) 11:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done already. --Túrelio (talk) 11:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't already deleted "File:Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg". Nanafuji (talk) 11:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the tagged redirect. The present file is not tagged as duplicate. --Túrelio (talk) 11:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since "File:Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg" is actually protected, can you tagged it as "duplicate"? Nanafuji (talk) 12:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "File:"Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg": "Exact or scaled-down duplicate (F8): File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg". Nanafuji (talk) 17:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hi, can you delete this image please: File:Lezmond-Mitchell.png

It is not the person in question, it is someone else called Tom Begaye, see these sources: [18], [19], [20]

Thanks Inexpiable (talk) 13:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Could you please delete my uploads from today? I wanted to upload 50 audios, but unfortunately, they got uploaded with wrong names. The upload wizard added a digit after the first item and then incrementally added to all following items. Once you've deleted these, I can reupload them with correct names. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 16:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 17:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sorry to bother you, I messed up again. Same problem, but this time I stopped the soon enough, so there are just a handful of files to delete. Could you remove the uploads from yesterday again? I will then reupload them one by one instead of using Wizard and trying to upload many files at the same time. That way I can make sure the naming isn't messed up. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 18:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for helping keep Wikimedia Commons "spam-free". You are one of the few admins I hugely admire. Please enjoy with this e-kitten.

─ The Aafī (^talk) 09:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hello, I want to report this file where is a picture of me with my name, surname and place where I am from. The picture was posted by my friend for a joke on the page about my place. Since some admin from Serbia deleted all nonsense he wrote on the page when I reported, I thought that was all, but today I saw my picture. I asked the same admin to delete the picture as well, but he told me to contact you because this is on Commons.I would really appreciate it if you could delete it, thanks a lot. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aleksa_Micic_The_Frog_of_the_village_Doljevac.jpg#filehistory 93.87.220.11 10:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hi. This image has been uploaded as being in the public domain but it is not: File:Kenneth Smith criminal.jpg

It is from the Alabama Department of Corrections. Please delete.

Thanks. Inexpiable (talk) 11:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hello sir! I would like to report this picture: File:Аслан Абакаров.jpg Ricco Baroni (talk) 07:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying. An admin-colleague has it already tagged. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Túrelio

Can you delete the https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Amrita-vishwa-vidyapeetham-logo.png&redirect=no redirect link as it is no-where used and replaced with right link 17289ha (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bugatti Type 101 s/n 101-501

Hallo Túrelio, Du hast Category:Bugatti Type 101 s/n 101-501 gelöscht. Category talk:Bugatti Type 101 s/n 101-501 existiert weiterhin. Aber bitte nicht einfach löschen!
Finoskov gefiel anscheinend der bisherige Kategoriename nicht. Damit habe ich kein Problem. Er legte eine neue Kategorie an, verschob den Inhalt dahin, und stellte dann den Löschantrag auf die bisherige Kategorie. Dadurch geht die Versionsgeschichte verloren. Und die Kategoriediskussion geht unter, wird vielleicht sogar gelöscht. Richtig wäre es meines Erachtens gewesen, Kategorie und Kategoriediskussion auf den neuen Namen zu verschieben.
Wünsche:

Category talk:Bugatti Type 101 s/n 101-501 verschieben nach Category talk:Bugatti Type 101 Gangloff cabriolet 1951 (chassis 101-501) Habe ich bewusst noch nicht selber gemacht.
Finoskov ansprechen, er möge in Zukunft solche Kategorien verschieben anstatt Neuanlage und Löschantrag. Gruß

Buch-t (talk) 08:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beides

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, vier Wochen später ist mir wieder so ein Fall aufgefallen, weil eines meiner hochgeladenen Bilder enthalten ist. Alt Category:Bugatti type 57 roadster "Grand Raid" by Gangloff (Louwman Museum) s/n 57-222, neu Category:Bugatti Type 57 "Grand Raid" roadster Gangloff 1934 (chassis 57-222). --Buch-t (talk) 09:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Buch-t,

hier ist es allerdings so, dass es die "alte" Kat. ausschließlich von Finoskov bearbeitet worden war und es keine Disku gab. --Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Es ist mir klar, dass es keine Diskussionsseite gab, die hätte untergehen können. Die Versionsgeschichte der Kategorienseite konnte ich nicht mehr einsehen. Ist denn der Weg, den Finoskov offensichtlich häufig wählt, regelkonform? Schließlich werden damit doch (zumindest seine) Beiträge bei der alten Kategorienseite vernichtet. --Buch-t (talk) 10:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nein (auf deine Frage). Ich hatte ihn ja letztes Mal auch darauf hingewiesen. --Túrelio (talk) 10:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, nächster Monat, die nächsten Fälle:

Category:Delage by de Villars. Diese Kategorie ist nicht ausschließlich von Finoskov bearbeitet worden.
Category:Delage Type D 8 Chapron coupe "Faux-Cabriolet" 1931
Category:Delage Type D8 S De Villars roadster 1933 (chassis 38012)

Bitte weise den Benutzer erneut auf seine Regelverstöße hin - in der Hoffnung, dass es diesmal hilft. Gruß --Buch-t (talk) 13:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noch mehr entdeckt:

Category:1908 Delage Biplace Course Type F in the Musée National de l'Automobile mit mehreren anderen Bearbeitern
Category:Delage Type CO (Autoworld Brussels) 1920
Category:Delage Type CO 4 ½ litre Salamanca mit mehreren anderen Bearbeitern.

--Buch-t (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, Du hast leider nicht geantwortet. Die Kategorien wurden gelöscht. Heute habe ich wieder 5 entdeckt (Bereich Talbot-Lago wie hier), weil ich davon eine selber angelegt hatte. Ich habe 5 mal Einspruch eingelegt. Du könntest mal reinschauen, wirst aber wegen der Vorgeschichte sicherlich nicht selber entscheiden. Gruß --Buch-t (talk) 08:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation: fake source

Is photos taken from Instagram considered as copyright violation: fake source ? You deleted a photo named File:Zehra Gunes.jpg. Please share your insight. I am new to Wikipedia editing stuffs. Thank you. ZachAlexanderCarter (talk) 08:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

the wording "fake source" was by the one who tagged the image as copyvio-suspected. Anyway, you gave "www.instagram.com" as source, which is useless, as 1) you did not provide the actual source-site, where the iamge is offered, and 2) material on Instagram is not free per se. --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

okay so images uploaded by a user on their own account is not free of copyright infrigment or any image from any social media shouldnt be uploaded here? ZachAlexanderCarter (talk) 10:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming that you are referring to Instagram: whether images, which a user has uploaded to his/her own Instagram or Facebook account are legitimate, we cannot really know. However, even if they are, putting them on said social media-accounts does NOT mean they are under a free license. Of course, you could try to contact the account-owner and ask them whether they are able and willing to release a specific image under a free license (such as CC-BY or CC-BY-SA). If they are, you could then upload said image to Commons, add {{Permission pending}} and then ask the owner to directly confirm the choosen free license for that image to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU SO MUCH ZachAlexanderCarter (talk) 10:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Крым

Приветствую! Восстановите, пожалуйста, все удалённые сегодня категории Крыма, которые участник расформировал без обсуждения. Речь идёт о категория типа Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Chornomorske Raion и прочих. Подробнее см Commons:Форум#Крым. Заранее спасибо. Mitte27 (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Коллега, там десятки удалённых категорий от участника, например ещё эти (но это явно не все). Category:Bus stops in Chornomorske Raion Category:Flora of Yevpatoria Municipality Category:Nature of Chornomorske Raion Category:Geography of Chornomorske Raion Category:Roads in Chornomorske Raion Category:Mosques in Saky Raion Category:Mosques in Chornomorske Raion Category:Economy of Saky Raion

Прошу отменить весь вклад участника начиная с 08:24, 1 февраля 2024, поскольку в ручном режиме мне на это потребуется не один день. --Mitte27 (talk) 00:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за восстановление категорий. Подскажите, как отменить все правки Ykvach начиная с 08:24, 1 февраля 2024? --Mitte27 (talk) 14:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think I have now restored all deleted cats since after January 25th. --Túrelio (talk) 16:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, но дело не только в удалённых категориях. Пользователь массово изменил всю категоризацю, включая файлы. Поэтому нужно отменить все его правки с указанной даты. Теперь чтобы отменить это нужно делать вручном режиме (например так), это займёт слишком много времени в таком темпе. Поэтому прошу отменить все правки участника с 08:24, 1 февраля 2024. --Mitte27 (talk) 18:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edit icon on Wikisite.svg

This image you deleted is actually a different color, this one is darker. 湯崩正海 (talk) 12:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 13:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed. Thank you. 湯崩正海 (talk) 03:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Карты были под свободной лицензией

Добрый вечер, прошу восстановить удаленные файлы загруженные мной, они были под свободной лицензией. Их в викискладе много https://acer120.livejournal.com/168185.html Il Nur (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you need to get more specific, what files are you talking of? --Túrelio (talk) 17:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you refering to File:Этническая карта Кайбицкого района.png? If yes, please correct the author-entry. --Túrelio (talk) 21:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Cliffs Utah Temple Air Balloon Festival inquisitivemuse.png

Hi Túrelio, you recently deleted three images that were uploaded from Instagram. These photos were used with permission from the creator- and the written permission was attached to the description of the file. Would you restore the files? I sent a message to Inquisitivemuse over Messenger, I said "I would love to use your image (of the temple) on the Wikipedia page, would you give me permission to upload it there? I will credit the photo to you!" Inquisitivemuse responded with: "Sure! Glad you liked it!" I asked if they wanted me to use just the username or full name, and if I could use other photos of the temple that were uploaded, and the response I got was: "My username is fine! And I wouldn't mind if you use any others." I can post a picture of the conversation here if it will help. Thanks for your consideration! Itsetsyoufree32 (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Itsetsyoufree32,

if you mean by "written permission" the above cited statement, sorry, that is not sufficient. 1) A permission "for Wikipedia" is generally not sufficient. Required is a release under a license, which is compliant to our policy COM:L. Recommended is the CC-BY-SA license ({{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}). 2) The copyright-holder needs to send his/her permission directly to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), from his/her official email address. --Túrelio (talk) 18:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images review

Hi, along my contributions there are plenty of screenshot uploads from YouTube with Creative Commons license. Could you please review the images as they haven't been yet since time ago. Majority of my uploads are also Public domain images, and not sure if they need approval as well.

Youtube

Public Domain

Regards Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 12:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've reviewed the Youtube-source image, which weren't already, and scanned through the "PD-tagged" images, which seem to be ok. --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. Thank you very much! :) Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting empty categories

Hi, you recently deleted Category:Files needing categorization by index as empty. However, a user had recently moved Category:Files needing categories by index to that title, leaving a redirect at the old title. As you might know, my bot moves pages out of redirected categories, but it has a 7-day cooldown period in case a move is reverted. If you delete the target category as empty within the 7-day period, the contents of the old category are stranded there and can't be moved to the new title. It would be appreciated if you would please refrain from deleting categories as empty if they have been created within the past seven (7) days. Thanks! --R'n'B (talk) 20:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can try. However, given the huge number of empty cats tagged for speedy and that I am not the only admin deleting cats, of course, it doesn't seem a reliable solution. Couldn't your bot put a warning-note/tag into the target-categories, when detecting a redirected category, even if it takes further 7 days until he fills it? --Túrelio (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will see. It's probably not too hard to do. --R'n'B (talk) 23:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted file

Hi, you deleted my file Bridge of Wisdom جسر الحكمة which was for the UAE in Lens Competition which was asking for pictures of Arab Books by emirati authors. Ziank-photography (talk) 05:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ziank-photography,

yes. The reason is that the image File:Bridge of Wisdom جسر الحكمة.jpg was considered to violate the copyright of the artist who created the artwork on the cover of this book. --Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but then what is the point of doing Arab books by emirati authors in a competition, when it will get copyrighted? Ziank-photography (talk) 09:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you need to ask that the people who opened said competition. I take care that all what is uploaded to Commons, is legitimate with regard to copyright. For details see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Book covers. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks anyways Ziank-photography (talk) 10:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way here’s the link to the competition, just in case Ziank-photography (talk) 10:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:시편촬요.pdf

File:시편촬요.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 13:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miklaszewski family

Hallo, du hast um 10:10, am 13. Feb. 2024 die Category:House of Miklashevskiy gelöscht und nach Miklaszewski family verschoben. Mit der Namensänderung bin ich teilweise einverstanden.

Ursprünglich kommt dieses Adelsgeschlecht aus Polen und dessen Name ist polnisch, daher hat die Schreibweise "Miklaszewski" irgendwo ja ihre Berechtigung. Allerdings beinhaltet die Kategorie (zumindest bisher) nur diejenigen Familienmitglieder, die im Russischen Kaiserreich zur Berühmtheit gelangt sind (z.B. sie waren Gouverneure oder andere hochrangige Beamte, Politiker, Großgrundbesitzer). Auf Russisch wurde deren Name "Миклашевский" geschrieben, was in die lateinische Schrift überführt als Miklashevskiy transliteriert werden kann.

Als der russische Adel nach der Revolution geflüchtet ist, haben sich viele Miklashevskys in Deutschland, Frankreich und den USA niedergelassen. Dort haben sie ihre Namen an die jeweils örtliche Schreibweise angepasst. In Deutschland und Frankreich haben sie die Schreibweise Miklachevsky benutzt und im englischsprachigen Raum Miklashevsky. (Quelle: Miklashevskaya, Ludmila. Gender and Survival in Soviet Russia. A Life in the Shadow of Stalin’s Terror. London, New York, Oxford, New Delhi, Sydney; first published in Great Britain,Bloomsbury Academic, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc,[2007, 2012].ISBN 978-1-3501-3921-3. p. xii.).

Es gibt auch zeitgenössische vorrevolutionäre deutschsprachige Quellen, die den Namen als Miklaschewski schreiben - z.B. Rigasches Adressbuch von 1910, S. 149 und Rigasches Adressbuch von 1911, S. 150.

Der Name heutiger Familienmitglieder wird amtlich als Miklashevsky von den russischen Passbehörden transliteriert. Einige Familienmitglieder leben in Deutschland und ihre Schreibweise ist genau diese (siehe z.B. hier).

Da bisher in der Commons-Category nur Familienmitglieder der russischen Linie der Familie enthalten sind, wäre die gegenwärtige russische Schreibweise für die Benennung sinnvoll - also Miklashevsky.

Gleichwohl arbeite ich seit Längerem an einigen Wikipedia-Artikeln zur Geschichte der Familie, die ich demnächst veröffentlichen werde, und darin werde ich auch auf die polnischen Ursprünge eingehen und einige polnische Familienmitglieder hervorheben und in die Commons-Category aufnehmen. Aus dieser Perspektive kann ich mit deiner Benennung der Kategorie mitgehen, denn in Kürze wird sie richtig werden. Dann (erst) wird die polnische Benennung stimmen.

So, nun abgesehen aber vom Namen, der Miklaszewski bleiben kann, finde ich, dass die Kategorie "House of..." heißen soll, statt "family". Es ist üblich, im Deutschen wie im Englischen, dass man von Adelsgeschlechtern bzw. -häusern spricht, und nicht von Familien. (siehe z.B. List of noble houses). Siehe auch andere Commons-Kategorien über Adel - Category:House of Hohenzollern, Category:House of Habsburg, Category:House of Windsor.

Ich habe deshalb versucht, die Kategorie nun nochmals zu verschieben als House of Miklaszewski, allerdings ist es mir nur halb geglückt. Ohne Administratorenrechte kann ich die darin enthaltenen Dateien und Unterkategorien nicht mitverschieben. Ich wäre dir dankbar, wenn du mir helfen würdest.

Vielen Dank. Liglioto (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Liglioto, Category:House of Miklashevskiy war heute von User:Heroldicas als Weiterleitung erstellt und sofort danach wieder zur Löschung beantragt worden, mit der Begründung, dass "Miklaszewski family" der korrekte Kategoriename sei. Diese erbeten Löschung hatte ich ausgeführt. Ich habe nun einmal in die Oberkategorie Category:Noble families of Poland geschaut; dort findet sich tatsächlich nur das Namensschema "Familienname family". Auch wenn ich deine obige Argumentation nachvollziehen kann, wäre es gut, wenn du die Angelegenheit zunächst zur Diskussion stellen oder zumindest mit User:Heroldicas diskutieren und einen Konsens erreichen würdest. --Túrelio (talk) 16:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Danke :) Liglioto (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate

Hello Túrelio. Is this video really a duplicate of the one it redirects to? When I uploaded it I was quite sure its quality was higher… Who tagged it as a duplicate? Cheers, RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also with this file. RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RodRabelo7,

both had been tagged by Kelly The Angel.

The 1st one: both versions report resolution 1.920 × 1.080, though your file was far biggger.

The 2nd one: both versions report resolution 1.920 × 1.080, though your file was somewhat biggger. --Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Upload new file with different format

Hello Túrelio, I just uploaded a logo [21] in jpg format instead of png, which I intended to do since I have it in png format with transparency and no background. However, upon attempting to upload it, I encountered an error stating, "File extension ".jpg" does not match the detected MIME type of the file (image/png)." What can be done in this scenario? Regards Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 09:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Throwawayjamal047,

indeed you cannot upload a jpg/jpeg-format file over ("new version") an existing png-format file, as they are different. You need to upload the jpg-file as a separate file (new upload). The filename can be identical, however, the extension needs to equate the file-format. --Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see, can you speedy delete this image anyways, as there is no need of it if there is another duplicate and same picture. Thank you very much Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 09:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, and you cannot upload en:File:Mehran FC logo.jpg to Commons, as it is fair-use, which is not allowed on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 09:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lycée Autogéré de Paris jean Lévi(2)

Bonjour, je suis Jacques Lévi, frère de Jean Lévi. Je galère pour inclure le texte "Jean Lévi un Pionnier pédagogique" . Une amie m'avait fait le travail en oct. 2023 je crois. Tellement heureux que ce renvoi jean levi '2) marche à nouveau, car il ne fonctionnait pas depuis sans doute longtemps. Bref, pourriez vous me dire la raison le cas échéant du retrait. Pour moi c'est important et mémoriel. Si il y avait un pb de photo, il s'agissait d'un portait de mon frère réalisé en famille par moi, Jacques Lévi. Je suis personnellement incapable de faire inclure ce texte ni la photo noir et blanc de Jean. S'il vous plait, Merci infiniment de me joindre jacqueslevi78@gmail.com si vous vouliez bien m'aider. Cordialement. Jeanlev78 (talk) 17:54, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Löschbefugnis

Guten Morgen Túrelio, wer kann auf Commons Dateien löschen, nur Admins oder auch Mitglieder des Support-Teams? Gisbert K (talk) 07:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moin Gisbert K,

innerhalb der Projekthierarchie m.W. nur Admins und Personen mit den darauf basierenden "höheren Weihen", d.h. Check-user, Bürokraten und Oversighter. Stewards natürlich auch, aber sie stehen ja ober/außerhalb der Projekthierarchie und spielen, als Amt, auf Commons eigentlich keine Rolle. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hello Túrelio, Can you delete these files with bad image quality for replacement with high quality version? Thank you. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]

[1] → (Can be replaced with this)
[2] → (Can be replaced with this)
[3] → (Can be replaced with this)
[4] → (Can be replaced with this)
[5] → (Can be replaced with this)
[6] → (Can be replaced with this)
[7] → (Can be replaced with this)
[8] → (Can be replaced with this)
[9] → (Can be replaced with this)
[10] → (Can be replaced with this)
[11] → (Can be replaced with this)
[12] → (Can be replaced with this)
[13] → (Can be replaced with this)

--Lee6597 (talk) 14:45, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please review these

Closed the dealt with part. (non-admin closure) ShaanSengupta^Talk 08:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello @Túrelio. You helped last time. I am here again with a request for you to kindly review some GODL-India images that I have uploaded or have worked on in past few days. Its presence in the given link needs to be confirmed. It will be of great help. Some of these are used widely by some of the most viewed pages on Wikipedia.

Although there are more files but I am stopping here bcoz the list gas already got too long. Also to ask Turelio can I get License Reviewer rights if not permanently then for sometime. I promise that I shall use it only to try to clear the backlog of GODL-India bcoz the list of unreviewed files under this license is very long. Even if I don't get the rights I will request to clear this much atleast. ShaanSengupta^Talk 16:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much @Túrelio. Adding just one more to the list for review File:The Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi in a Bilateral Meeting with the President of the United States of America, Mr. Joe Biden, at White House, in Washington DC, USA on September 24, 2021 (6).jpg. Also, Can we do something to clear the backlog. Because there are a lot of violations. Works by The Parliament are uploaded wrongly under GODL-India which is a violation. Both bcoz it doesn't come under it and also the website copyright policy states requirement of email permission. I have been nominating clear violations for SD, many of whom were deleted by you and others. But lately they are being converted to discussions bcoz of which I am loosing interest. I don't blame the process but clear violations need to be dealt immediately. ShaanSengupta^Talk 10:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Túrelio, I would request you to kindly delete previous version of File:Ruling Alliances in India.jpg which I uploaded. The file is my own work and previous versions have no relevance. And I also don't want it to be here. Especially the one which has black background on top and bottom of the main thing. I will be thamkful to you. ShaanSengupta^Talk 07:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio Thank you once again for acting on my request. I have got some more GODL-India files for you to review. These are last of the lot. Next one if required won't be before April.

Thanking you in advance. ShaanSengupta^Talk 15:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

<-- the source-site in the last file (and its cropped files) does not show the correct image, the deeplink does. --> Túrelio (talk) 20:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing and informing me. That was a misunderstanding of idv1 and idv2 by the original uploader. I have fixed it. ShaanSengupta^Talk 03:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Original upload deleted as duplicate of posterior upload

File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943 (52231775383).jpg was uploaded before File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943.jpg and yet the first one was the one that was deleted as duplicate? Please undelete the first file as it was the first to be uploaded and given that these are different versions. Tm (talk) 22:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tm, well, File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943 (52231775383).jpg was uploaded February 4th 2024, which is later than January 15 2024, when File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943.jpg was uploaded. In addition, the former file had been tagged {{SD|G7}} by uploader User:Le Petit Chat. The latter might have happened because he realized it was duplicate. IMO, at least in this case everything is fine. However, I will check each of the other files you have listed. --Túrelio (talk) 10:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer but sorry, for the confusion File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943 (52231775383).jpg it seems was indeed uploaded on February 4 as per the deletion logs and, according to what you said above by User:Le Petit Chat.

However, the file that might be the original upload in this case also deleted as an duplicate, i think if i am not mistaken is File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943. (52231775383).jpg (as per original flickr name, with a dot between 1943 and (52231775383). )I say this because i rarely chance the filenames of my uploads of this flickr account (except do to limitations on name lenght) and the source is named "SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943." with the dot.

Sorry again for the confusion, as i have no way of seeing who the uploaders of deleted files are but i think that File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943. (52231775383).jpg is indeed the original upload of August 3 2022. Thank you again for checking all out. Cheers. Tm (talk) 19:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same with File:SC 170023 - Moroccan cavalry in the streets in North Africa. 18 February, 1943 (52232247115).jpg, as both were uploaded in August 2 2022 and these new uploads in new filenames are from January 2024, as can be seen my posterior upload to this two images and anterior upload to this two images. Tm (talk) 22:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And the same can be said about your deletions of originals uploads of, as i always upload since 2022 all new files from the [https://www.flickr.com/people/signalcorpsarchive Signal Corps Archive flickr account almost as soon as they are available, sometimes only in a matter of few hours, so i know that all this files were the original uploads to Commons and those that have been redirected to are the real duplicates (aslso because they are the same exact resolution and differ only in very slight different exposures, crops, etc):

File:SC 170074 - Frederick O. Bird, director of the allied club in N. Africa is speaking to several Arabic Spahi troops (cavalry), who were inquiring concerning their friends. 20 February, 1943 (52233497374).jpg

File:SC 171567 - American soldiers teach French Army officers and man the use of American military equipment. A BD-72 Field Switchboard in operation near Algiers, North Africa. 9 February, 1943 (52271088907).jpg

File:SC 170379 - French Army officers and men take firing courses on American Military weapons, under American instruction. The firing of the Garand rifle in North Africa. 4 February, 1943 (52234478131).jpg

File:SC 179431 - General view of Goumiers, French Arab troops, with horses. Mistretta, Sicily. 30 July, 1943 (52516791200).jpg

File:SC 171568 - American soldiers teach the French the use of BD-72 common battery switchboard. In background an M1 Scout Car with transmitter. Near Algiers, North Africa. 9 February, 1943 (52271183337).jpg

File:SC 405104 - American and French troops presented arms before the ceremonies awarding the Legion of Merit at Place Foch. 12 October, 1943 (52134857086).jpg

File:SC 196160 - French troops of 3rd Inf. Div., 7th Alg., move through first town liberated in new French drive (51988083751).jpg

File:SC 411772 - M-4 medium tank passing through St. Pole to take part in the drive on Dadonville, 19 November 1944. (49539374892).jpg

File:SC 171566 - French officers operating SCR-284 radio with hand crank generator (52272056091).jpg

File:SC 170133 - A column of Moroccan Commando troops called "Goums" retreating from Sidi Bou Sid (52238007874).jpg

File:SC 170074 - Frederick O. Bird, director of the allied club in N. Africa is speaking to several Arabic Spahi troops (cavalry), who were inquiring concerning their friends. 20 February, 1943 (52233497374).jpg

File:SC 171563 - French soldiers shown operating radio in U.S. Army Scout Car, to show the French how to operate American Military Equipment. Near Algiers, North Africa. 9 February, 1943. (52273710726).jpg

File:SC 196123 - Maj. Gen. Walton H. Walker, Commanding general 20th Corps, 3rd Army, is presented with the French Fouragere (Fourragère) by Major Paul Aubrey, commanding officer of the regular French Army (52009840622).jpg

File:SC 196321 - French Commando fires 30 caliber machine-gun at German positions on the road to Belfort, as his compatriots watch. 20 November, 1944 (51977020786).jpg

File:SC 196670 - A Moroccan soldier waits in cover for an expected enemy counterattack, Mulhouse area, France. 22 November, 1944. (49547644262).jpg

File:SC 197061 - German prisoners captured in house to house fighting are rounded up by French soldiers on the outskirts of Belfort, France. 20 November, 1944. (49537558328).jpg

File:SC 171567 - American soldiers teach French Army officers and man the use of American military equipment. A BD-72 Field Switchboard in operation near Algiers, North Africa. 9 February, 1943 (52271088907).jpg

File:SC 184716 - Mules start up a steep trail at Pantano with supplies for the troops, of the 5th Rifle Regiment, 2nd Moroccan Division, (French), at the top of Mount Pantano (52273649537).jpg

File:SC 190576 - Shown here are American medics giving aid to a group of French soldiers... (49627515686).jpg

File:SC 196563 - Captain P. Hennick, and M. Jules Tonnelier, president of the Ancien Combattants, place a wreath on the monument erected to the heroes of World War I. Seventh Army. France. 12 November, 1944. (49538549121).jpg

File:SC 197062 - A tank crosses a treadway bridge near Belfort, France, as the French drive to take this German strong point. November 20, 1944. (49537491182).jpg

File:SC 329865 - Troops of the French 9th Colonial Inf. Div., boarding LCI in preparation for the invasion of Elba (52593787456).jpg, File:SC 329861 - Invading troops of the 5th Colonial Inf. Div. coming ashore at Marina Di Campo, Elba, under protection of smoke screen. 17 June, 1944 (52593611542).jpg

File:SC 196672 - A French Moroccan soldier, of the 1st French Army, covers a street in Mulhouse, France, as the fighting continues (49595538353).jpg

File:SC 196668 - A French tank machine-guns a German strong point on a street in Belfort, France. 22 November, 1944. (49540683392).jpg

File:SC 195531 - The first French regiment of Paris, France, recently organized and put in uniform, passes in review. 2 October, 1944 (52598107804).jpg

File:SC 193043 - A duplicator is used by these clerks of the 2nd French Armored Division at headquarters (53400217928).jpg

File:SC 193028-S - Members of a French Army Labor Battalion (Indo-Chinese), stand at the entrance to their encampment, awaiting orders from the Allies (53399856198).jpg

File:SC 171735 - Tunisian bystanders, at the historic occasion of the Allied entry into the captured seaport, applaud as motorcycle troops roll past. 1943 (52274659611).jpg

File:SC 171734 - A joyous father helped his small daughter onto a British armored car, while the young girl stood to salute Allied Armies as they entered Tunis, North Africa. 1943 (52279220794).jpg

File:SC 184718 - Two soldiers of the 5th Rifle Regiment, 2nd Moroccan Division (French) sit near their foxhole on the slopes of Mt. Pantano after they have helped to chase the enemy from the rest of the hill. 18 December, 1943 (52274087349).jpg

File:SC 192994-S - Parisians examine the tanks used by the French 2nd Armored Division and question the men about them and their entry into Paris. 25 August, 1944 (53402022460).jpg

File:SC 193076 - Pt. Phillipe De Gaulle, son of General De Gaulle and an officer of the 2nd French Armored Division, checks maps before going into action, somewhere in France. 16 August, 1944 (53403463574).jpg

File:SC 192995-S - Maquis who helped to liberate Paris silently watch while defeated Nazi soldiers are led along a Paris street to prison following their surrender. 25 August, 1944 (53400671512).jpg

File:SC 170028 - French soldiers in railway cars ready to leave Tebessa, North Africa. 18 February, 1943 (52233215193).jpg

File:Soldiers of the 5th Rifle Regiment, 2nd Moroccan Division (French), unload boxes of American "K" Rations from a pack train which hauls supplies partially up the slope of Mount Pantano for troops on the heights (52272343931).jpg

File:SC 170379 - French Army officers and men take firing courses on American Military weapons, under American instruction. The firing of the Garand rifle in North Africa. 4 February, 1943 (52234478131).jpg

File:SC 170075 - Interior of the American Red Cross Club in Oran, North Africa. 20 February, 1943 (52232234387).jpg

File:SC 170029 - French troops and equipment in railway cars ready to leave. 18 February, 1943 (52235401654).jpg

File:SC 184719 - A wounded soldier of the 5th Rifle Regiment, 2nd Moroccan Division (French), is being carried down the slopes of Mount Pantano to the town of Pantano where he can be evacuated for further treatment (52271398367).jpg

File:SC 193134 - French 2nd Armored Division passes through the streets of Meudon, just before entering Paris. A Renaut plant is in the background left. 25 August, 1944 (53408025010).jpg

File:SC 193027-S - French WACs attached to branches of the French Army, on beach at St. Tropez, southern France. 17 August, 1944 (53399936674).jpg

File:SC 193016-S - Still under enemy shell fire, tanks of the 2nd French Armored Division advance on the city of Anthony, France (53401469655).jpg

File:SC 171734 - A joyous father helped his small daughter onto a British armored car, while the young girl stood to salute Allied Armies as they entered Tunis, North Africa. 1943.jpg

File:SC 196667 - A group of German snipers, taken during the fight for a road leading out of Belfort, France, is led through the streets of the city by members of the 1st French Armored Division. 22 November, 1944. (49538485291).jpg

File:SC 170379 - French Army officers and men take firing courses on American Military weapons, under American instruction. The firing of the Garand rifle in North Africa. 4 February, 1943 (52234478131).jpg

File:SC 170104 - An Italian tank that was destroyed by the Allies in North Africa. 20 February, 1943 (52232368592).jpg

File:SC 170024 - Moroccan cavalry in the streets in North Africa. 18 February, 1943 (52231772551).jpg

File:SC 170095 - Italian tank destroyed by Allied gun. Kasserine Pass, Tunisia. 24 February, 1943 (52232369410).jpg

In summary around 50 images that were original uploads, but deleted as being duplicates of posterior uploads with the same source and resolution. And big waste of time to me that took the time to make this uploada and, besides other users, categorize them. So much time simply throw away into the deletion bin?

So, given that the error was of your doing, undelete the original ones and, if needed, delete the real duplicates. And i ask you how is this possible, as one or two is a comphreensible error but dozens of original images (many uploaded in 2021 or 2022) deleted as duplicates of posterior uploads (all made on January 2024) that are the real duplicates? Thanks. Tm (talk) 23:28, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression fichier Aile droite d'une statuette de Victoire, bronze, découverte rue Hoche, années 1960. Collections du Musée de Bretagne.jpg

Bonjour, vous avez supprimé le fichier Aile droite d'une statuette de Victoire, bronze, découverte rue Hoche, années 1960. Collections du Musée de Bretagne, sous prétexte qu'il n'était pas libre de droit. Il est pourtant sous la licence CC-BY, comme l'indique sa notice sur le site du musée de Bretagne. Pas la peine d'annuler votre suppression, j'ai refait un versement. Merci de mieux vous renseigner à l'avenir pour éviter les pertes de temps. CDT. Zélie.F (talk) 15:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Zélie.F: ,

let's stick to the available facts: the image was uploaded under the claim to be own work by the uploader.

Another user found it to be published in a scientific paper from 2021[22], published under a Commons-incompatible license (CC-BY-NC-ND). The image itself was credited to Musée de Bretagne. As there was no license-specification for this image, it is reasonable to transfer the paper's license also to this image. Therefore, the deletion was justified.

The link to http://www.collections.musee-bretagne.fr/ark:/83011/FLMjo222590 currently doesn't help, as the site is not available. This problem concerns also your upload File:Aile droite de statuette de Victoire.jpg.--Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just quick remarks:

The scientific paper license explicitly applies only to the text, not the images.
http://www.collections.musee-bretagne.fr/ is available but only from France, I improved the file and removed the {{LR}} templates.

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Túrelio (talk) 13:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

about homescreen removal from openharmony

hi, and thanks and for reading, I wanted to ask what was the problem in the file that was deleted about OpenHarmony HomeScreen? because it is an open source version and for free use,it was donated by Huawei to be freely usable as a part of its closed source operating system it is possible that it has been confused with HarmonyOS or HarmonyOS next? wiKipedia alerted me about the recent deletion of a similar file and that's why I didn't complete the upload an image file of OpenHarmony, could you help me to see the problem? Thx Ezequiel 449 (talk) 17:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ezequiel 449,

you are talking about File:HarmonyOS3HomeNew.jpg, right? Does it belong to en:OpenHarmony? If yes, the article states that is under the Appach license. So, the appropriate license-tag would be {{Apache}}. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

done, thanks for the help Ezequiel 449 (talk) 19:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of some images

Dear Túrelio, I would like to delete four images that I have uploaded. These are File:Membership of the Great Power System.png, File:Rekening Jan Perquin.png, File:Nonnenveld in 1907.png and File:Logo Korein.jpg. How can I get these removed? Can you possibly do this? Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 09:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning S. Perquin,

for the remaining one, you need to open a regular deletion-request, as it was uploaded quite some time ago and, IMO, has some value. --Túrelio (talk) 07:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Tordesillas is not copyright

Hello Túrelio, I just wanted to say if you did your research the article that I found it from it said "This photo has only identifying purpose: no copyright infringement intended. If you are the author or owner of the photo write us an email to info at filmaffinity.com or contact us on Twitter to accredit you" so it's not copyright until someone takes credit Pupusareawesome (talk) 22:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pupusareawesome, assuming you are talking about File:Jake Tordesillas.jpg. The above cited text is typical for images, that are used under the U.S. fair-use rules, i.e. that the user has no copyright and no specific permission. However, fair-use material is not allowed on Commons. It can be used and uploaded directly to :en-Wikipedia, but must be claimed as fair-use. --Túrelio (talk) 07:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Erklärung zu Löschung

Guten Tag Túrelio, ich würde mich sehr freuen, wenn du mir folgenden Sachverhalt erläutern könntest: Das Bild: File:Rogier van der Weyden The Altar of Our Lady Miraflores Altar Google Art Project.jpg wurde von dir gelöscht. (Siehe auch meine Disk-Seite). Ich möchte gerne verstehen, warum. Könntest du mir auch den Link zuschicken, vom Melder (Antragsteller) zur Löschung, den finde ich nirgendwo. LG Upti (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Upti,

die Datei war von User:Oursana, einem erfahrenen Benutzer, alc copyvio-suspect mit der Begründung "as non free frame still under copyright protection" markiert worden. Ich vermute, dass die zugrundeliegende Rationale ist, dass das Foto selbst nicht von dir stammte und deshalb {{PD-Art}} verwendet wurde. PD-Art darf aber nur für 2-dimensionale Bilder verwendet werden. Deshalb wird da üblicherweise der meist 3-dimensionale Rahmen weggeschnitten. Aber am besten fragst du Oursana selbst. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag Túrelio, vielen Dank für deine Antwort. Nur noch 2 Bitten: Sollte ich selbst einen Löschantrag stellen wollen (Grund: 3-dimensionaler Rahmen) wo müsste ich das tun? (Könntest du mir den Link zusenden, bitte) und Folgendes von mir hochgeladene Bild habe ich falsch benannt (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SDg_030_KKS2956.jpg), könntest du es löschen, ich lade es danach erneut (mit richtigem Namen) hoch. Im voraus vielen lieben Dank LG Upti (talk) 15:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moin Upti,

das 2. Bild habe ich gelöscht, wie erbeten. Worauf bezieht sich der zunächst genannte Löschantrag? Das "Rogier van der Weyden .."-Bild war ja schon gelöscht. --Túrelio (talk) 07:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag Túrelio, danke fürs löschen. Ich wollte nur wissen, wenn ich selbst einmal einen Löschantrag (Grund: 3-dimensionaler Rahmen) stellen wollte, wo müßte ich das tun? (Könntest du mir den Link hierfür zusenden) LG Upti (talk) 14:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Schau mal hier Category:Images with non-free frames, auf dieser Kategorieseite stehen die Dateien, bei denen der 3D-Rahmen um ein eigentlich gemeinfreies 2D-Bild entfernt werden müssen, samt einer Anleitung. --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deine "Expertenmeinung" bzgl. Umbenennung von Ortskategorien - jetzt Stadtteil und Flusskategorien mit Pfeil

Guten Tag Túrelio, ich habe mir in den letzten Tagen einige Kategorien auf einer Liste notiert, die chaotisch befüllt sind. Mache ich mir die Arbeit - dann könnte ich das auf einen aktuell gültigen Stand bringen, auch sollte es nicht zu neuen Komplikationen führen.

(1) Im Pool zur Flusskategorie <Tributaries of the Werra> tummeln sich inzwischen fast 50 Zuflüsse deren Schreibweise (Lemma) aber nur zum Teil mit dem zutreffenden Wikipedia-Artikel passen. Es finden sich auch einige Sonderfälle: Herpf (→Werra)‎ Das Pfeilsymbol ist ein Sonderzeichen und somit nicht mit gewöhnlichen Tastaturen schreibbar - Barrierefreiheit. Es ist aber bei kleinen Bächen, die nur in einer Gemeinde existieren, sinnvoll, denn viele Gewässernamen der Zuflüsse sind mehrfach in DACH zu finden. Ansonsten findet (river) - (Fluss) und (Werra) häufig Verwendung. Ich bitte um einen Tip, denn demnächst kann ich noch weitere 50 Bäche und Flüsschen per Karte beitragen.

(2) Die Gemeindefusionen der letzten 30 Jahre haben dazu geführt, das es in den Ortsteilnamen ziemlich viele "Abweichler" gibt. Ein größerer Stadtteil von Bad Liebenstein ist der Ort Steinbach (Wartburgkreis). Momentan mit etwa 100 Dateien befüllt. Sinnvoller wäre es, alle Subkategorien in <Steinbach (Bad Liebenstein)> umzubenennen. Aber in der Geschichte der Nachwendezeit war <Steinbach (Wartburgkreis)> ja auch mal existent . Was macht Sinn: eine Weiterleitung oder ein Erläuterungstext um diese aktuelle Situation zu verfestigen. Was meinst Du? beste Grüße EACC80 (talk) 11:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restore the file deleted under a possible copyright infringement

The file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Map_of_DSB_Campus,_Kumaun_University,_Nainital,_Uttarakhand.jpg This file is my creation in its entirety, it is not from a university brochure. The university was provided with this file by me for printing a physical map and bears my name as designer and creator. At least try to communicate beforehand. Harshit SR (talk) 07:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Restored. Other issue, did you personally colorize File:Polish victim of German Luftwaffe action 1939-colored.jpg? --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for restoring the file.

And as for the other file about polish victim of German Luftwaffe, yes, I colorized it manually on Adobe Photoshop. Harshit SR (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brooklyn Public Library Rugby Branch image

If I were to upload a new image under the same file name, would I be able to have that "old revision" image deleted, which is the common practice with fair use images on Wikipedia? or should have the current image deleted under a non-speedy proper process? Either way please let me know what is the best process to take. QuasyBoy (talk) 13:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

if the new image is similar to the old one, we could speedy the old version. It seems to have no current external uses. --Túrelio (talk) 14:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted it speedy deleted. I have a new recent photo version of the same location from a different angle. QuasyBoy (talk) 16:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, upload the "new version" over the old one File:Brooklyn Public Library Rugby Branch.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 17:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. I just uploaded the new image, what are the measures I need to do to delete the old image? QuasyBoy (talk) 18:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. QuasyBoy (talk) 16:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hakawi News

You rightfully copyvio-deleted some screenshots on Feb. 26 including this one. Because of a discussion at AN, I would like to know what date कटासमुला (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) uploaded that file. HouseOfChange (talk) 18:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per the log it was 04:00, 14. Feb. 2024. --Túrelio (talk) 07:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. So from timestamps it looks as if on February 14, कटासमुला started some publicity work with photos on mugs, but on February 17, two other editors created additional spam photos to upload for their project at Commons. HouseOfChange (talk) 17:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Updating File:Emblem of Vietnam.svg

Hi, I was wondering if you could update File:Emblem of Vietnam.svg. The file at File:Emblem of Vietnam (fixed).svg is a much more representation of the image. There's been an effort for several months to update the file but to no avail. Since the former can only be updated by administrators, I was wondering if you could update the file? Thank you. Colohisto (talk) 06:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've asked User talk:Fry1989 for comment, as he is experienced in flags and COAs, and had many edits in this file. --Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it looks like Fry1989 approved of the update to the file, could you update the file? For reference, the the request to update the protected image is on this page. Thank you. Colohisto (talk) 07:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the deletion request

Hi, I see that seven days have passed since the deletion request for the File:M01 (cropped).jpg. Can the discussion be closed? What will happen about the deletion? IM-yb (talk) 11:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem I see is that this image seems to be heavily used externally; see here. All sites hotlinking this image (which is not recommended), would loose it. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image is used by three low readability websites. Is this a reason for a potentially copyright violation image to remain on wikimedia commons? What will happen with the discussion? Will it stay open? Until when? What should be done to delete this particular image? IM-yb (talk) 22:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the policies listed:

A file or page can be listed for deletion on Commons:Deletion requests in the following cases:

The file/page has an unclear copyright status but the method described at Missing legal information cannot be used.

and

If the closing admin is unable to say with reasonable certainty that the file can validly be kept, it should be deleted in accordance with Commons' precautionary principle.

It is not the task of the closing admin to engage in detailed legal or factual research in order to find a rationale to keep the file. Under the rules of evidence we apply here, the burden of showing that the file can be validly hosted here lies with the uploader and anyone arguing that it should be kept.

Are these not enough? IM-yb (talk) 23:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite familiar with our policies. The issue is, that your copyvio-rationale is not very convincing IMO. Therefore, my assessment was based on a "uploader deletion request". --Túrelio (talk) 17:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deleting categories isn't helpful

deleting categories isn't helpful if you don't correct all links. Like here or here. Please try redirects. ...Sicherlich ^talk 19:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tut mir leid, dass du da nacharbeiten musstest. Ich bin davon ausgegangen, dass derjenige (nicht ich), der die Löschung der Kategorie angefordert hatte, eventuell nötige Umbenennungen selbst vorgenomemn hat. --Túrelio (talk) 21:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das nacharbeiten ist ja nicht das Problem; sondern die recht große Chance, dass man es halt nicht bemerkt. Ich wusste jetzt auch nur, dass es verlinkt ist weil ich es gerade erst getan habe und die Änderung bei meinen Bildern gesehen habe. Ohne redirect bleibt es sonst halt unentdeckt und der Lese steht doof da ...Sicherlich ^talk 22:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frage und Bitte

Guten Tag Túrelio,
ich habe 78 Dateien mit falschem Erscheinungsdatum versehen.
Frage: Hast Du ein Werkzeug, mit dem Du die Dateien (ohne zu großen Aufwand) verschieben oder umbenennen kannst??
Es handelt sich um die Dateien in dieser Kategorie:
Category:Orchids to move 4,
die anstelle der Jahreszahl (1923) am Ende der Datei die Jahreszahl (1925) haben sollten.
....es würde mir viel Zeit ersparen, die Dateien einzeln zu verschieben
Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 18:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, manuell; ich kenne kein Tool, das so eine selektive Änderung vornehmen könnte. --Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

…ich sage Dir ganz herzlichen Dank. Dass Du alles manuell bearbeiten musstest, hat mich nicht ganz zufrieden gestellt. Deine Zeit ist sehr wertvoll. Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 09:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:CH-NB-Ansichten Italien (Italy)

You deleted this category as being empty, it now is no longer empty & should be restored. Thanks. TheImaCow (talk) 23:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kalinga super cup

Logo useful for season page if can reupload Loptač01 (talk) 01:18, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking abaout? You have no deleted upload. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Alconi badge on Ren pageault 8

You seem too zealous with the copyright rules. This is a badge displayed and sold on all Renault Alconi model vehicles sold 1966, 67, 68 to distinguish from sister cars. It is same as Gordini sign or any other model! Its not a copy or patent unless used on a vehicle that is fake or copy! It should be undone. ~~~~ Aldercraft (talk) 03:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have no deleted upload with a filename that resembles anything of your headline. What file are you talking about? --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is on the wiki Renault 8 site.

curprev 11:43, 28 January 2024‎ CommonsDelinker talk contribs‎ 18,235 bytes −77‎ Removing Alconi_door_pillar_badge.jpg; it has been deleted from Commons by Túrelio because: Copyright violation; see c:Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-free logo above [[:c:Co undothank Aldercraft (talk) 04:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblem of Vietnam.svg

Hi, I just wanted to follow up on our previous conversation here. It looks like Fry1989 approves of updating the file using File:Emblem of Vietnam (fixed).svg from his talk page. I was wondering if you would be willing to update File:Emblem of Vietnam.svg by overwriting it with File:Emblem of Vietnam (fixed).svg and merging the two files? Thank you. Colohisto (talk) 15:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pectoral of Senusret III (2018).jpg

Dear Turelio,

Could you or another reviewer or Admin like Taivo please review this image please that I uploaded? I had to crop the photo so it will have to be reviewed by hand eventually anyway. I persuaded the flickr account owner to license the image freely. It is a very rare jewellry. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 12:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Museo Ottocento Bologna

Hello, Category:Museo Ottocento Bologna is the correct category, "Museo Ottocento Bologna" is the correct name of the museum, look at [23] [24]. Category:Museo dell'Ottocento (Bologna) is not, is just a descriptive category (The "Museo Ottocento Bologna" is a museums about art in the 19th. century, and it is a museum in Bologna.) Please restore the correct category of the museum. Pạtạfisik 18:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ping @Niketto sr.: --Pạtạfisik 18:25, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I've restored the category and accordingly corrected the WikiData-entry. --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barter System.png

First of all: Thank you very much for all your good work, for deleting (nearly) all the categories I nominate for deletion.
But now you deleted a file, where I have doubts about. This morning I added a question for Gnomingstuff about the deletion request for File:Barter System.png (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Barter_System.png). According to a notification email I received, (s)he answered my question, but I could not read it, because you have already deleted it. I figuered out that perhaps the file might not be copyright violation because at least one of the figures on it is in the public domain. Is there another explanation? JopkeB (talk) 16:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- apologies that you didn't get to see my response. The gist: The thing with tineye is that unless there is a very obvious source of an image (like a news story where the photographer is sourced to someone on staff), the earliest hit that is returned is not necessarily the original source, because of linkrot and the fact that stock images tend to often be used on sites that don't stick around. Even with stock images it is often unclear what the original source was, because these sites cannibalize one another all the time and not necessarily in ways that honor license. This is why I usually go off whether there are hits that predate the supposed creation date that the uploader said, as it all but proves that they just grabbed it off the internet.

With this particular user they seem to have uploaded a lot of diagrams with images of questionable provenance (and to be honest questionable quality) so it seemed to be a case where the precautionary principle would apply. Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@both, if you prefer to discuss it thorougly, I can undelete it and put it into a regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 19:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Gnomingstuff and Túrelio: for your reactions and answer. This is enough to convince me that this image should not be on Commons, too many doubts. So undeletion is not necessary. JopkeB (talk) 14:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Women of The Gambia by name

Es ist wohl keiner in der Lage die Vorlage für die Wikidata so zu ändern, dass sie keinen Blödsinn macht. Eine Idee war, wenn die Category:Women of The Gambia by name gar nicht existiert, das dann die Vorlage die Kategorien korrekt nach Category:Women of the Gambia by name einsortiert. Kann du das mal mit der Schnelllöschung überprüfen oder gar die Vorlage korrigieren? Danke Atamari (talk) 20:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe die Kategorie testweise mal gelöscht. Ich befürchte bloß, dass das nichts bringt, siehe Commons:Forum. --Rosenzweig τ 21:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ЛДК.jpg

Hello! This deletion reason doesn't seem valid: this website doesn't own the copyright of this 1912 photograph that is obviously under PD-RusEmpire. Or was it uploaded as Own work? Красный ^{wanna talk?} 10:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes, it was claimed as own work by Spacedog228. If you are sure it is in the PD, I can undelete it and put it into a regular DR to give time to gather the required information. --Túrelio (talk) 11:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sinnloses Löschen von Categorien im Wartburgkreis (WAK)

Hallo, in den letzten Tagen bin ich mehrfach auf gelöschte Kategorien - z.B. "Wood in Geisa, in Seebach (Wartburgkreis), ... gestoßen. Ergo irgendjemand arbeitet im Verborgenen und sabotiert die Arbeit. Es ist aber sinnlos, denn ich arbeite systematisch und zyklisch den ganzen WAK nach Themen. Damals waren es hölzerne Gebäude, jetzt hölzerne Skulpturen, in Kürze hölzerne Zäune, hölzerne Kreuze, hölzerne ... Daher meine Bitte - wenn Du auf eine scheinbar leere Kategorie zum Wartburgkreis triffst - ignoriere sie - ich werde die zeitnah weiter auffüllen, und auch die gelöschten Dateien werden sich "erneuern" - ich habe eine tägliche Protokollliste und werde an Hand der Orte herausfinden welche Datei dort entfernt oder gelöscht wurde und somit komme ich dem Saboteur auf die Spur und dann gibt's Ärger. EACC80 (talk) 13:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, werds versuchen. Wenn du mir eine konkrete dieser Kategorien benennen kannst, kann ich in der Versionsgeschichte nachschauen, wer sie markiert hatte. Vielleicht liegt ja ein Mißverständnis zugrunden. --Túrelio (talk) 13:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo - ich danke Dir für die rasche Reaktion. Ich habe vermehrt bei Wooden buildings in ORT - heuer wars bei Geisa und Empertshausen bemerkt. Irgendjemand macht mir das Leben schwer. Hölzerne Gebäude sind in jedem Ort und bei der Fülle an Bildern kann ich da auch massig liefern, aber jetzt will ich den Kategoriebaum möglichst rasch und komplex hochziehen, denn diese Arbeit vermeiden die meisten Kollegen. EACC80 (talk) 14:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiederherstellung

Guten Tag! Wäre es möglich, dass du die letzten vier (von mir erstellten) Kategorien zum Offenen Bundesmeile in Bern wieder herstellen könntest? Weil ich möchte in Kürze die Dateien hochladen! Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 11:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahmet Düz, erledigt. --Túrelio (talk) 16:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the categories fit well into the parent categories. Please delete the 3 subcategories and keep only the main one. Enhancing999 (talk) 16:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Danke dir! Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 18:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Question

Hi, I nominated a bunch of images (that aren't being used on any projects) for deletion. You said to start a DR. I'll be honest, my work here is very slim to nil (I'm mostly on en.Wiki). So could you point me in the direction of DR or tell me what I'm supposed to do? Thanks....NeutralHomer • Talk • 17:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, was offline a while. I see you have found already the way to start regular deletion-requests (DR). --Túrelio (talk) 21:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucas Bravo.png

Hey, Could you please review this one for me?:) ArturSik (talk) 20:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removed IShowSpeed image.

Hello.

You removed the image from the IShowSpeed page allegedly for copyright. please check the copyright and information on the picture before removing it. all the information is correct. MrRapide (talk) 09:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

in case you are refering to File:Ishowspeed in 2023.jpg , "source=www.youtube.com" is not a proper source-entry. You need to link to the specific page with the video, from which the screenshot/frame was taken. --Túrelio (talk) 18:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About File:Ohno.H.jpg

Hello Túrelio.

I wanted to ask you why you deleted File:Ohno.H.jpg since it's my own work. I don't have that much of knowlege of Wikimedia Commons so teach me if something wen't wrong. KBO36 (talk) 06:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KBO36,

it had been tagged as copyvio-suspect by another user and was indeed found published elsewhere. If you would like to discuss it, I can temp-undelete it and put it into a regular DR.--Túrelio (talk) 06:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This homepage is my own page, so I own the copyright.

Wouldn't it be a problem if I included more detailed information in the upload file name　or is there another way. KBO36 (talk) 06:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was doing some research and came across a misunderstanding.

Thank you for your cooperation. KBO36 (talk) 07:45, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've undeleted the file, removed the speedy-tag and put it into a regular DR, wqhich allows a discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Display issues

Hello Turélio!

Since you have fixed the issues with File:Fabulas (9ª edição).pdf, could you also do the same with File:O Ganso das Neves.pdf? Both cases have been edited with ilovepdf.com, but I don't know why this glitch happens... Thanks, Erick Soares3 (talk) 12:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! But the File:Fabulas (9ª edição).pdf glitched again - but I hope that it is some issue with Commons itself. For much, the worst part is that the pages at the Portuguese Wikisource still have the glitch even after the PDF was fixed... Erick Soares3 (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No idea how this can happen. One thing you might try: upload the last image-version under a filename without "special" characters, such as ª ç ã, just as a test. --Túrelio (talk) 06:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Helmut Sinzinger

Hallo Turelio, ich nehme an dass der User:Helmut Sinzinger und jener in der Category:Helmut Sinzinger ident sind, was aber bedeutet, dass dieser am 21. Februar 2020 gestorben ist -- da sollte man seine Seiten vermerken, bzw. sperren. lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 10:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Done. Danke für den Hinweis. --Túrelio (talk) 12:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake

Hello, I requested deletion of a category, and you deleted it. I now know that I was wrong. The category in question is Category:Photographs by Eric Vance. I think I should recreate the deleted category and move the images back. Is that O.K. with you? Krok6kola (talk) 21:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photographer in question is Vance, Eric, EPA chief photographer. Although he is an EPA photographer, he is not a DOCUMERICA photograph. I'm very sorry for my mistake. Krok6kola (talk) 21:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and recreated it as someone pointed out that I was wrong. I was afraid I would forget if I did not do it now. I made a redirect. If you do not agree, let me know and I will fix it the way you want. So sorry for all this. Krok6kola (talk) 00:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove misleading lines at the bottom of this article

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Young_Christian_Lady_Photographer_Drowns.jpg

Here are the lines that need to be removed:

File usage on Commons The following page uses this file:

File:HEADLINE - "LEEDS LADY DROWNED OFF FILEY BRIGG - Photographing the Breakers" (Yorkshire post April 18, 1900).jpg (file redirect)

Thanks 175.38.37.197 07:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube upload

Hi, could you check this (Manastarsyoutubeurl (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user) user's upload? It seems to me copyvio? If so, please take appropriate action. Thanks. ~AntanO4task (talk) 16:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, note that the user name represent the YouTube channel. --~AntanO4task (talk) 16:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a copyvio . You can check the channel by clicking the link at the image . Manastarsyoutubeurl (talk) 16:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 20:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Serpulo Planet - Mindustry.jpg

This file which was deleted is a screenshot from a videogame under liscence GPL-3, which means the file I had published hadn't violated the copyright.https://github.com/Anuken/Mindustry

Please bring it back. Arkyid (talk) 21:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done already. --Túrelio (talk) 06:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Spanish Borderlands (1921)

Hello Túrelio, there is the 1921 book by various authors and the The Spanish borderlands; a chronicle of old Florida and the Southwest (1921) by Herbert Eugene Bolton and there are the Spanish Borderlands. Since you deleted the category previously, I would appreciate if you took another look at it and let me know your thougths. Thank you so much for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lotje,

when I delete categories it is just for maintenance and usually only after being requested by other users. So, I am not really "involved" with that. That said, when thinking about whether a specific category is appropriate or not, usually I first look which kind of categories do exist already and then look at the category-level below the intended new category. In your case that would be Category:The Spanish Borderlands. If you judge that it is too crowed and/or too unspecific, just recreate the formerly deleted category. I leave that to your judgement. --Túrelio (talk) 12:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:William-wallace.jpg

Hi, IMHO, replacing an invalid license with {{Wrong license}} doesn't help. The file just ends up in Category:Media without a license: needs history check with more work to do. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are correct. Probably I was in a hurry at that moment. --Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Elena (ship, 2012, Istanbul)

I'm not sure why this category was deemed "unuseful". It's always possible for ship pictures to be uploaded in the future. In any event, it looks like there are at least four images (File:Navire ELENA au port de Casablanca.jpg, File:Navire ELENA à quai.jpg, File:Navire ELENA à Casablanca.jpg, and File:Navire ELENA au port.jpg) which should have been in that category, but are currently miscategorized in a different ship (of the same name and build year). Could that be undeleted? Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clindberg,

the cat was empty and had been tagged by another user for speedy deletion. The term "unuseful" is the default-wording of CSD C2 and added automatically by the script. Undeleted now. --Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A while back there was a policy change that simply empty was not grounds for speedy deletion -- just obviously unuseful ones, without future prospects. Anyways, thank you :-) Carl Lindberg (talk) 09:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalisme sournois / Sneaky vandalism

Cher Túrelio, je découvre aujourd'hui ce vandalisme sournois d’un contributeur habituel de Commons MB-one. Cette avocate des Droit de l'Homme est mal vue par l’extrême droite. Je pense que, même tardivement, il est nécessaire de sanctionner ce comportement pour le principe. Un contributeur habituel de Commons ne devrait jamais faire de tels actes de vandalisme. Avec mes remerciements,

Dear Túrelio, today I discovered this sneaky vandalism from a regular Commons contributor MB-one. This human rights lawyer is frowned upon by the far right. I think that, even belatedly, it is necessary to sanction this behavior in principle. A regular Commons contributor should never engage in such acts of vandalism. With thanks, Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 10:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT : I find out that this user is an administrator. An exemplary sanction must be taken.--Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 10:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Claude Truong-Ngoc,

while I don't know MB-one personally, I assume that this was an unintended, though very unfortunate misclick, as it happens also to me sometimes, though I would have corrected myself immediately. Anyway, as my colleague Yann had asked him already on his talkpage 2 days ago, I've contacted him directly and asked him to clarify this issue. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ctruongngoc, as I see now, it had already been clarified. --Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup ! --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 14:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:أبو بيان.jpg

Yours sincerely, Omphalographer (talk) 22:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete

Category:Ligature "TU"

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FAB-500 with gliding system.jpg

Hello Turelio! In March you have rightfully deleted a stolen picture. However yesterday I contacted the original poster of this picture on the Internet, Fighterbomber, and asked to release this picture under CC Attribution 4.0, to which he agreed. (Its an account which is mentioned in the description of Fighterbomber channel as the one to contact) Can you please restore the image? You can contact me for more info if You want. F.Alexsandr (talk) 15:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi F.Alexsandr,

I have temp-restored the file. However, you need to correct to source- and author-entry, provided Telegram-user Fighterbomber said that he is the photographer. In addition, as I can't speak/read Russian and therefore can't verify the above linked statement by Fighterbomber, I will try to involve a Ru-speaking colleague to take care of that. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, i have edited the description. F.Alexsandr (talk) 16:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Chrome OS 69.png

Thanks for handling the speedy deletion of this copyright violation image! There are a few more similar case images of Google ChromeOS and Google Chrome that are also falsely claimed to be the user's own work, uploaded under a free licence in violation of the copyright holder's licence (in both cases Google's Terms of Service, as linked in the deletion) and which actually show the copyrighted portions of the ChromeOS or Chrome user interface. In the past I have had other admins not understand this particular copyright violation situation and decline the speedy deletion. I was wondering if I nominated some more files in the same situation, would you would be willing to assess them also for deletion? If so, I could nominate them and list them here for you to consider each case. - Ahunt (talk) 12:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gerrit van Honthorst - Christ Crowned with Thorns - 90.PA.26 - J. Paul Getty Museum.jpg not exact duplicate

Hi, you deleted File:Gerrit van Honthorst - Christ Crowned with Thorns - 90.PA.26 - J. Paul Getty Museum.jpg ( 3,285 × 4,250 / 19,375,850 bytes) for File:Gerrit van Honthorst (Dutch - Christ Crowned with Thorns - Google Art Project.jpg ( 3,286 × 4,251 / 3.03 MB). The file is much larger and the colors are different. It's not an exact duplicate at all! Please undelete and restore usage. Google probably "improved" the original image. I recall some very angry people from a big museum photo studio where this happened. Multichill (talk) 18:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Downtown+Gilbert-2.jpg

Hi, I created a regular DR just before you deleted it. None of the link is the source of this image. Yann (talk) 10:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hispano-Suiza K6 Saoutchik

Hallo Túrelio, schon wieder die nächsten regelwidrigen Neuanlagen statt Verschiebungen samt Schnelllöschungen von Kategorien, die Beiträge anderer Benutzer enthalten. Dir melde ich: Alt Category:Hispano-Suiza K6 Saoutchik, neu Category:Hispano-Suiza K6 by Saoutchik, weil Du gelöscht hast. (Einen anderen Fall melde ich Yann, weil er gelöscht hat.) Wie kannst Du das bereinigen? Vielleicht Category:Hispano-Suiza K6 by Saoutchik löschen, Category:Hispano-Suiza K6 Saoutchik wiederherstellen und verschieben?
Siehe auch #Category:Bugatti Type 101 s/n 101-501. --Buch-t (talk) 15:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hispano-Suiza I 6

Hallo Túrelio, Du hast diese Kategorie gelöscht, nachdem Finoskov für Fotos von einem der erhaltenen Fahrzeuge die separate Unterkategorie Category:Hispano-Suiza I 6 Vanvooren Pillarless berline 1924 (chassis 20-001) angelegt hatte. Die wird aber als Hauptkategorie gebraucht, in die alle vorhandenen und zukünftigen Unterkategorien zu den verschiedenen Fahrzeugen des Typs I 6 einsortiert werden. Also bitte wieder herstellen. --Buch-t (talk) 15:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redo your image file deletion

Hello, I see you delete my Lego truck photo. I owned this image, since now if you check in the other wiki, it’s gone, meaning that’s proof I didn’t copying it and it’s my work. If you can redo it, please do. If not, please try to otherwise I’ll contact other administrations to block you for your inappropriate act. Thank you, MinecraftPlayer321 (talk) 20:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should not threaten other users, whether admin or not. Image now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lego Bricks Truck.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

video game cover

Hello, I misstake the license of Nier Replicant cover art, how can use the Non-free video game cover license? sorry for misstake 千尋0096 (talk) 14:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, fair-use material is generally not allowed on Commons. Some projects, such as :en, have an exemption-policy for such material. So, you need to check whether your project has one, and then upload it locally. --Túrelio (talk) 14:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Videogame covers, such as Nier Automata, is permited, but i dont know how it works, sorry. 千尋0096 (talk) 14:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Album covers, which is applicable to other kind of covers. If it's above threshold of originality, it's copyrighted and you need a permission from the author/artist/rights-holder. --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Äntligen maj: Wiki Loves Earth 2024!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Utöver bästa foto belönar vi även fotograferande av tidigare ofotograferade objekt samt bästa bildserie om minst tio fotografier av samma objekt. Tävlingen börjar 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Expeditioner, fotosafari eller en helt vanlig promenad? Via en smidig karta som visar ditt närområde hittar du bra ställen att besöka – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! / Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request of a deleted image to be put back on

Hello, I've noticed you removed an image I uploaded. As I stated I've obtained this image from the social media account of Jo_the_femboy, and I've got his permission to upload it here. What can I do to get the image back up here? Do I have to provide proof?

Thanks! Elagabalus83 (talk) 17:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

such statements are considered insufficient. The copyright-holder needs to confirm the choosen free license directly (no forwarding) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). The permission needs to specify the image (URL/filename on Commons) and the license. To be sure, use this template: Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file, fill-in the variables, mail it to the rights-holder and ask him, if he is willing, to sign and date it and to send it to the specified address. --Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shocking !

Hello. I'm shocked to see that you deleted File:Syed Imtiazuddin.jpg, the image of my late father who was a prolific orator, writer, columnist, books compiler, poet, philanthropist, activist and engineer. I have myself provided many of his images to media outlets. With his knowledge and approval I've uploaded many celeb autographs on commons. So there's no copyvio even if any pic is published elsewhere. Here is an English writeup on him, if you would like to read.

Also carefully examine File:Smiling baby boy with white-dotted red hat.jpg, childhood pic of my son's childhood bestie. If it's from another file, where's the file and how is this copyvio? Plz restore both files.--Muzammil (talk) 07:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @User:Hindustanilanguage,

there is no reason to be "shocked" about a deletion on Commons, as you should well know as a long-term user.

Anyway, wrt File:Syed Imtiazuddin.jpg: it is obviously a reproduction from print and the given date (2023) is hardly the date of the original shot. So, what needs to be answered is: 1) who created the original photography (not the reproduction), and 2) when was it really shot?

The same questions wrt File:Smiling baby boy with white-dotted red hat.jpg, original photographer? and original shot-date (year)? In addition, you as the father might ask yourself whether it's prudent to publish a personal image of a family member (privacy, consent). --Túrelio (talk) 10:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I think a replacement pic now suffices pic deficiency of the article for which it was intended. While guy in the other pic uploaded tons of his pics on Snapchat, no issues of privacy are breached in posting a pic I took personally. And this chap is not my son but his best friend (freund) as already stated. Anyway, I withdraw my request to undelete. Muzammil (talk) 18:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request

An image uploaded of streamer Adin Ross in 2024 was deleted by you. I am looking to get it restored as it was correctly licensed but looked as so as it wasn't when you viewed it.

I uploaded a review in Commons:Undeletion requests as I wasn't sure what steps to do first but after looking around I was suppose to reach out via talk page first.

Here's what was said in my request.

When this file was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, it was available from YouTube under the stated license of "Creative Commons Attribution license". Since then the YouTube channel changed the license but Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable in this manner. https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&oldid=4299#What_if_I_change_my_mind.3F

The exact time the file was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons shows the video was under the Creative Commons Attribution license : https://web.archive.org/web/20240501055624/https://youtube.com/watch?v=UDM9p8kBIWI

Current YouTube video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UDM9p8kBIWI&t=1256s

Cxhd (talk) 12:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nicholas Galitzine, 2024.jpg

Hi ya, could you please review this one? Many thanks:) ArturSik (talk) 13:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Providing requested screenshot.

Hi.

I tried to upload a picture, but got deleted with this comment as a explanation:

14:07, 21 March 2024 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page File:14 Heimer og folk i Stiklestad-s328.jpg (Copyright violation: Print screen from a digitalized version of a book, on the Norwegian National Library. (Source URL is possibly limited to Norwegian IP adresses, contact me for a screenshot of the entire page, proving the copyvio.) https://www.nb.no/items/7eca901565dedcb987ce7592a0c178e5?page=327) (thank) (global usage; delinker log)

I dont know how I can send you a screenshot, but the page where the map is located are on page 327 on this book "Bind, Heimer og folk i Stiklestad, av Ottar Moholt og Solveig Ness, Bygdeboknemnda 2005" found under "Fullversjon" in this link [25]https://www.verdalsboka.no/nedlasting/

If needed I have contacts with the author of the book. He say that the map is free to use, but do we need to proof this? Thanks. Pederw95 (talk) 09:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lithografiestein zum Titelblatt von David Poppers Spanische Tänze

Hallo, Túrelio. Vielen Dank, dass Du das nebenstehende Fotos des Lithographiesteins elektronisch entspiegelt hast. elektronisch gedreht hast. Es wird dadurch für Anna Normalverbraucherin lesbar. Zur Visualisierung der Arbeit des Lithographen benötigen wir jedoch insbesondere das Original, die Ursprungsversion, um sichtbar zu machen, dass die ausführenden Künstler und Lithographen spiegelverkehrt lesen, schreiben und gravieren können mussten. Darf ich Dich bitten, neben Deiner entspiegelten Version (Danke!) auch das Original wieder sichtbar zu machen? Dank für die gemeinschaftliche Arbeit sendet Dir Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 11:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Bernd,

ich habe die Datei einfach auf die Originalfassung zurückgesetzt, in der Annahme, dass das deinem Wunsch entspricht. Außerdem habe ich in der Beschreibung als zusätzlichen Eintrag |Other_versions= eingefügt, mit einem Link auf die oben von dir verlinkte gespiegelte Fassung. Den Eintrag kannst du aber wieder entfernen falls das nicht deiner Systematik entspricht. --Túrelio (talk) 12:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any sanctions of wikimedia of me?

even if unknowingly, seeing a mistake. Will there any sanctions? absolutely i not abuse using Trbatuhankara (talk) 10:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you asking? At least for Commons, I am not aware of any "sanctions". It seems you uploaded some images, which were found to be unfree. You then discussed it with a patroler. We assume you uploaded these images in error or without knowing they are still copyrighted. So far, this would not merit any sanction. However, for future uploads, if they are not your own work, first try to check or ask experienced users whether the upload would be ok. --Túrelio (talk) 10:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am new for wikimedia and learning this. thanks for answer. trying be careful Trbatuhankara (talk) 11:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Ugo Biggeri

I apologize, but the license for this photo is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED, as indicated at the bottom of the page https://valori.it/numeri-crescita-banca-etica/. If I'm not mistaken, this should allow for its use, correct? Thank you Homeless (talk) 18:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I had written already in the note on your talkpage, NC (= no commercial use) is a restriction, which is not accepted on Commons and Wikipedia, see COM:L. --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image of mine you deleted

I recently uploaded a work by Adrian Nichols of a photo of the Eurotunnel Class 0031. You deleted it under the pretext of free use files not being allowed on Wikipedia, but I was given permission to upload the file by Adrian himself. Surely, if the original uploader gave me permission, uploading shouldn't be a problem, no?

-WaterDuck WaterDuck8 5741 (talk) 02:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, assuming you are referring to File:Eurotunnel Class 0031 No. 0035.jpg: you did not provide the source; writing "Flickr" is useless, as nobody can evaluate the source with this information. Another editor took the pain to search for the image on Flickr and found it at https://www.flickr.com/photos/36034969@N08/14328654844 and with "All rights reserved". So, where is said permission now? Thereafter, an IP (likely you) changed the alleged CC-Zero to "fair use". However, fair-use material is not allowed on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 10:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The permission was located in the comments, I'd asked for permission to upload it and he said yes, so long as I credited him as the author, which I did.

h

https://www.flickr.com/photos/36034969@N08/14328654844/#comment72157720355710094 WaterDuck8 5741 (talk) 12:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's something. But, it's not sufficient, as "permission for use in Wikipedia" is not an accepted substitute for a free license. Per our policy COM:L, uploads to Commons need to be freely usable, even for commercial purposes and for derivatives. Recommended licenses, which allow these uses, are CC-BY and CC-BY-SA for example. So, you might contact the Flickr-photographer again (best on a private channel, if available) and ask him if he would be willing to do this. If he agrees, but wants to have the image on Flickr still under "all rights reserved", there are 2 ways to do this. 1) He could change the license on Flickr for at least 1 hour at a prespecified point of time to CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. Our Flickr-Review-bot could then read the license from his Flickr-site and record it here on Commons. Thereafter he could change the license on Flickr back to ARR. However, this would make it necessary that he tell us/you at what time he would do this, as we then would need to "activate" said bot. 2) The other way would be that he sends to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org an email from his Flickr-account stating that he releases said image under the CC-BY or CC-BY-SA license. --Túrelio (talk) 15:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CHE Céligny COA var.svg

Hi, can you please restore this file? It's not a duplicate, it's meant to be a variation of File:CHE Céligny COA.svg using a different palette. There's been numerous overwrites so I don't know in what state the file was when it was deleted but it's meant to be this version: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/7/7b/20240519165059%21CHE_Céligny_COA.svg. Thanks in advance. - Espandero (talk) 17:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. But you were the one who tagged it for deletion per "{{SD|Variation of [[:File:CHE Céligny COA.svg|CHE Céligny COA.svg]], not usefull.}}". --Túrelio (talk) 16:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't remember asking for the deletion but given what's going on the other file it's best we keep both. Sorry for the confusion. - Espandero (talk) 17:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please stop deleting (flag) redirects

Hi. Please stop deleting the (flag) redirects, they exist for a good reason, and the redirects are within policy. That we have a user who now thinks it is a good idea to nominate them is the problem, and that is exacerbated when you actually do them. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. --Túrelio (talk) 07:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2

Please delete the Files. The first one is misattributed. The second one is an unsuccessfully uploaded copy Воскресенский Петр (talk) 20:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How are you finding duplicates so quickly?

Hi, Túrelio. Thank you for deleting my upload that was a duplicate. Flickr2commons used to check for duplicates, but that does not appear to work any more. How did you find the duplicate so quickly? Is there a duplicate-finding tool that I don't know about? That would be very useful! Thanks for any information. — hike395 (talk) 16:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hike395, this would be a perfect template to tell a magical ability of admins. ;-) But, no. It wasn't even me who detected the duplicate. It was the work of the bot User:OptimusPrimeBot. It detects and then tags such files. Only then comes an admin and likely deletes the file. As I don't mass-upload from Flickr, I am not aware of a currently working tool/bot that warns of duplicate at the time of upload to Commons. However, you might ask at COM:VP. --Túrelio (talk) 17:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just found that Flickypedia checks for duplicates (I just tested it), so I'll use that from now on. Thanks for your help! — hike395 (talk) 17:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To answer the "how": my bot parses Special:ListDuplicatedFiles every 15 minutes (but the page itself is updated only every three days). If there is less than 200 files in Category:Duplicate, it fills the category up to 200 files with the more recent files listed on Special:ListDuplicatedFiles. The code is here. vip (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Transjakarta BRT Route 6B Icon.png

Hello!

Something weird happened here. The redirect target redirects back to the original. Jonteemil (talk) 10:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same with File:Transjakarta BRT Route 9C Icon.png. Jonteemil (talk) 10:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No idea what happened here. Anyway, I've reverted myself in File:Transjakarta BRT Route 9C Icon.png and File:Transjakarta BRT Route 6B Icon.png has already been corrected by a colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 10:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please take a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mr Ghulam Asghar.JPG

The file is unused and is likely covered under pictures of non-contributors, and a speedy delete candidate. I guess I just feel a frisson of annoyance at an uploader treating us as his personal filing system. I think I am correct in my assertion there, and I "just don't want to accede to his request" 😈. However I feel it is probably right to do so. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 08:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for my late reply. I felt the same way. In between, it has been deleted by a colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 14:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File License Review

Hi! Hope you are doing well1 Please review lincese of File:Mansoor Ali Shah.png. ThanK You :) Wallu2 (talk) 14:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wallu2 I notice this and added the licence found at the source to the file description: Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed) 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 14:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I reviewed it now. --Túrelio (talk) 14:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before I make a fool of myself(!)

Please look at File:Harihar Singh Mardaraj Bhramarabara Roy.jpg, which appears to me to have the characteristics of a copyvio (source). I cannot find a thing at the declared source site to verify permission here, However, does the Odisha Assembly source grant it the automatic ability for editors to upload it here? 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:09, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, while you are correct wrt the evidence, the website, where this image is said to be taken from (though I couldn't really find it), states indeed[26] "The content of this webpage is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License". As the depicted is dead since 1994 and due to the low quality, it's unlikely that an assumed copyright-holder would file claims in the case odishaassembly.nic.in's claim is bogus. --Túrelio (talk) 10:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PTT login screen.png

Sorry to bother you. I checked the website's licence and the correct permission should be GPL. Can you undelete it? Rinna (Talk) 10:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I went to https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/ID_Getback/M.1603329678.A.726.html , but did not see any license/permission statement. --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That page is for people who forgot their password. Please see https://www.ptt.cc/index.source.html, the login screen is a part of ptt's source code and it's under GPL (https://github.com/ptt/pttbbs), just like File:Pttlogin.png. Rinna (Talk) 11:12, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I've restored it, but you need to add the correct license-template, not CC-0. --Túrelio (talk) 12:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack by user

A user made personal attack 3 times and claims that "he doesn't care" [27] [28] [29]. Boneless Pizza! (talk) 12:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User blocked for 3 days. However, you should also not troll them [30],[31]. --Túrelio (talk) 12:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They're the one who started, thou I would take that advice. Boneless Pizza! (talk) 12:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right to delete duplicates

Hi,

Is it possible to acquire the necessary rights to replace duplicate files as you have done here with the maps of municipalities in Akershus (your work here)? I am considering restarting my work with maps, and have many older files I want to replace. Worldlydev (talk) 14:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have plenty of uploads to the Commons and have made quite a few contributions as well. Uploads: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles?limit=500&user=Worldlydev Worldlydev (talk) 14:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. I see that I would need administrator rights for this. Please let me know if there is another way. This is really the only tool I am interested in. Thanks for your time. Worldlydev (talk) 20:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Worldlydev, sorry for my late reply. Indeed, processing duplicates requires admin-rights, as a file is deleted. However, every user can nominate duplicates, ideally using the template {{duplicate|<targetfile>}}, which needs to be placed onto the to-be-deleted/replaced file. This template is linked to a script, which replaces the uses of the to-be-deleted file on all Wikimedia projects by the "target-file". Duplicate-nominations are usually processed within a day, as they are speedy-request. --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Query from CSM269

Hi, I saw some users were trying to upload contents (mainly photographs) of members of Lok Sabha, but were deleted due to copyright infringement. If I get a consent from the Lok Sabha secretariat for the permission to upload, can I upload it? If so, how will I start the process with? Regards, CSMention269 (talk) 15:31, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes to your 1st question. One important caveat: content uploaded to Commons needs to be under a free license, per our policy COM:L. It is not accepted if it is only a "permission for Wikipedia".

So, if the rights-holder is willing to release the work under a free license, you can upload the file to Commons and then immediately prepare a permission-text, using the boxed text-portion on Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file, in which you should enter the filename (or full URL) of the uploaded file and the name of the choosen license. Then send the completed permission-text to the rightsholder and ask them to read, sign and date it, and to send it back directly (no forwarding) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). Their sent-in permission/email will not be published, but treated confidentially by our OTRS-volunteers. --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delaation request

Hello, please summarize this deletion request, I have a request to delete it for privacy reasons Mahmood baghdadi (talk) 14:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DrinkBox Studios logo alt.png

Hi, why was File:DrinkBox Studios logo alt.png deleted as a non-free logo? The image was licensed directly from the creator and linked to an OTRS ticket to prove it. czar 10:55, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Czar, oops, I hadn't seen the OTRS-template. Restored and moved the template upwards. Sorry. --Túrelio (talk) 12:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wasserzeichen

@Túrelio: Guten Tag Túrelio,
Könntest Du bitte die Dateien in dieser temporär angelegten Kategorie:
Category:Orchidaceae in Belgium Dafejo
überprüfen, ob die Wasserzeichen dieser Bildern entfernt werden können.
Ich kenne die Regeln leider nicht.
Dank und beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 16:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.Category:Le parcours de monsieur EVRARD Daniel.

Hi Orchi,

ist deine Frage technisch oder rechtlich gemeint? Am besten wäre es natürlich, wenn man den Hochlader davon überzeugen könnte, die Fotos ohne WZ, dafür aber mit vernünftigen Metadaten hochzuladen. Letztere haben sie nämlich nicht, sondern nur einen Facebook-Code, der früher oder später zu einem Copyvio-Verdacht führen wird. Eine andere Alternative wäre es, "unsichtbare" WZ (z.B. mit SignMyImage[32]) zu benutzen, weil diese die Nutzbarkeit der Fotos nicht einschränken. Rechtlich ist die Entfernung von Urheberrechts-bezogenen Wasserzeichen (wie in diesem Fall) strittig; auf Commons:Watermarks#Legal issues with the removal of watermarks findest du ein Gutachten der WMF-Rechtsabteilung, das von der Entfernung abrät, und ein deutsches OLG-Urteil, das in der Entfernung eine Verletzung (und damit Ungültigmachung) der CC-Lizenz sieht. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio:

Guten Tag Túrelio,

Vielen Dank für Deine ausführliche Antwort.

Meine Vermutung, diesem Thema nicht gewachsen zu sein, hat sich mit Deinen Hinweisen und Erläuterungen bestätigt.

User:Evrard Daniel hat offensichlich alle seine Bilder mit einem Wasserzeichen markiert.

Für mich ist das Thema (vor allen Dingen: rechtlich) zu schwierig und ich werde in Zukunft keine weiteren Aktivitäten bei diesem Thema unternehmen.

Vielen Dank und beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 15:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your deletion of Category:Maps of Palestine on stamps

Hello,

You deleted Category:Maps of Palestine on stamps on 22 April 2024 as empty. I'd just like to point out that this was the result of disruptive edits such as this and this, although they could have been done in good faith.

I guess we must frequently see overly enthousiastic editors switching the words "Israel" and "Palestine" one for the other, in both directions. I just had to look into mirror Category:Maps of Israel on stamps to find content that shouldn't have been there. So do you think a quick check of this kind would be appropriate before deleting a category with either "Israel" or "Palestine" that comes up as empty? Place Clichy 11:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clichy,

sorry for my late reply, I'm currently in holidays and have limited online-access. I'll try to delay performing deletion of speedy-tagged categories. --Túrelio (talk) 15:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muss man auch mal sagen

Ein Dankeschön für dein Engagement. Gruß -- Bwag (talk) 10:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, so, fast

Hi, I have just provide the correct license for this file there is no options in the upload procedure to set the right license, so, I need to edit after the upload. Please make a review and let me know. Regards. --Marcric (talk) 20:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ok. I`ve changed it to "wrong license", which does not result in speedy-deletion. IMO, CC-0 is not appropriate here. Please take a look at older uploads of the same series and use the accepted PD-tag. It might be PD-US oder PD-old. --Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Túrelio, I have based my decision in the logical (IMHO) license option made by someone else in a similar situation here in 2008. The product being announced, the Red Ryder BB Gun, was produced between 1940 and 1942, so it is fair to suppose the ad is from the same period. And in the upload procedure there is no option for other licenses then the creative commons ones anymore, so, the changes must be done after the upload. I was just trying to edit and update the permission parameter when received you notification. Let me know any decision, because this file is important in both contexts the w:Red Ryder and w:Daisy Outdoor Products articles. Regards. 🤜🤛 --Marcric (talk) 09:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request to remove deletion dicussion

Hi again, Túrelio, Sorry, I had been a bit grouchy last time I'd talk to you because all those English Wiki folks who had blocked me, and sure, I did nothing, even if you think I did it. Now a whole bunch of blocked computers can't be used in the computer lab at my school for Wiki, not my fault. Anyway, I had just provided for the following files and this to be be reviewed. Please let me know soon. Thanks, MinecraftPlayer321 (talk) 01:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chances, if you could recovered the deleted files* I had made, that would be awesome for me to change the wrong license. If not, that's okay. *P.S I don't have the photos files on my PC, so yeah. MinecraftPlayer321 (talk) 01:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MinecraftPlayer321,

I'm currently in holidays and have limited online-access. The Zuru-log might be ok. Wrt the Lego Bricks Truck it's unfortunate that nobody has commented at the DR. A DR should not be closed by the same user (me), who had opened it. --Túrelio (talk) 16:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My picture is not taken from that page tho

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=356385554 the image I uploaded is from a document I procured from my btl profile. It's the same info, but it's not taken from there. It's a screenshot from a document available only to me. Benderbr (talk) 05:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Hello I have uploaded a new photo of this file with higher quality, if possible, please delete this file https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wheat_production_by_country_2022.jpg

substitute of file https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wheat-production.png

And if possible, delete this file as well https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Corn_production_by_country_2022.jpg

substitute of file https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Corn_production.png Matinmatinmm (talk) 08:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted file

Why'd you delete File:Special Education school in the Republic of Crimea, Russian Federation.jpeg under G3? I only blurred out the faces as a privacy protection. Ogundareibrahim123 (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ogundareibrahim123,

the image had been G3-tagged by User:ДолбоЯщер, which might have been not the optimal choise. However, I would have deleted it as being out of COM:SCOPE, as surely nobody would have used it. In addition, putting a "handycapped"-icon onto the faces of these people might be well seen a personality-rights violation, even if that was not your intention. --Túrelio (talk) 06:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Of CC0 1.0 Image

Hello, I am writing to ask why this image was deleted: c:File:Michael Lucas Puerto Vallarta 2023 (Photo By Mano Martinez).jpg

The file has a CC0 1.0 license applied to it.

Michael Lucas (Puerto Vallarta, 2024) by Mano Martinez is marked with CC0 1.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

https://www.lucasentertainment.com/meet-the-lucasmen/michael-lucas-during-a-puerto-vallarta-2023-production-by-mano-martinez/

~~~~ BlackNYer (talk) 13:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BlackNYer,

my bad. Seems I overlooked the license on the source-site. Now restored. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated image

Guten Abend Túrelio. I would like to ask you a question. Yesterday I mistakenly uploaded an image that I had already uploaded a year ago (here the original and here the repeated version). What is the procedure to delete the second image? Dank im Voraus. CFA1877 (talk) 11:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @CFA1877, you want to have File:Huelva - 49960418776.jpg, right? --Túrelio (talk) 19:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that's right. CFA1877 (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank ;) CFA1877 (talk) 15:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MIstaken deletion of File:Codigo-aflaf-placa-sinalizacao-estado-sao-paulo-lei-13541-proibido-fumar-lei-antifumo.svg

I'm pretty sure this and that was a mistake - the file is indeed a dupe of File:Test.svg, but only for now. Undo it, please - Gabuxae (talk) 08:48, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes. This resulted from an erroneous dupe-tagging by the dupe-bot. --Túrelio (talk) 19:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.. Reverted one more instance - Gabuxae (talk) 07:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken categorical deletion

The files that were originally posted to Category:Washington Commanders at New York Jets, 20 August 2024 (Preseason) were deleted after a move to Category:Washington Commanders at New York Jets, 10 August 2024 (Preseason). Dissident93 (talk) 15:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give an example for the allegedly wrongly deleted files? --Túrelio (talk) 15:31, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Preseason Week 1- Commanders at Jets - 53916585297.jpg Dissident93 (talk) 15:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you had tagged it for speedy-deletion by yourself, which I have performed under the G7-rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 15:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I assumed that would delete the old category and not the files tagged within it. Dissident93 (talk) 16:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, 41 files restored. Next time, be a bit more careful please. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lee Young-kyoung.png

Hi,

Is this a re-uploaded image of File:Lee_Young-kyoung.jpg ? 0x0a (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

license

Hello Túrelio,
[33] the license is at the bottome of description of source page..
--Gpkp (talk) 08:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are correct. Seems I overlooked it as it's placed at the deepest end of that page. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Túrelio. I got worried as there were 50+ uploads from the same source with a possibility of getting nominated. --Gpkp (talk) 08:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+++Regards

Dear Turelio,

Thank you for your attention to detail on Wikipedia. However, I would like to clarify a couple of points regarding the removal of my profile picture.

The image I used is a promotional touristic photograph of the Kingdom of Spain and, as such, is under a license that allows its free use without copyright restrictions. Therefore, it does not infringe any laws or regulations.

It is common to find images used in various contexts, including personal profiles on platforms like Wikipedia. In fact, your profile picture can also be found on other websites.

I invite you to review the following page for more information on the license of the image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EselEttalerMuehle_1092.jpg

I hope this explanation clarifies the situation.

Thank you very much for your time and understanding. AM AtlasMarck (talk) 22:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AtlasMarck,

assuming you are relating to File:F1jWKFSX-oAE-9HB.jpg: you uploaded it on August 7th, while it was uploaded to gay.it already in June (https://www.gay.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/gran-canaria-10-borghi-da-visitare-1200x675.jpg). Nevertheless, you claimed it as "own work". In addition, your conclusion "promotional touristic photograph" thereby "allows ... free use without copyright restrictions" is without base in fact. If taken as fact, it needs evidence. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Erste Bank Open

Hi, ich hatte nicht vor, das File, dass der verifizierte Benutzer Emotion Group unter seinem Benutzernamen hochgeladen hat, jetzt gelöscht zu bekommen, weil er sich in den Exif-Metadaten e|motion schreibt und ich das (ohne Auftrag) leichtsinnig in die Autor-Information übernommen habe. Ich habe eigentlich keinen Zweifel, dass das dasselbe ist. Ailura (talk) 13:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @User:Ailura,

Danke für das zwischenzeitliche Verlinken der betroffenen Dateien. Da ich relativ viel lösche, ist es ziemlich mühsam, das über die Log-Liste herauszufinden, zumal wenn die Löschung schon einige Stunden zurückliegt. Es geht also um:

Wenn du den Eindruck hast, dass die Uploads in "guter Absicht" erfolgt sind, weil du den Uploader schon "kennst" oder betreust, dann bitte ihn doch einfach, für beide Dateien eine formelle Genehmigung, idealerweise vom tatsächlichen Fotografen an OTRS zu schicken. Wenn er das zusagt, kann ich die beiden Dateien entlöschen und mit OTRS-pending markieren. Grundsätzlich ist es so, dass auch bei verifizierten Benutzern nicht einfach davon ausgegangen wird, dass die Rechte für alle Uploads schon vorliegen (hatte ich früher auch mal angenommen, wurde aber eines besseren belehrt). --Túrelio (talk) 16:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gelöschte Files zu finden, wenn man keine erweiterten Rechte hat, ist auch nicht so einfach. Ich frag mal an. Nur nochmal zum Verständnis: Wenn der Benutzer verifiziert ist, muss er für Werke, die er als eigene angibt und bei denen er u.a. in den Exif-Metadaten steht trotzdem eine formelle Genehmigung schicken? Ailura (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, genau; mit Ausnahme der Anmerkung zu den Exif-Daten, das hatte ich selbst noch nicht. Das kommt von den OTRS- bzw. VRT-Kollegen (zähle ich nicht dazu), die sich um Genehmigungen kümmern; ggf. kannst du vorab, z.B. Kollegen User:Krd, wegen der Exif-Besonderheit nachfragen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Hi, All three accounts are belong to (Sockpuppetry) one person. This person are uploading promotional files in Wikipedia. Yesterday all uploads were deleted by you. But today user uploaded again the same files with different names. Please block all three accounts in commons and delete all new promotional uploads

deleted file are (my 21 August edtions)

Thanks.[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 17:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:IceCool.png

Hi
You ~~deleted~~ this image with stated reason being: "twitter doesn't appear to license freely".
The twemojis are released under a CC-BY license. (If you had looked at my latest edit on that page, you would have found out about it and maybe you wouldn't have deleted it.)
regards
Emdosis (talk) 22:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Emdosis: Sorry, I had not seen that page. Barring a reply here from Túrelio, please post this on COM:UDEL. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:53, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. Sorry, I had overlooked the license at github. --Túrelio (talk) 06:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good 👍. Emdosis (talk) 08:45, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potential copyvio farm

Hi Túrelio, I noticed you deleted File:Rescuer onlooker at the landslide location on 01 August 2024.jpg after finding out it was a copyvio. I was looking into this user due to some disruption on en.wiki, and in addition to the copyright notices on their talkpage File:Participants in first summit.png seems to be taken directly from this site. The two current socks that have uploaded images are here and here. I actually tineyed them before I knew they were socks, and didn't find anything, but since becoming aware of the larger pattern the uploads seem potentially concerning. Best, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 16:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unberechtigte Löschung

Hallo,

du hast heute ein hochgeladenes Foto "BONEZ MC Primary.jpg" mit folgendem Grund gelöscht "Copyright violation: https://www.reddit.com/user/Bonez-MC/comments/bp3t65/luv_him/" ... der Upload des Fotos erfolgte mit Zustimmung und Wissen des Urheberrechtsinhabers / des Künstlers selbst. Warum löscht man dieses Foto und gibt als Quelle ein Bild bei Reddit an welches eine Urheberrechtsverletzung ist? Wir fordern die Widerherstellung und zukünftige Unterlassung von derartigen Mutwilligen Handlungen. Gib doch beim nächsten Mal eine Quelle an die auch den Account des Urhberrechtsinhabers zeigt und nicht die eines X-beliebigen Fake Accounts. Jaidenkioken (talk) 13:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

du hattest das Foto File:BONEZ MC Primary.jpg 1. heute hochgeladen, 2. als urheberrechtlich dein eigenes Werk deklariert und 3. angegeben es sei vom 26. August 2024.

Von einem anderen Benutzer wurde es aber auf Reddit[34] gefunden, wo es bereits vor 5 Jahren hochgeladen wurde. Damit ist zumindest deine Datierung als falsch erwiesen. Derjenige, der ein Werk als erster publiziert, gilt prima facie als Urheber. Gemäß den Commons-Spielregeln steht dein Upload daher unter URV-Verdacht und wurde gelöscht (COM:PRP).

Dein Wording "wir fordern ..." und "Zustimmung und Wissen des Urheberrechtsinhabers / des Künstlers selbst" legt zudem nahe, dass du nicht selbst der Urheber (Fotograf) bist, sondern vermutlich im Auftrag des Abgebildetenen (Agentur) tätig bist. In solchen Fällen ist es erforderlich, dass der Urheberrechtsinhaber gegenüber dem Commons:Volunteer Response Team (permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org) eine formale Erklärung zur Urheberschaft /zum Nutzungsrecht abgibt und die gewählte freie Lizenz bestätigt. Diese Erklärung muss vom Urheber oder Urheberrechtsinhaber direkt an die o.g. Adresse gesandt werden (also keine Weiterleitung). Eine (deutschsprachige) Textvorlage für diese Erklärung findest du hier: Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber). --Túrelio (talk) 14:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Es ist schon alarmierend zu sehen welche Unwissenheit hier zu Tage gefördert wird. "Derjenige, der ein Werk als erster publiziert, gilt prima facie als Urheber." Diese Aussage ist komplett falsch und basiert offensichtlich auf gefährlichen Halbwissen. Der Urheber ist derjenige der das Werk erstellt hat. Es ist dabei irrelevant ob das Werk veröffentlicht wurde oder nicht. Jaidenkioken (talk) 16:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spar dir deine Belehrungen. Ich habe dir geschildert was nach unseren Regeln erforderlich ist, damit das Bild wiederhergestellt werden kann, werde mit dir aber nicht weiter kommunizieren, zumal ich im Genehmigungsprozess auf Commons nicht involviert bin.--Túrelio (talk) 18:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CropTool

Since a few days Croptool is not working for me. When I go to the image I want to crop, it just leads me to the "Enter the URL or filename for an image you would like to crop." page and when I type the file name again, it just gets stuck in "File:«name of the file.jpg» found on «commons.wikimedia.org». Nothing like this happened before to me. I have tried everything, clearing the browser data and restarting but without any success. Could you please assist me in this matter or let me know what can be done. Regards JayFT047 (talk) 15:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually just noticed, now it is only happening with this pic where I want to extract a cropped image: File:Pakistan national football team group picture.jpg JayFT047 (talk) 15:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JayFT047,

sorry, but I never used this CropTool and therefore don't have any experience with it. I use the crop function of the freeware IrfanView[35]. --Túrelio (talk) 18:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weirdly it just started working now... Thanks for the recommendation anyways. Just one thing, I just uploaded this screenshot from a video from Youtube under free license. However, I have changed the aspect ratio as it is quite unfavourable because it's recorded by phone and I'm unsure if that will affect the YoutubeReview check. Could you please review it. Cheers and thank you very much JayFT047 (talk) 22:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Babalanda Joan Peace.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Can you check to see whether File:Dr. Babalanda Joan Peace.jpg is the same as en:File:Joan Peace Babalanda.JPG? The same person uploaded both files and they might've simply reuploaded the same file locally to English Wikipedia after you deleted it from Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly Please see w:en:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 August 27 where I have followed the to enWiki and suggested deletion 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images in Category:Rodrigo Beltran

Thanks for deleting File:Chica con sombrero.jpg; however, I think you missed my comment "see also other images in Category:Rodrigo Beltran". Please could you check and delete the copyvios? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now all images tagged with no-perm or copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 18:38, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moving and deletion of Category:Categories of Belarus by district

Hello! You've deleted Category:Categories of Belarus by district which content was previously moved to Category:Districts of Belarus by topic without any discussion. I don't see any categories named «Districts of <Country> by topic», but plenty named «Categories of <Country> by district» (Azerbaijan, Germany, Poland etc.) Also I think category was not well moved as new category was created instead of moving previous category, so prevoius categorisation and history was lost. Should these actions be reconsidered? Red Winged Duck (talk) 10:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

the deletion was performed on request by User:Adamant1. So, while I have no problem to undelete it etc., I would recommend you to discuss the issue with said user in order that you both eventually come to an agreement. --Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "File:JoshuaHabkaBio-Hacking.jpg"

Hello! Shouldn't this image be approprite to remain on the commons since on the web-site it says that the images have the Attribution 4.0 license as long as they do not have one of those QR codes?

Thanks! StructuredWookie (talk) 16:57, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 18:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "File:Motorola moto e (2020) Front.jpg"

Hello, this image was deleted due to an image displayed on the phone screen, but even as the central focus, you can just redact the "Friday night Funkin'" asset from the phone's display. the primary purpose of the image is to show off the specific phone model. 2603:8001:8400:DC34:8D91:1C06:45FB:BE32 05:59, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. But, is there really no better image of that model? I mean, if we remove the displayed icon, the remaining image shows near-to nothing. So, we can redact the icon, but is the resulting image worth the effort? --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I recall it only took the portions of the screen near the sides and the rest of the image remains intact 204.100.235.147 16:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found this photo on Flickr. At least the image in the middle would pose no problem. The left one would need further evaluation due to the screen. But not sure whether it's the right model. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1943 establishments in Ternopil Oblast

Restore Category:1943 establishments in Ternopil Oblast. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also Category:1965 in Ternopil Oblast --Микола Василечко (talk) 20:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also Category:1965 establishments in Ternopil Oblast --Микола Василечко (talk) 20:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also Category:1943 establishments in Ukraine by region, Category:1943 in Ternopil Oblast, Category:1965 establishments in Ukraine by region. --Микола Василечко (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gefälschte Bilder

Guten Abend Túrelio. Mal sehen, auf es:wiki wurde ein Scherz entdeckt. Hier in Commons gibt es Bilder über das vermeintliche Thema, aber man gibt keine Quellen an und ich vermute, dass es sich um gefälschte Bilder handelt. Dann... was können wir in diesem Fall tun? CFA1877 (talk) 17:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CFA1877,

Danke für den Hinweis. Auf die Schnelle habe ich die 3 Bilder jetzt erst einmal mit {{Fact}} markiert und auf der jeweiligen Disku ein Link nach :es hinterlassen. Morgen werde ich für alle 3 einen LA stellen, in dem dann ggf. die Indizienlage diskutiert werden kann. --Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prima. Danke dir. CFA1877 (talk) 20:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Намдаков Даши Бальжанович.jpg

Hello! Is this my download? I just don't remember it. If it's really mine, can I have the text part? Insider (talk) 20:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes, it was, though you had cropped it only.

|description=

Русский: Намдаков Даши Бальжанович

|date=2003-10-08 17:30:36 |source=File:Выставка Даши Намдакова.jpg |author=Роман Емельяненко (original), Insider (crop)

The original image had been deleted already 5 years ago. --Túrelio (talk) 21:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I get it, apparently someone asked me to do it. Thank you. Insider (talk) 21:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anti-discrimination Students Movement procession on 2 August.webp

How can a file under Creative Commons license be deleted for copyright infringement? On what grounds was it deleted? Was its license checked? - Ash wki (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anti-discrimination Students Movement procession on 2 August.webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://businesspostbd.com/files/thumbs/daily-media/Dated/2024/July/14/964x551/Print-04.webp

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ash wki (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the evidence that this photo has been put under a free license? The provided source doesn't say so. The author, who is the only who can release it under a CC-BY license, is unknown, as you claim. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting to duplicate file

It's absolutely unnecessary: File:Kenkichi Tomimoto and his family, end of 1917.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.50.3.130 (talk) 07:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects are created automatically by the duplicate-script. --Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. 82.61.202.80 10:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do the same redirects with these: File talk:Kenkichi Tomimoto and Shinichi Sasagawa, circa 1917-1918.jpg, File talk:Kenkichi Tomimoto (right) with unknown, circa 1917.jpg, File talk:Kenkichi Tomimoto and his daughter.jpg? Thank you. 82.61.202.80 10:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, read very well my instructions: it's the opposite files to be redirected. Don't do the same error and invert immediately it for "Kenkichi Tomimoto & Shinichi Sasagawa" and "Kenkichi Tomimoto (1917)". 82.61.202.80 10:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Each one of the duplicate-files were protected (likely due to previous edit-warring). Therefore I had to redirect to the protected versions, not the other way round. --Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Yamamoto Heikichi" is very good, with the full page and the Japanese explanation. Can you redirect "Yamamoto Heikichi (1913)" to it? Thank you. 79.16.11.68 11:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do it? 193.207.153.240 07:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged the file. --Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delete "Yamamoto Heikichi (1913)"? It's only an exactly-scaled down of "Yamamoto Heikichi". Thank you. 193.207.108.147 12:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do it? 79.18.119.157 10:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the File:Grapefruit Juice and Medicine May Not Mix (6774935740) - en.svg

Hello, I would like to include the Spanish version of this image, but for any reason I made a bad job. I am rather new in wikipedia and learning... Can you tell me why you delete it, please? Thanks Beatriz.V1.0 (talk) 01:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ahhh...I can see, there is an Spanish version by Victor Atallah in X. Sorry I am not in X and I have no user in this social network. How to proceed? Beatriz.V1.0 (talk) 01:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, by "Spanish version" you mean a version where all the text is in spanish, right? You can access content on Twitter/X without having an own account. I doubt that the text in this diagram is above threshold of originality. So, you could simply copy it. On the other hand, as the original comes from the FDA and as Spanish is a relevant language in the U.S., the FDA might themselves have a Spanish version. --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, complete text in Spanish and yes, I can access the X, but I assume that X is not a confident source of information. I will try to get the files at FDA or contact them. Thanks --Túrelio. Beatriz.V1.0 (talk) 11:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Moldova (Project Lobachev).svg

Hello! This file was initially deleted per deletion request on May 27, 2021 but was rapidly recreated without a permit on May 30, 2021 and used for cross-wiki misinformation by the now indefinitely blocked user. 81.23.165.9 09:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry, I hadn't seen the past history. However, the file has now been protected by a colleague. So, before taking any action, first we need to come to an agreement/consensus. --Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for answering! That protection is clearly wrong and unreasonable… But how can we come to an agreement if that colleague ignores requests? 81.23.164.45 09:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright delle foto

Chiedo scusa, invece che continuare a cancellarmi le foto e le modifiche che faccio, mi puoi dire dove diavolo sbaglio??? Almeno risolvo il problema una volta per tutte!!! La foto è mia, l'ho scattata io, non ci sono diritti sopra, è di libero utilizzo!! Se per cortesia mi dite COSA devo scrivere e DOVE mi fareste un favore. Continuare a cancellarmi tutto ogni settimana fa perdere tempo a me e a voi! RolanddiGilead1971 (talk) 10:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the most important question is whether YOU are really the photographer. I doubt that, as none of your uploads has metadata from the camera. In File:Emilie Haavi in azione con la maglia della Roma - stagione 23-24 2.jpeg you wrote "Foto scattata da un amico durante una partita di campionato e concessami in uso gratuito e libero per Wikipedia". As the other images are of a similar appearance, I assume at best that they come from the same "friend". If that is true, then 1) you cannot write "own work", and 2) your friend needs to personally confirm to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS) that he/she agrees that his/her photos are released on Commons under a free license, that also allows commercial re-use. AFAIK, the same has been told to you already on your talkpage on :it.--Túrelio (talk) 11:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a duplicate

Please undo your deletion of File:Shanshan 2024 path.png. This is not a duplicate of File:Shanshan 2024 track.png because the former uses the new track colors and the latter the old track colors, as per en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather/Colour discussions. User:Supportstorm is defying the consensus by continuing to upload old-colored tracks, which are not to be used at all on Wikipedia. Jasper Deng (talk|meta) 22:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deleted page

Hi!

I'm trying to develop a page for a mexican actor, why was it deleted? I was about to add IMDB and sources.

best regards Frv24 (talk) 20:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your userpage User:Frv24 is not the right place to write/develop a page/article about another person. Use your talkpage for that or create a subpage, such as User talk:Frv24/Fernando Veloz for example. Anyway, Commons is not the place for articles, but just for files/media.--Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Typhoon-Yagi 5.jpg

Can you access the file? I purged the page for a few times, but at the end I only get File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public.d5/d/d5/Typhoon-Yagi_5.jpg when I clicked into the image. What problem do you think it is?廣九直通車 (talk) 09:11, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It is shown without any problem; I now checked all resolutions. If you have a second browser on your computer, eventually try it with that one. If it works well, it might be a cache-problem of the first browser. Just try to clear its cache. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's strange. I tried my computer's Microsoft Edge and my phone's Google Chrome. None succeeded. Also the smaller resolutions returned 404 error. Maybe I'll send the matter to COM:VPT. Anyways thanks for clarifying the file is not broken.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Totentanz

Hi Túrelio, ich habe den beschädigten Totentanz fotografiert und eine Unterkategorie angelegt, der ich die „destroyed“-Kategorie gegeben habe. Das Original wird ja wohl wieder restauriert werden … liebe Grüße aus Köln Elya (talk) 10:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elya, perfekt. --Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]